Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nat'l Review and Political Cesspool's Derbyshire says women should not have the right to vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:13 PM
Original message
Nat'l Review and Political Cesspool's Derbyshire says women should not have the right to vote
Edited on Wed Sep-30-09 03:14 PM by ccharles000
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/13269/natl-review-and-political-cesspools-derbyshire-says-women-should-not-have-the-right-to-vote

Conservative writer John Derbyshire went on Alan Colmes's radio show and showed his not-so-inner bigot and misogynist. I'll just let him speak for himself. (Think Progress):

John Derbyshire, a British-American conservative author and columnist for the National Review, has written a new book titled We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism. The book contains a section called "The Case Against Female Suffrage." Yesterday on his radio show, Alan Colmes asked Derbyshire to articulate his argument.

DERBYSHIRE: Among the hopes that I do not realistically nurse is the hope that female suffrage will be repealed. But I'll say this - if it were to be, I wouldn't lose a minute's sleep.

COLMES: We'd be a better country if women didn't vote?

DERBYSHIRE: Probably. Don't you think so?

COLMES: No, I do not think so whatsoever.

DERBYSHIRE: Come on Alan. Come clean here -laughing-.

COLMES: We would be a better country? John Derbyshire making the statement, we would be a better country if women did not vote.

DERBYSHIRE: Yeah, probably.

Did I mention that Derbyshire has a wife, Rosie and two children, Dannie and Nellie? I wonder how those views go over in that household. He also said that he would like to repeal the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you "shouldn't try to force people to be good." Well, in spite of that law, we still see a ton of racism out there. Obviously you can't force people to renounce their racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kay Bailey Hutchinson has spoken against the 19th Amendment
Anyone who thinks this fight is settled is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Didn't Ann Coulter say the same?
wicked people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes
"What can I say about my gender; we're not that bright" when discussing the fact that women favored Kerry over W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. A better country for whom?
Certainly not for 51 percent of us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not for any of us.
When any member of society enjoys fewer rights than any other, we all lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. This freak must really be scared of loosing forever
If he wants to totally eliminate the feminine voice. He must be terrified that his hate and rage patriarchy (white patriarchy) might loose out to balanced discussion if he is proposing this. These monsters are feeling some pain to go this far in the open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. pathetic and sad....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. well, they also think that poor people, non-whites, college students
and anyone else who may lean toward sanity should not vote.

Seriously. Quite a few Republicans think that voting should NOT be the voice of the people. For evidence, look no further than their attacks on Acorn, their purging of voter rolls, and other forms of voter suppression. They KNOW they are not in the majority, even when they bluster that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's sad that he doesn't see his contentment with white male privilege
as a problem.

Most people know it's wrong, and if they feel that way, they try to hide it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm sure he sees it as white male burden NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. I agree - Republican women shouldn't vote; let their menfolk do all the voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbarber Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. You think he let's his wife and daughters have views?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, following his logic here
"He also said that he would like to repeal the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you 'shouldn't try to force people to be good.' "

He must think we should repeal EVERY law governing our behavior in a civilized society, because they're all just forcing us to be good. IOW, he's an anarchist, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. Pathetic loser
Some conservatives want the 50s back. This one wants the pre20s back. Good luck with that, asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Given the book title, why take it seriously?
I think Derbyshire is a troll, in the sense of saying outrageous thing for the shock value more than because he wants or expects anyone to take it seriously. He likes railing about furriners and building a fence to keep out illegal aliens, but his wife is Asian and he doesn't hide the fact that he used to be an illegal alien himself. Go figure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. Deport the fucker back to Britain.
If he tries to come back to the US, throw him in the Atlantic and tell him to swim home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here's Derbyshire's travelogue from New Orleans
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OGYzYzI5NzU3ZmEyYWEwYjg5MjBiODdmN2ZmMGE1ZDg=

From the tourist’s-eye view, New Orleans is a black city. The servicepeople at the airport, the hotel, concessions, stores, museums, and fast-food outlets are uniformly black. Most of the people you pass on the street, outside the tourist precincts, are black. I think this is the blackest American city I have been in....

As usual on my first morning in a new city, I left my hotel Saturday morning for a half-hour stroll, to wake myself up, get some flavor of the place, and buy a newspaper and some drugstore items. Walking west and north several blocks from my hotel — the Ambassador on Tchoupitoulas — I did not find a single drugstore, nor any kind of small convenience store of any kind. Nor did I see any boarded-up stores abandoned because of Katrina. I saw nothing but streets full of blank frontages that seemed to have nothing much going on behind them. I suppose some of them were residential, and some commercial, but a lot were just empty ruins — ruins that plainly pre-dated Katrina.


That's because you were in the Warehouse District, ding-dong. If you'd gone the other way, to Canal Street, you would have found two Walgreens and innumerable touristy gift shops-cum-convenience stores. :P Care for more? Here's Derb on crime:

These were educated white liberals — they had been dormitory mates at Harvard — who had returned to New Orleans after Katrina to do good works in “the community.” The husband, a doctor, ran a clinic that turned no one away. The wife... well, let the Times-Picayune tell it:...

What happened to this young couple was unspeakably horrible, and there is of course no excusing such barbarism. It is hard, though, not to shake your head at the couple’s unworldly naivety. What kind of people did they think they were going to encounter when they got down and dirty with “the community”? The Times-Picayune story quoted a neighbor of the couple saying this: “They would never do it, but they should have answered the door with a gun.” Hard to disagree with that — either part of it.


That'd be cold enough even if the victim, Helen Hill, hadn't been a friend of a friend of a friend of mine. :grr: :banghead:

The late New Orleans blogger Ashley Morris had a word for people like Derbyshire. The word is "fuckmook".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC