Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

this is why the fucker Polanski ran. 48 days. the reneging on deal, 48 fuckin days.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 06:43 AM
Original message
this is why the fucker Polanski ran. 48 days. the reneging on deal, 48 fuckin days.
Edited on Wed Sep-30-09 06:54 AM by seabeyond
But the original judge in the case, who is now dead, first sent the director to maximum-security prison for 42 days while he underwent psychological testing. Then, on the eve of his sentencing, the judge told attorneys he was inclined to send Polanski back to prison for another 48 days.



http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/09/29/polanski.filmmakers.protest/index.html





HOW dare the judge want to have Polanski finish out the mere and measly 90 days that he had sent the man in for psych eval.

what an arrogant man Polanski is,... 48 days. Polanski throwing a fit about judge reneging on deal and judge was really gonna go after Polanski, bad judge, really breaking a deal. 48 fuckin days

the man would have spent a FULL FUCKIN 90 days for raping a girl. a whole fuckin 90 days. and the man ran

what a little piece of chicken shit nothing Polanski is

48 days is what people have been yelling about with the judge reneging. 48 days is the MISCONDUCT of the judge. Polanski rapes the girl and judge is the bad guy cause he wants Polanski to do 48 more days.

after reading the article and the producers DEMANDING u.s. release Polanski, i got to that 48 days in the article and just who do these people think they are. throw his ass in jail....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Throw his sorry ass in jail so far they have to pipe sunshine in
and shoot beans with a cannon for him to eat. fuck roman polanski, may he die incarcerated. It wouldn't bother me if his death was at the hands of his cellmate, for the animal has no right to life. IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. lol, a tad harsh. dont know if i would go that far. but geez the arrogance of these people
the article is producers DEMAND..... who the fuck are they

havent had enough coffee yet either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sorry bout that
harshness that is. For the most part I hide the puke polanski threads but for some reason I was drawn to this one and boy did it not bring out the worst in me I must say.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. lol. that is how i was. i never type before coffee. can barely read. but
Edited on Wed Sep-30-09 07:05 AM by seabeyond
i saw producers DEMAND... fuck them. then got to 48 fuckin days and i got so mad

i hear ya

i stopped going into polanski threads yesterday

just the arrogance. just puke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. whatever.
Polanski will be extradited to the U.S. and whatever happens will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. i was just surprised it was all about finishing 90 day sentence. that is all it was. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Maybe what happens
is that he will experience the victim's side of a sex crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I certainly hope not. I'm against all rape.
you sound like you think that would be a dandy thing. That's sick, dear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
43. I didn't say whether I favored it or not
I will let each reader of my comment bring his or her own experiences and feelings to interpret it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Incredible, isn't it?
This goes to show that if you have money and/or fame, you can get away with anything. Jesus, I posted a few days ago that he should have stayed and taken his punishment back then since rapists tend to get a slap on the wrist here in the states. That's most especially true if you have $ and friends in high places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. what is really pissin me off, driving kids to school. producers DEMAND his release
Edited on Wed Sep-30-09 08:24 AM by seabeyond
they DEMAND he be released. a girl raped and they make demands. asshole actresses supporting this creep for rape

where are the women of hollywood standing up for a female raped

this is the most clear evidence of the fuckin male privilige we have seen in a long long time and women go along.

(i dont know if you are male or female and not going after you if you are male. i love ALL the men that are pissed about this too. because all the gender gets it with creeps like this and so much wrong in that. especially as there are so many many men on du calling this out.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. It's shocking.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
41. What pisses me off
are all the people on DU promulgating the meme that the "judge reneged on the plea agreement so it was okay that he ran". I had no idea that the plea agreement that he reneged on would be that he was sentenced to ONLY 90 DAYS!!!! Fuck Polanski and fuck those on DU that are apologists for that scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. that is what got me this morning, before coffee, before i could barely read
and had the toughes time typing. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. All this uproar over 48 friggin days?
Sure glad nobody has anything else to get excited about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. it is not about everyone else. it is about a man that rapes and 48 days is excessive punishment
it is about a hollywood crowd ignore rape and DEMAND this man let go for rape.

it is about condoning raping a girl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Guess I didn't say that very well
Actually I learned more from your post than I ever knew about this.

I'm as pissed as you are that this POS was gonna get with a 90 day sentence.

Far as I'm concerned he should have gotten 90 years. I hope they throw his ass under the jail when they get him back here.

I just don't think the outrage, either for or against him, is worth a brazillion threads here on DU. It's not like we don't have other things to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. i hear you. i so hear you. yesterday was done. not on any more threads. was done with
subject.

it had been a couple days on threads learning what had happened, trying to get info. in past, i hadnt cared about it or thought much of it. just didnt watch his movies. that was my stance. i didnt know the girl had been flat out raped.

but i was done yesterday

and felt good

then read fuckin 48 days and asshole male producers DEMANDING he released adn women actresses saying let him go. no female in hollywood saying asshole raped.

and i got pissed all over again

but i do hear ya on the threads on du thing

just fuckin 48 days. listening to all these people say how judge reneged and gonna throw book at him. we couldnt find info. 48 friggin days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. Had He Been Caught Today...
I know someone who was convicted of having sex with a 16 year old. He ended up doing 3 years in prison for far less than what Polanski was accused of. I'm not up to snuff on California law, but if he had been found guilty of just the one charge in this state, he'd face a minimum of 3 years in a state facility and then monitored constantly upon parole being forced to move if he resides too close to a school or family with children.

Add to this his jumping the conditions of his bail...another crime that would surely tack on time for a convict without the fame. There's no defense of his fleeing...had he felt he was wronged during the trial, that's what appeals are for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. i wonder how many of the folks calling for his head have swiss bank accounts
with ubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I doubt too many people here have swiss bank accounts, sweetie.
but that's totally beside the point in any case. trust you to leap to the inane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. hm.... since the rich are DEMANDING he be released, i woud imagine not many. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. here at DU? hadn;t noticed anyone demanding his release, just villagers screaming
for his head & dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. not like there arent the same village screamers demanding a rapist be left alone
hm

if i choose which camp to be in, i will take the village screamer that say no to rape.

and i am talking about the people that have the money for those actual swiss accounts you talk about. they are demanding

but really, if you have lost touch with reality so much that you think all us saying no to rape have swiss acct... not surprised with your position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. you borrow my trope & you didn't even get the point.
i'm a foreigner, btw, not a villager.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. nah.... you arent. just more of your story you tell self. good try though. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. whatever you say, ms solipsist. no other minds in the universe but yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. saying no to rape is really really easy. what can i say. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. non-seq. not unexpected in conversations with solipsists. cause they're only talking to themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. ya, you and yours ignore rape. non seq for all of you. hence the problem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. lol lol. cute. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. forty fuckin eight days is the renegin you all were yelling about. forty fuckin eight days
and the judge was way out there, throwin the fuckin book at him

48 days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. what;s a renegin? whatever it is, i never said word one about 48 days.
you only hear yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. no. no one said what the out of control judge was all about. just he is reneging on plea deal
Edited on Wed Sep-30-09 08:39 AM by seabeyond
bad judge, so unffair.... he made the asshole run. he was gonna throw book at little ole, poor picked on polanski.... make him serve

well fuck

48 fuckin days to finish out the 90 days

you are right

you guys never said what the out of control bad judge was going to do to asshole polanski.

48 days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. i think you're typing too fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gwendolyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
37. I hope you never plan to go for your P.I. license.

But with all your investigative sleuthing and frothing obsession with this case, you'd think you would have at least improved your reading comprehension a little. :rofl:

It wasn't about "48 days." While those may have been the sarcastic words that came out of the judge's mouth, in actuality, what he meant was that Polanski would probably be facing many years in prison, plus deportation. That's been confirmed by the prosecutor, and that's why Polanski ran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. shit. life is just really unfair. you were able to get to my post thru your god forsaken country
you are stuck in

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. not me- i keep my all funds in lichtenstein.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
45. All my assets are tied up in gold dubloons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. what i don't get is this... he could have just done his time and been done with it
instead of running. now his sister in law was on the today show saying how our system is broken and it wasn't rape even though he had sex with a 12 or 13 year old. wtf is that!! it shouldn't be rape if the boy is 15 and the girl is 13, but how the hell old was polanski!! it was RAPE!! a 13 year old who is with an adult... and one who she probably trusted as an adult who instead got her drunk and drugged and had sex with her.... you would think since he ran he was sentenced to like 40 years or something. 48 days!! wtf! oh, and since it's been so long, we should just all forget about it. yeah, right. that in the same breath as she said she went to the parole hearing for that girl from the mansons to make sure she didn't get out of prison. I know it's not the same thing... murder and rape.... but it's funny how a woman who was dying who spent how many years in prison shouldn't be allowed out to die with her family... while this guy evades his sentence for decades and now everyone should just let it go. if this manson woman had evaded her sentence for twenty or thirty years, would tate's sister be saying to let bygones be bygones??? i don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. exactly. and was RAPE. 13 yr old said no, stop, take me home, several times.
he was 44

but your post is exactly right

all these people are saying rape dopes not matter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. Toss him in jail for the rest of his life.
Edited on Wed Sep-30-09 08:22 AM by Odin2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dugaresa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
40. Holy shit, the judge was fearful of not sentencing him harshly?? is that what I read?
"In the February hearing, Espinoza mentioned a documentary film, "Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired," that depicts backroom deals between prosecutors and a media-obsessed judge who was worried his image would suffer if he didn't send Polanski to prison. "

What the f*ck?

the judge was worried that he would suffer if he didn't send him to prison, why because ole Roman was some director? cuz he was famous? and this judge was media obsessed and didn't want to upset the hollywood elite?

This article makes me think he should go to prison for 3 years at the very least and get time tacked on for running.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
44. There are varying stories on this. I've read 50 years and 100 years.
Here is another account:

Polanski was released after 42 days of his 90-day term, but here the story gets complicated. Polanski had been led to believe by Rittenband that after Chino, his time behind bars would be over. However, the judge was overheard boasting at his country club that he would put Polanski away "for 100 years".

This was just part of Rittenband's bizarre behaviour. We learn from Zenovich's film that the judge, anxious to impress on the media that he was in control of proceedings, twice proposed to prosecuting Assistant District Attorney Roger Gunson and to Polanski's defence lawyer Douglas Dalton that they should plead their cases to him, after which he would pronounce a sentence that he had decided beforehand – in effect, amounting to a mock trial. We learn that Rittenband was inordinately influenced by publicity, and that, quite inappropriately, he solicited other people's advice on how he should act: one of them, reporter Richard Brenneman, who was startled to be asked, "What the hell do I do with Polanski?"

In the documentary, Geimer says of Rittenband, "He didn't care what happened to me, and he didn't care what happened to Polanski. He was orchestrating some little show ' that I didn't want to be in." Even Gunson comments – and this is the prosecutor, mark you – "I'm not surprised that left under those circumstances."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/roman-polanski-the-truth-about-his-notorious-sex-crime-949106.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
49. You know what? WHO GIVES A SHIT?
Jeezus this whole country is fucking obsessed with celebrity scandals.

You are all playing a fiddle while Rome is burning.

Enough already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. no. has nothing to do with cleebrity. has nothing to do with scandal. has everything to do
with a girl, being raped adn that raped dismissed or ignored.

it has everything to do with today. our youths of both genders.

and that is why i give a shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC