Orrex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:21 PM
Original message |
Someone please give a summary of the speech that doesn't start with "Obama is Bush" |
|
and doesn't end with "we're fucked."
And just for the hell of it let's keep the use of "betrayed" to a minimum, too.
Thanks lots.
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
subsuelo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
arcadian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He betrayed us. We're fucked.
|
Orrex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I'm supposed to trust you, when you can't even read the OP? |
arcadian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I only used one betrayed and I didn't call you a cheerleader or post cute pictures of cheerleaders. :P
|
Orrex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. I call that a failure to commit. |
|
This thread is useless without...
|
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
14. Pretty much in that order. |
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
5. How about "we're just fucked"? n/t |
C_Lawyer09
(690 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Very different than Bush |
|
Acknowledged the risks, what is at stake, what we will attempt to do, but most importantly established a clear timeline for our mission to be accomplished. Regardless of all the heat I've taken and will continue to take. Pakistani nuke security is a big issue, moreso than most on du will admit. I was surprisingly impressed with the acuity and directness of his speech.
|
Orrex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
I agree with you re: Pakistan. I've heard nothing to suggest that the nukes are "safe" in any useful sense of the word, so the security of that nation strikes me as very important.
|
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. But it won't hurt for long! It will just be a mushroom cloud and it will be all over.... You... |
|
won't feel a thing, trust me....
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
15. Oh, brother. You can't secure Pakistani nukes in AFGANISTAN. |
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I actually think we got to the second 9/11 before he lost me... n/t |
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. He lost me when he started talking about "Vietnamazation" |
|
Obama isn't Bush - he's Nixon.
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. LOL tell me he didn't! |
|
I didn't watch it.
He actually said Vietnamization?!
aaargh
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
22. No - he started talking about training the Afghanis to take over more of the fight |
|
it just sounded like it. Same tune, slightly different words. You know, the old "when they stand up, we'll stand down" sort of talk.
But all I could think was "Vietnamazation".
And turned to the Law and Order rerun.
|
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
17. 911 ...... 30K next month ...... maybe out by 06/12 ....... we're broke, but ixnay on the egativenay |
bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Well the camel is already in the tent so there's no point in suggesting it isn't... |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-01-09 10:37 PM by bridgit
But Obama was clearly threading a needle between several concerns with many of those being very deadly and unpalatable as such
He seemed to be teetering in his palm a handful of key poetries in such a way that they were hoped to justify if not placate these very opinions being turned back on him at this hour, and many here knew it would be thus; while standing before the belly of the beast in the occasional silence & stillness he was less able to read as quickly as I thought he needed to as he paused a word or two a phrase, it's not that he seemed to leave the impression that he was a fish out of water - more like he was flushed with the knowledge he is but one fish in a rolling ocean
I bet that will be a 'wear & wash' dress shirt he takes back upstairs, cause that was a very grim audience and rightly so
|
Telly Savalas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message |
19. It's not that long. You're best off reading it yourself. |
Orrex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. Thank you for the link, but... |
|
I was actually sort of trying to make a point about (just about) every other thread I've seen in GD and GDP so far tonight.
Still, thanks for the link.
|
LeftyMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Obama can't seem to decide if he's Nixon or LBJ. We're blowin' Afghanis up for their own good. |
|
And they're not doing good enough yet so we're gonna blow 'em up some more. Good night and God Bless America.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-01-09 10:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
1.- Timeline to end of this, 2011... (and no use of when they stand up we stand down)
2.- We are there to contain and defeat the threat (very real mind you) that resides in Warizistan, to both the Paki state (and their nukes) and us. (And very poorly articulated but that is the strategic reason)
3.- We are getting the help of allies, including India (not made clear how)
4- We are co opting local leaderships and going around Karzai, which fuck we need to recognize but not work with.
Cliff notes.
Oh and for the we are fucked crowd...
Yes there was a history that had to have 9.11 because this started on 9.11 and the mandatory we are fucked mostly because I am scratching my head as to how we will pay for this. But I have hopes that doing thorugh the regular process and kicking contractors out will help.
Oh and I am sure some folks in DOD are thinking we are fucked. If this works, big if, the plebes in the audience tonight will not get to punch an infantry combat badge...
:hi:
There you go, cliffs notes. and high points.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:23 AM
Response to Original message |