Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$388 million patent verdict against Microsoft overturned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:11 PM
Original message
$388 million patent verdict against Microsoft overturned
$388 million patent verdict against Microsoft overturned

A federal court has reversed an earlier ruling that Microsoft's product activation technology infringed on software maker Uniloc's patent, overturning a record $388 million verdict.

Judge William Smith of the US District Court for the District of Rhode Island has overturned a $388 million patent-infringement verdict against Microsoft. A jury had found the company had infringed on a patent held by software maker Uniloc, a Singapore-based security company, sticking Microsoft with the largest patent penalty on record, but the court has now ruled in the software giant's favor. "We are pleased that the court has vacated the jury verdict and entered judgment in favor of Microsoft," a Microsoft spokesperson told Ars.

In April 2009, a US grand jury in Providence, Rhode Island ordered Microsoft to pay Uniloc a patent-law record $388 million for infringing an antipiracy software patent, concluding that Redmond intentionally infringed on Uniloc's patented technology as part of the product activation methods in Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, and Office XP.

Uniloc makes antipiracy tools that require user registration to prevent the same copy of software from being installed on more than one computer. Uniloc claimed that Australian Ric Richardson, who received the patent over 11 years ago, showed his program to Microsoft in 1993 under a pledge that the company would not duplicate it, but that Microsoft did. Microsoft argued that it used a different method for registering software because it found Richardson's software to be useless and that Uniloc's patent (No. 5,490,216) was obvious.

http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/09/record-388-million-verdict-against-microsoft-overturned.ars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Borg wins again..resistance is futile!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC