NYT on Iraq Withdrawal: "Leaving Iraq is a Feat That Requires an Army"

[HamdenRice]

More change we can believe in!

For those of you interested in the complications that make just "bringing them home now" difficult, it's an interesting piece, about the incredible scale of the withdrawal so far:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/world/middleeast/09pullout.html

Leaving Iraq Is a Feat That Requires an Army
By MARC SANTORA
Published: October 8, 2009

JOINT BASE BALAD, Iraq — There is no more visible sign that America is putting the Iraq war behind it than the colossal operation to get its stuff out: 20,000 soldiers, nearly a sixth of the force here, assigned to a logistical effort aimed at dismantling some 300 bases and shipping out 1.5 million pieces of equipment, from tanks to coffee makers.

It is the largest movement of soldiers and matériel in more than four decades, the military said.

By itself, such a withdrawal would be daunting, but it is further complicated by attacks from an insurgency that remains active; the sensitivities of the Iraqi government about a visible American presence; disagreements with the Iraqis about what will be left for them; and consideration for what equipment is urgently needed in Afghanistan.

All the while, the Army must sustain its current force of about 124,000 troops across the country, trucking in fuel, food and other essential supplies while determining what to leave behind for the 50,000 troops who will remain in a mostly advisory role until 2011.

...

But just as the buildup in the Kuwaiti desert before the 2003 invasion made it plain that the United States was almost certain to go to war, the preparations for withdrawal just as clearly point to the end of the American military role here. Reversing the process, even if Iraq’s relative stability deteriorates into violence, becomes harder every day.

[HamdenRice]

1. shameless self kick for the weekend nt

[Kaylee]

2. K & R.