if it was proposed by the other party.
Many liberals and liberal groups got everyone on board to back the public option ... thereby silencing the not for profit advocates.
IMO we need to keep the baby boom generation in mind, insurance companies have seen a decline in customers, and as this article states the real trouble begins in 2011 when the number of Medicare enrollees moves from 46 million to 79 million.
Private insurance companies push for 'individual mandate'
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jun/07/business/fi-healthcare7"...Still, industry observers say, private insurers need the government's help to transform some of the nation's 45 million uninsured residents into paying customers.
...The industry's real trouble begins in 2011, when 79 million baby boomers begin turning 65. Health insurers stand to lose a huge slice of their commercially insured enrollment (estimated at 162 million to 172 million people) over the next two decades to Medicare, the government-funded health insurance program for seniors. "The rate of aging far and away exceeds the birth rate," said Sheryl Skolnick, a CRT Capital Group healthcare investment analyst."This time, you get the sense something is going to happen," he said. "So to stand up and just say no is probably not wise, because politically you could get run over."
For insurers, getting "run over" would be the adoption of a so-called single-payer plan, in which the government pays all medical bills. Such a plan, though widely viewed as politically unfeasible this year, would wreak havoc on the private insurance market.
The best way for the industry to preserve the private insurance market -- and derail the campaign for a single-payer system -- may be to go along with more palatable proposals on the table now, said Jeffrey Miles, a healthcare analyst and president of the Miles Organization, a Los Angeles insurance brokerage firm..."