Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The REAL reason the Republicans are attacking the Fed!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:58 AM
Original message
The REAL reason the Republicans are attacking the Fed!

The Democrats need to STOP helping the Republicans attack the Fed! It's a TRICK! The republicans are just trying to bullying Bernanke into helping them get rid of THIS!

>>>>>>>>>>

Humphrey–Hawkins Full Employment Act

A bill to establish and translate into practical reality the right of all adult Americans able, willing, and seeking to work to full opportunity for useful paid employment at fair rates of compensation; to combine full employment, production, and purchasing power goals with proper attention to balanced growth and national priorities; to mandate such national economic policies and programs as are necessary to achieve full employment, production, and purchasing power; to restrain inflation; and to provide explicit machinery for the development and implementation of such economic policies and programs.

Enacted by U.S. Congress
Date signed October 27, 1978
Introduced by Augustus Hawkins
Amendments
None notable, see end of article

The Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act (Pub.L. 95-523, 92 Stat. 1887, enacted October 27, 1978, 15 U.S.C. § 3101–3152, Humphrey–Hawkins Full Employment Act), is an act of federal legislation by the United States government.


Impetus and strategy

Unemployment and inflation levels began to rise in the early 1970s, reviving familiar fears of an economic recession. In the past, the country's economic policy had been defined by the Employment Act of 1946, which encouraged the federal government to pursue "maximum employment, production, and purchasing power" through cooperation with private enterprise. Some Congressmen, dissatisfied with the vague wording of this act, sought to create an amendment that would strengthen and clarify the country's economic policy.

As before, Congress turned to Keynesian economic theory for a solution, which emphasized economic control through manipulation of demand-side factors. In particular, the government can minimize the shock of business fluctuations by compensatory spending, essentially inflating investment levels with deficit-funded government spending.

Furthermore, Congress encouraged the government to develop a sound monetary policy, controlling inflation and pushing toward full employment by managing the amount and liquidity of currency in circulation.

As a last resort, Congress believed that unemployment could be temporarily relieved by the creation of government jobs as they did during the Great Depression.

Finally, Congress sought to involve more elements of the federal government in the economic policy process, and to clarify the role of those elements that were already involved. In particular, the central bank of the United States, the Federal Reserve, and the Presidency.

Overview
In response to rising unemployment levels in the 1970s, Representative Augustus Hawkins and Senator Hubert Humphrey created the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act. It was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 27, 1978, and codified as 15 USC § 3101. The Act explicitly instructs the nation to strive toward four ultimate goals: full employment, growth in production, price stability, and balance of trade and budget. By explicitly setting requirements and goals for the federal government to attain, the Act is markedly stronger than its predecessor. {An alternate view is that the 1946 Act concentrated on employment, and Humphrey-Hawkins, by specifying four competing and possibly inconsistent goals, de-emphasized full employment as the sole primary national economic goal]. In brief, the Act:

Explicitly states that the federal government will rely primarily on private enterprise to achieve the four goals.
Instructs the government to take reasonable means to balance the budget.
Instructs the government to establish a balance of trade, i.e. to avoid trade surpluses or deficits.
Mandates the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve to establish a monetary policy that maintains long-run growth, minimizes inflation, and promotes price stability.
Instructs the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve to transmit an Monetary Policy Report to the Congress twice a year outlining its monetary policy.
Requires the President to set numerical goals for the economy of the next fiscal year in the Economic Report of the President and to suggest policies that will achieve these goals.
Requires the Chairman of the Federal Reserve to connect the monetary policy with the Presidential economic policy.
The Act set specific numerical goals for the President to attain. By 1983, unemployment rates should be not more than 3% for persons aged 20 or over and not more than 4% for persons aged 16 or over, and inflation rates should not be over 4%. By 1988, inflation rates should be 0%. The Act allows Congress to revise these goals as time progresses.

If private enterprise is lacking in power to achieve these goals, the Act expressly allows the government to create a "reservoir of public employment." These jobs are required to be in the lower ranges of skill and pay so as to not draw the workforce away from the private sector.

The Act directly prohibits discrimination on account of gender, religion, race, age, and national origin in any program created under the Act.

Amendments

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humphrey%E2%80%93Hawkins_Full_Employment_Act\

CONSERVATIVES ARE PATHOLGICAL LIARS AND NOBODY IN OUR PARTY SHOULD BE HELPING THEM DO ANYTHING BECAUSE THEY ARE ALWAYS LYING ABOUT THEIR TRUE MOTIVES!

I'm not against auditing the Fed because data is never a bad thing BUT Bernanke is getting attacked for OTHER reasons! He's a middle of the road economist and they want to replace him with another Greenspan! We need to keep the Fed in OUR hands and right now that means Bernanke!

I have to go to work today but if you listen carefully to the hearing you'll see what I mean when the Republicans ask about unemployment. They will be talking about this.


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think it has to do more with Ron Paul nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2.  Paul can't be trusted!
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 09:01 AM by Joanne98
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No he's crazy
But the GOP move against the FED after 30 years of worshiping it is tied to the Paultards.

Alan Grayson is moving for transparency as well, and Bernie Sanders is moving against Bernake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Ben is a Keynesian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC