Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This repubican hand wringing over government regs "strangling" small business .......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:22 AM
Original message
This repubican hand wringing over government regs "strangling" small business .......
..... makes me want to fucking hurl. I own a small business and have since 1993. Before that, I worked for a small business for many years.

Government regs have never been an issue. Rapacious BIG BUSINESS is the issue. The repubicans get the little guys to cheer for deregulation that actually HURTS little guys and gives freer reign to the big guys to pick the bones and pockets of the little guys.

And it goes unchallenged by those who are supposed to be on OUR side.

Gawd ...... I hate repubicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. i hear ya Stinky
my accountant used to turn purple at tax time when she'd hand me my quarterly bill, she'd sputter about people making 3x what I did on 'investment income' and paying nothing while I put out close to 40% of every profit dollar.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Same here. My husband has been in business since 1982
and our tax hit was right at 40% of every dollar. I just seethe when I hear Repigs talk about small business. I've never seen them do anything that helped "small" business.

One clue what they consider small: the Senate health care bill exempts small business from the employer mandate. They define this as employers with payrolls under $500,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. so true.
I've also wondered about when voters on the right complain about lobbyists corrupting the government, then in the same breath complains about the government being too large or full of regulations and whatnot. Don't they get that removing the government from the equation just makes the corporations who back those lobbyists that much more powerful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Pugsley argues that established banks created the Fed to stifle competition.
Edited on Fri Dec-04-09 10:08 AM by phasma ex machina
Using the argument that the public was often defrauded by charlatans who opened new banks and then fled with depositors' funds or who failed due to lack of sound banking practices, the established banks lobbied for government regulation of the banking industry. Of course, the established banks did not want to be controlled, they just wanted the legal power to make it difficult for new banks to enter the field, and wanted to prevent the banks that did get in from engaging in competitive practices that would affect the established banks' profits. - The Alpha Strategy


Suarez believes that Proctor & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, etc created the FDA to harass new competitors.

IMHO Tyson Foods exploits refugee programs to import unassimilated neo-slaves for use as cheap labor at its food processing plants.

IBM and the like consider themselves supranational, above all governments.

From my perspective Big Gov looks like a tool of Big Biz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. so your solution is to remove even the semblance of control
and allow Big Business to run amok without them having to worry about the government? I mean, if your problem is that Big Biz is running the government, that says we should strengthen the government, not allow Big Biz to operate without even a pretense of control.

It's like complaining about how there are crooked cops who allow criminals to get away with too much, then calling to abolish the police so this won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. My post merely offers anecdotal evidence of big biz existential symbiosis with big gov
- no solutions proffered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. that's productive.
Without solutions offered, it sounds like you are advocating a reduction of governmental power to regulate business, when a better solution would be a stronger set of regulatory powers which would try to prevent what you complain about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. More "be careful what you wish for, it just might come true."
Knaves always seem to somehow twist the most altruistic gov program.

Anyhow, you stay gold.
My own pessimism desperately needs a beat down. :spank: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. "Knaves always seem to somehow twist the most altruistic gov program."
True. They also will take advantage of any system, especially a lack of one.

Nothing wrong with being a pessimist or cynic: I am too. In fact, my cynicism is what wants me to NOT give corporations the free rein to do whatever they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've got a neighbor who runs a small business...
Over thanksgiving, he was spouting the GOP supply-side line. "Well, if they really want to stimulate the economy, they should lower taxes on small businesses."

I was tempted to ask him: "So, if your biz had lower taxes, how would that help your business stimulate the economy?"

But I know better than to bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't know of many small businesses that are even aware of the regs.
Usually because the regs only impact the big businesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. +1 The powers that be find it infinitely easier to control one big business with 50,000 employees
than 10,000 businesses with 5 employees. Big Gov and Big Biz, it's a symbiotic relationship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. I have to disagree that government regs have (never) been an
issue. I can give you an example: A friend of mine that owns an asphalt paving company was going to build a new equipment repair building. The building was to replace an old building in another location that he had been using for years. The first problem he ran into was he would have a couple men working in the building so he was required to put in a sewage system, couldn't use a port-a-john. He couldn't put a sewage system in because he had slightly less than an acre of ground, so he would have to purchase more ground. If you have an older home on say a quarter acre you are grandfathered in and it doesn't matter if you have ten people in the house. But because it would be new construction he needed a full acre of ground even though he only had two employees. Then he ran into another problem, even though it would only be used by his mechanics he was required to make the place handicap accessible for another several thousand dollars. What he finally ended up doing was just putting up a storage rental building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yep.
Sadly the GOP has used this issue to great effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. There are always exceptions that prove the rule. Just as there are stupid regs put in place .....
..... with good intent. I suspect your friend ran afoul of the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Other than the handicap accessible issue, it sounds like most of the
other issues were local township, city, county or state compliance codes. In my experience with small businesses, other than taxes the local regulations are far more oppressive than federal regulations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. And I hate some Dems for..
not telling these people where to get off,they usually go on with some long speech instead of getting to the point and telling them that its BULLSHIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's what the other side of the same coin does .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC