Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

rediculous. just rediculous.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:29 AM
Original message
rediculous. just rediculous.
is this the most common du spelling error? Or just the most irritating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. ah hahahahaha. i was going to say, ridiculous. ridiculous. my pet peeve
in spelling. and yes, so common i thought you misspelled, looked at your name and thought wtf.... surprised you spelled rediculous. lol lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Tow the line. That one always gets me hoppin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Like many of these errors, "tow the line" results from listening but not reading.
People spell things the way they sound because they have never read the correct version. This is exacerbated in this particular case by the fact that one could theoretically "tow" a line (dragging it behind you, I guess), although the image makes no sense in sentences like "republicans always tow the line".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. irregardless of weather your rite or not
its rediculoulsy assnine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. I really like "assnine" - it makes me smile every time... (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. irregardless!!! my grammar pet peeve. ok, one of them.
Edited on Wed Sep-30-09 12:36 PM by ellenfl
'nucular' and 'realator' are two others. as a real estate paralegal, i have to stop myself from asking realtors how they spell that mispronunciation. :eyes:

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Waist of bandwith?
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. c'mon. I happen to know this bugs you too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. The most common error is using "it's" for "its".
Not just on DU, everywhere. Why these two three-letter words, with one meaning "it is" and the other meaning "of it" simply cannot be spelled correctly by Americans baffles me. I learned the rule in elementary school and have never forgotten it. Am I alone?

Sure you have your "rediculous" and your "loose" instead of "lose" (argh), but the inability to spell "its" is the most irritating to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. that's definitely a contender but using it's for its is not a spelling error
it's grammatical in nature. And then there's using the possessive when you mean to use the plural. Just saw someone repeatedly write "the Israeli's" when they meant "the Israelis."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. I hate the apostrophized plurals too!
Especially people who use it arbitrarily, as in "the student's picked up their books". Why not "book's" then??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. I think the its/it's misspellings has a lot to do with the confusing nature of English.
I see a lot of people use "it's" as a way of saying "of it" because we tend to use apostrophes to denote possession. It's only in this one particular case where there's already a word "it's" that means "it is", so you can't use the apostrophe for possession or you'd have two words spelled the same but meaning different things (I know there are many other incidences of this in the English language). I'm perfectly capable of using the proper form of it's/its, but just about every time I see "its" written, something in the back of my mind says that there should be an apostrophe there. In fact, the only time that it would really make perfect sense to me would be if "its" is used as a way of saying that there is more than one "it" as in "Look at all those its over there!".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. If it's any comfort, this "error" will eventually be deemed "correct".
That's how languages change. Dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. If enough people use "it's" as a possessive, for a long enough time, it will become first "acceptable" and then ultimately "correct". I'm sure purists like me posted to long-ago forums complaining about how "thee" and "thy" were being replaced by the obviously incorrect "you" and "your".

I agree that it's a confusing situation. But there is a rule, it's pretty easy, and schoolchildren used to be taught the rule and they learned it for the most part. Now they seem not to. It's like the annoying (to me) "she gave a gift to my wife and I" grammar mistake. Again, there's a rule, it's easy, I learned it in 4th grade. But this error is heard everywhere and is even made by professional speakers and writers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Road to hoe" instead of the correct "row to hoe" really gets my goat.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. And while I'm at it: The overuse of the terms: "At the end of the day" ...
"Absolutely"
"That said ..."

Cease and desist! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. It is what it is....
my new peeve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. "To be perfectly honest..." or "I'll be honest with you..."
Oh. Really? Just this once?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. My favorite for a while was "going ROUGE".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. That'd make me red in the face, LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. Depends on the poster making the error...
Sometimes it's funny, and sometimes it's hilarious.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
42. Then their our the times that
its hylarieous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. No. There's another spelling error that happens alot more than the others, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. flame bait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yesphan Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. Around here
it's "physical year".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. This thread is a looser.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks. Your welcome.
I hate that!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. "tongue and cheek" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. There, their, and they're mixups
Oh, and would of, should of, could of............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. During my junior year of High School...
I was visiting an acquaintance at his locker when a paper fell from it. I picked it up and I saw it was a test on the proper use of they're/there/their. It was a bunch of sentences and you had to fill in the blank with the appropriate word. I noticed that he got a 30% on the test and immediately I couldn't help thinking that a monkey picking randomly would likely have done better than he did. We were in the same grade, but he was obviously in a remedial English program. Some people just have a very hard time with words. When speaking to the guy, he didn't seem stupid, just sometimes a little slow. I hear now he's working as a coach for the UW Football Badgers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
44. Oh, yes...
the would of, could of folks are really irritating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. Spelling I can live with. It's the bloody homonym abuse that really gets my goat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
22. "Spitting image"
Some people assume the original phrase is "spittin' image," when of course it's "spi't 'n' image," as in "spirit and image."

And, of course, "chomping at the bit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. spitting image
Toward the end of the 19th century we find 'spit and image'. In 1895, an author called E. Castle published Lt. of Searthey, containing the line:

"She's like the poor lady that's dead and gone, the spit an' image she is."

Finally, we get to the first known use of 'spitting image' - in A. H. Rice's Mrs. Wiggs, 1901:

"He's jes' like his pa - the very spittin' image of him!"

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/spitting-image.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
23. I see that alot. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
24. Hipocracy
There are many permutations of hypocrisy, and they all drive me mad.

I do not desire to live in a country ruled by horses, no matter how benevolent their reign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pool Hall Ace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
26. My irritation is nevermind. That is a title of a Nirvana album.
Oh, never mind. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
27. Your such a looser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
28. "Whinning". It's WHINING.
Edited on Wed Sep-30-09 11:57 AM by CakeGrrl
"Should of" - SHOULD HAVE

And nevermind conflating plurals with possessives.

Oh yeah..."mute point" instead of MOOT point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. tounge, looser
i know a neocon who spells pelosi as palouse. WTH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilyhunter Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
30. I am so , SO glad I joined DU!
I'm surrounded by like-minded purists. I love you.

One of my (many) pet peeves is "noone". "No one" should use that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
35. Apparantly, definatly not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
36. I thought "marshall law" was the big offender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I love Marshall Law!!
Isn't that the new ABC comedy featuring Penny Marshall as a 60+ year old divorcee going back to law school so she can finally pass the bar as she wanted to decades ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. I'm guilty of THAT one.
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Using IS for ARE. "There's a lot of fish in the sea." Argggghhh.
I hear it on NPR and read it here all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
40. It's the use of apostrophes on every word that ends with the letter "S".
"Its" is used as a possessive pronoun. Too many people, however, spell it "it's".

"It's" is a contraction for "It is" or "It was".

There are numerous other instances where people put apostrophes on every word that end with an "s".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enuegii Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
41. "Phase" for "faze" gives me the howling fantods.
Funny, DU's spell checker flags "fantods". And, no, David Foster Wallace didn't invent that one... it's been around for at least a couple of hundred years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
43. 'Your' for 'you're' really gets me.
Then there's 'seperate' instead of 'separate'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC