Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America Without a Middle Class-Elizabeth Warren

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:27 AM
Original message
America Without a Middle Class-Elizabeth Warren
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 08:34 AM by AllentownJake
Can you imagine an America without a strong middle class? If you can, would it still be America as we know it?

Today, one in five Americans is unemployed, underemployed or just plain out of work. One in nine families can't make the minimum payment on their credit cards. One in eight mortgages is in default or foreclosure. One in eight Americans is on food stamps. More than 120,000 families are filing for bankruptcy every month. The economic crisis has wiped more than $5 trillion from pensions and savings, has left family balance sheets upside down, and threatens to put ten million homeowners out on the street.

Families have survived the ups and downs of economic booms and busts for a long time, but the fall-behind during the busts has gotten worse while the surge-ahead during the booms has stalled out. In the boom of the 1960s, for example, median family income jumped by 33% (adjusted for inflation). But the boom of the 2000s resulted in an almost-imperceptible 1.6% increase for the typical family. While Wall Street executives and others who owned lots of stock celebrated how good the recovery was for them, middle class families were left empty-handed.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-warren/america-without-a-middle_b_377829.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reminder
K&R if you are recing otherwise it goes away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Do you mean an r without a k will allow a thread to drop? If so, I agree.
Does this count as a k? jk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Nothing is more frustrating than watching recs pile up
and a thread sink. I don't want recs, I want people to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. maybe you're doing some of that to yourself
rather than engage in conversation about the FACT that Clinton's team knew the economy would turn an election, you have a headline dismissal of this fact.

what solutions do you offer that can persuade rather than dismiss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Bill Clinton's economic team got lucky
An invention that increased productivity and changed American life happened to hit the stage during his term.

Without the PC, than the internet, Bill Clinton was destined for some serious trouble.

You can't really credit Larry Summers and Bob Rubin for a technological innovation. The only thing they did that was reasonably intelligent was to ban sales tax for a while on on-line sales to encourage it's development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I can't really credit Larry Summer for anything. He's a pimple on the ass of humanity
as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. He is a horrible man
and one of the first people brought in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick. IT'S THE ECONOMY, STUPID, as Clinton knew n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Than he passed NAFTA nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. the point is that Clinton knew his election rested on the economy
that doesn't mean Clinton was prescriptive, although Obama obviously is playing from the same book, in terms of economic ideas.

unlike Clinton, Obama doesn't have a dot com bubble to sustain his presidency. He has to work on creating JOBS that the private sector cannot because they're too busy counting their government bail out money and giving bonuses to the already rich.

the point stands. the economy will play a decisive role in the election unless the democrats do something to change the game, even if their corporate masters don't like it. Sometimes even they have to bite the bullet, as in FDR's presidency, and stave off financial collapse and the social upheaval that creates.

if we get to that point, it won't matter who is paying off whom. I guess Goldman thinks it will be biz as usual since they're arming themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. When faced with a total collapse of the banking industry
FDR did provide funds to the banks to stabilize and also imposed regulations at the same time.

My fear is the critical mistake of not tackling financial reform in 2009, will be his undoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. It was disgusting to see
it was an embarrassment to see the democrats ignore those who work for a living. it was a slap in the face and yet more b.s. trickle-down economics, which Greenspan had already admitted did not work.

I have not been impressed with what Obama has done with the support he received. On the one hand, I realize as a black man he has to work against prejudice. At the same time, his entire economic team is complicit in the mess. They aren't the solution.

but god forbid Steiglitz or Krugman might offer alternatives... or this women, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. They under estimated the problem
They thought this was 1993 again and that a couple tweaks and FED manipulations would stem unemployment. It wasn't till July of this year they woke up that their initial solution was not going to alleviate the unemployment problem.

This entire Presidency appears to be fighting the battles lost in 1993 instead of trying to address the problems of 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Old men attempting to rewrite the failures of their youth - who does that remind you of?
Too bad Obama got captured by them (whether it was his choice or not).

"This entire Presidency appears to be fighting the battles lost in 1993 instead of trying to address the problems of 2009."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Here's a kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC