Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does it matter that a PO isn't coming out of the Senate Finance Committee?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:18 PM
Original message
Does it matter that a PO isn't coming out of the Senate Finance Committee?
If Dems are going to use Reconciliation to pass the bill anyway, they don't need the Senate Finance Committee to tell them what the bill is going to be, do they?

They can craft the bill however they want it and push it on through.

Or is there some mechanism that says the bill must go through the Finance committee. Really, I'm just so disgusted and want to know that there is a way to get a PO without the Senate Finance committee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. No

All that matters is that the House will not compromise in the reconciliation committee - no public option - no bill.


Given the problem that mandates are going to create they are idiots if they try and go ahead without a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. This definitely isn't the end.
There's still Kennedy's bill and whatever comes out of the House. Don't give up hope yet. In the mean time - call Baucus, Conrad and Lincoln - tell them you're going to work to defeat their re-elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Feck Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Roger that!
Fuckin' asswipes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does it matter? Yes. Is this the end? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not really
But it will be used as a talking point that the public option didn't clear one Senate committee. Approximately 95% of Americans won't give a happy rat's ass about that, but unfortunately there will be a relentless 5% who will use this as the linchpin of their argument that health care reform is illegitimate.

If there was ever a time when policy victors and vanquished would put aside their differences and work for the common good once legislation was passed, that time is gone. Probably forever. Health care reform will be a wingnut talking point against government for decades to come, in the same way they speak against intrusive government regulation that prevents people from exercising their God-given right to starve in the street, or get poisoned by a trip to the grocer's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Finance has a lot of leverage, iirc. But, yeah, the Baucus bill isn't the *only* game in town.
And Schumer's amendment, shot down just now, isn't the only one in line.

It was a good one, but not the only one to help craft a result with a public option. I think Schumer knew it would fail. He's keeping the pressure on. What a convoluted process.

:kick:

And in reconciliation, if they get to that point, 51 votes carry the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Wasn't it the Rockefeller Bill that was Shot Down?
Or was Schumer's bill also killed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. It was Rockefeller's and Schumer's AMENDMENTS to the
Baucas bill that were shot down today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Thanks. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. This isn't over by along shot. The disfunctionality has to be dealt with some way or another.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Senate Finance Committee's version is the only one of the 5 that doesn't have some type of
public option (2 bills in Senate & 3 bills in House).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. No... it doesn't really matter.. but that won't stop the wailing and gnashing of teeth
..from the uninformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. If all the "wailers and gnashers" get on the horn to their Senators. .
it is not wasted heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobburgster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. It would have been better...
if it came out of the Senate Finance committee, but it is not the end all of the public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well it does matter, but it's not surprising.
I mean c'mon... the Finance Committee? We've seen the bill they came up with. I'd have been shocked beyond belief if it had come from that lot.

However it does matter, and it is meaningful. It should give the constituents in those Senators states a lot to think about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hopefully they will use reconciliation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. It Will Matter Come The Primaries
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 03:36 PM by Beetwasher
When we wax the assess of the douchebag Dems who voted against the PO.

As far as the final legislation? Probably doesn't matter all that much. The House is NOT budging regarding the inclusion of a PO. There WILL be a public option in the bill BO signs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. It makes it easier to defeat when it comes to floor. of Senate.
Essentially the Committee sets the tone. The narrative at the
moment is PO failed in Committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Disagree. One committee, one amendment. It's not over yet.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. It matters because it shows us who is and isn't on our side.
I think those lines have been pretty well drawn today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC