So I am wondering......
Back in 1994 there was an article about how the RW was suddenly up in arms over an idea the first bush had, Outcome Based Education - aka, OBE.
Clinton proposed something similar and the fundies were up in arms suddenly.
bush 2 gets into office, renames it and once more the rw is for it and dems against it...
Here is the 1994 article: (A VERY interesting read)
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_new_school_warsHere is a rw screed against it:
http://www.usiap.org/Viewpoints/Society/Education/OutcomeBasedEducation.htmlFrom wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outcome-based_educationYes - The two have differences but are similar in general concept.
Both parties were for and against it - and not just talking specifics as can be seen in the links.
How is it that something both parties at some point has said was bad is now something that has been passed and is still there (the left didn't like nclb and could fix it, but have not yet talked about it even to my knowledge, I could be wrong on that of course).
Just seems...well, odd.