Colorado agreed. McCloud, California said Oh Hell No. Sacramento City leaders are sliming a stealth deal in without involving the public. The American River flows are CRUCIAL to the health of the San Francisco Bay Delta, where the Gubernator and SoCal interests want to put a Peripheral Canal voted down by the public decades ago. The clean American River water is highly sought after by Bay Area municipalities, who wanted to divert it BEFORE the American water merged with the dirty Sacramento River water and flowed to the Delta naturally. They were deterred. Now this. The Water Wars are ON.
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/14622/Fluid_controversy_Nestle_wants_Sacramentos_waterhttp://www.saveourwatersacramento.org/http://www.saveourwatersacramento.org/?cat=5What Nestle doesn’t want you to know
about its plans to open a water bottling plant in Sacramento
• Nestlé and the City of Sacramento worked hard to quietly fast-track this project so Nestlé could open its South Sacramento bottling plant by January 2010. The project was only announced in a brief back page article in the Sacramento Bee at the end of July.
• While Sacramento residents are required to abide by city-imposed water restrictions, Nestlé would be able to siphon water from our municipal water supply 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. According to one staff member at the Economic Development Department, the only limit on the amount of water Nestlé can pump is the size of their pipes.
• Nestlé claims the Sacramento plant would be a “micro-bottling plant,” bottling only 50 million gallons of water per year. However, according to the Department of Utilities, the estimated water usage is 215 thousand – 320 thousand gallons of water per day (78 – 116 millions per year). This would make Nestlé one of the top ten water users in Sacramento at a time when we are in our third consecutive year of a drought.
• According to Nestlé, approximately 30 million gallons of water would come from Sacramento’s municipal water system and 20 million would be trucked to the plant from “private springs.” City staff have refused to answer questions about the springs and Nestlé has provided no information about their location, other than telling the Sacramento News & Review that they are somewhere in the Sierra Nevada foothills.
• Bottling 50 million gallons of water a year would create 800 million water bottles annually. It takes over 400,000 barrels of oil to produce that much plastic. Only 14% of plastic bottles get recycled – the rest end up not only in our landfills, but also in our forests, streams, and oceans.
• The diesel fuel required to truck 20 million gallons of water from the “nearby springs” to Sacramento and 800 million bottles across the state is enormous. Diesel truck emissions contain carbon dioxide and diesel soot, which both contribute to global warming. Diesel exhaust also contributes to air contamination, which is known to cause cancer and other health problems.
• Nestlé would take our tap water and sell it back to us after marking it up over 1,000 times what they paid for it. If Nestlé is allowed to build a water bottling plant in Sacramento, they can take as much water as they want, for as long as they want, without any limits or accountability.
• Water is becoming scarcer as the population grows and the drought continues. The water in Sacramento should be for the plants, animals and humans in this region to live on, not for big companies to amass enormous wealth. If Nestlé is allowed to build this plant, we give up even more control of our water for as long as that plant exists. The City says that Nestlé has a right to move here. Shouldn’t Sacramentans have a right to a secure water supply?
CA. AG Cracks Down On Nestle Bottling Plant
http://cbs13.com/local/nestle.bottling.plant.2.782999.html:spray: :toast: :spray: :toast: :spray: :toast: :spray: :toast: :spray: :toast: :spray: :toast:
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
