Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNNMoney: The Five Highest Paid, Worst Performing CEOs of 2008 - (Median worker wage is $42,270)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:55 AM
Original message
CNNMoney: The Five Highest Paid, Worst Performing CEOs of 2008 - (Median worker wage is $42,270)
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 11:18 AM by Bozita
from CNNMoney:

5 most overpaid CEOs
Despite last year's financial tumult, these five CEOs are still sitting pretty. Here is the Corporate Library's list of the "Highest Paid Worst Performers" of 2008.

Michael Jeffries, Abercrombie & Fitch


The Corporate Library, a corporate governance research firm, reviewed regulatory filings from 2,000 publicly traded companies and came up with a list of five chief executives they're calling the "Highest Paid Worst Performers" of 2008.

To make the list, a CEO had to have total realized income -- including base salary, bonuses and stock -- of at least $30 million last year. At the same time, the share price of the companies they oversaw had to have underperformed rivals and the broad sampling of stocks in the S&P 500 over the last five years.

Abercrombie's Michael Jeffries was awarded total compensation of $71.8 million last year, with a base salary of $1.5 million, according to the Corporate Library.

His compensation package included a $6 million "stay bonus" designed to keep him on board, despite his 17-year tenure, as well as perks such as the use of a corporate jet.

The Corporate Library notes that Jeffries is compensated at "the upper quartile" of his peer group. In other words, the compensation committee that determines his pay assures he'll be paid more than what 75% of his rival CEOs get.

"If you do that, you're almost guaranteed to overpay your CEO," said Paul Hodgson, a senior researcher at the Corporate Library.

An Abercrombie spokeswoman declined to comment.



That's just the first one. See the other four at:
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/news/0909/gallery.highest_paid_worst_CEOs/index.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Damn... $60.3 million over base salary.
Don't know if I even want to see the rest, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Much as I dislike corporate columnist Robert Samuelson
He did hit one out of the park several years ago when discussing CEO compensation. He had a list of questions every board of directors should ask of its CEO, and demand direct answers. I don’t remember all the questions, but a few of them were: “What are we paying you?” That was to include base compensation, performance bonuses, retention bonuses and bonus bonuses. Every dime out of the corporate coffers that made its way into the CEO’s pocket. The next question piggy-backed on the first: “Where else could you get that kind of pay?” They wanted a list of other players in their industry who would similarly compensate their CEO.

Then it went into “What do you do?” What are the CEO’s responsibilities, does he handle all these duties personally or does he have a staff that does the actual work? Following on that was “Who is your successor?” Is the CEO grooming someone to step in when he leaves? Or what would happen if the corporate jet went down in a storm, or if the CEO keeled over from a heart attack (fatal or disabling)? Would there be someone who could assume the reins? If not, why not?

It was a pretty good list of questions. I don’t recall it causing any kind of industry reform, but it was a pretty good column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would like to know what our corporate boards of directors do, besides rubberstamping a CEOs plans
Love your summary of Samuelson, though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. link to Bureau of Labor Statistics figure of $42,270 as median worker wage in May, 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. "...this formula has resulted in $625 million in 'aggregate bonuses' for Isenberg. "
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 12:14 PM by quiet.american
Isenberg's total compensation was driven mostly by a $58.7 million bonus, which was calculated based on a percentage of the company's cash flow. Over the years, this formula has resulted in $625 million in "aggregate bonuses" for Isenberg.

A Nabors spokesman said Isenberg recently renegotiated his contract and that his bonus formula is now based less on company cash flow.

Over half a billion dollars in compensation. Who says you can't get rich working for somebody else. (If you're in the "club," that is.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. I should have known the Comcast CEO would be on this list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC