Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh boy. Custody battle between divorcee who says she's no longer gay and her ex-wife

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 07:13 PM
Original message
Oh boy. Custody battle between divorcee who says she's no longer gay and her ex-wife
I say oh boy, not because the case skates into unknown legal territory, but because fundies of Thomas Road Baptist Church are in the middle of it. Ms Miller, the birth mother, is emphatically "ex-gay", nattering on about the sin of homosexuality and the "homosexual agenda". She's withholding court ordered visitation rights from the woman she'd once joined in a civil union, and has charged her with molestation of their daughter. Naturally, Falwell's Liberty Counsel has been only too happy to represent her, and those idiots may cost her custody of her child in their pursuit of "Godliness".

http://www.newsweek.com/id/172554/output/print

Lisa Miller's blog:

http://imgodschild.wordpress.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is no doubt that more evil, pain and cruelty are perpetrated in the name of a god..
the god of your choice...than for any other reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No doubt......Organized religion has been the most destructive force in the history of humankind.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep. I agree 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scotchandsoda Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You are 100% correct. And it is why they maintain so much power.
Something must break that chain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. That about says it all.....blind ideology is a nasty, nasty companion...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. ah, this old canard
that might have been true prior to the 20th century.

considering the scores of millions killed, tortured, etc by atheists in the 20th century (mao, pol pot, stalin, etc.) it has no validity. consider that their regimes were also officially atheist, iow there were in many cases criminal sanctions to people practicing religion.

evil. pain. cruelty. they are part of the human condition. since most humans throughout history have BEEN religious, naturally they used religion to justify same

but considering that regimes that certainly had no religious motivation set records in the 20th century for murderous assholeness, this meme needs to die.

it's all cute and people love to sound profound saying it... but it simply aint so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. What an evil, wicked bitch. Just confirms to me how bad religion can
be for people. Good luck to Ms. Jenkins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. If she can sing, maybe she'll do a fundraiser next primary season
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is NO such animal.
"Ex-gay" does not exist. It is denial.
(This is directed at the "Ex-gay" bunch, not the OP)

I might have known Falwell's dipshit flunky underlings were all up in this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. I think that human sexuality is much more complex and convoluted than that.
I don't think that you can make any kind of blanket statement such as that, no matter how you approach human sexuality.

I had a girlfriend that I lived with for a number of year whose previous two relationships were with women. After we separated she married another guy, and stayed happily married until her early, untimely death.

Human sexuality is not cut and dried, I think that it is much more complex, with a spectrum of possible outcomes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can't think of anything worse for a child than a freak-ass fundie parent.
That poor kid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Newsweek article leaves out that custody has been granted to
Janet.

VT Judge Awards Custody to Non-Biological Mom
by Kilian Melloy
Monday Nov 30, 2009

Happier times: Isabella as an infant with her two mothers
Happier times: Isabella as an infant with her two mothers
Related Topics: anti-gay Christians | GLBT family equality | GLBT families
Email Print Share Buzz up!
A long-running custody dispute has culminated in a Vermont judge ordering the former partner of a child’s biological mother to assume custody of the child. The anti-gay Christian press says that the seven-year-old child, Isabella, is a "stranger" to her new custodial parent, Janet Jenkins, and that Isabella had "violent reactions" whenever she was in Jenkins’ care due to her "lesbian lifestyle." But according to lawyer and family court expert Kurt Hughes of Burlington, Vermont, the outcome is typical of certain custodial cases in which one parent repeatedly refuses to abide by a court-ordered custody arrangement.

"Even though it’s hit the headlines because this happens to be a same-sex couple, this is a very basic family law that we’re talking about," Hughes told local news station WCAX, which reported on the case in a Nov. 23 article.

"There’s something called parental alienation syndrome, in which one parent is constantly bad mouthing the other parent," Hughes explained. "And so the courts over the years have decided that the potential long term psychological impact to a child from that type of behavior is much greater than the temporary disruption that would result from a child changing households from one parent to the other." The biological mother, Lisa Miller, has been ordered to relinquish custody of daughter Isabella to Jenkins by the start of the new year. Miller will retain visitation rights. If she does not comply, she may end up in prison.

Vermont Family Court Judge William Cohen ruled that the change of custody was necessary because the dispute had the capacity to harm the child more than a change of custody would. Wrote Judge Cohen, "Ms. Miller’s interference with the relationship between (the child) and Ms. Jenkins have become so pervasive that it now outweighs the potential harm that could occur to the child by a chance of custody."

<snip>

http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=&sc2=news&sc3=&id=99531
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. But the kid is still with Miller - right? Does this come down to Virginia
ignoring Vermont as it relates to custody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. right. the kid is still with Miller and Cohen just ruled
on this. But Miller already lost once in VA re visitation and now she's in contempt of the VA courts as well as the VT courts. We'll see what happens from here on in, but I'm hopeful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabbycat31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. she's probably bi
or went back into the closet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. as in bi-atshit crazy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Or just an opportunist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. ugh... the GOP's next cover girl
she will probably be a keynote speaker at the 2012 convention...

i've seen some unconscionable things, but stealing a child from a spouse just out of hateful spite and then shutting her out while hiding behind the bible is near the top of the list...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Fortunately, both the VT and VA courts have made it clear that Miller
can't shut Jenkins out. And Judge Cohen has awarded full custody to Jenkins. We'll see where that goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. Which is precisely why the "law" needs to change
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 07:36 AM by SoCalDem
Any adult should be able to "partner/pair-bond/marry/share-a-life" with ANY other adult they choose.. It should be a legally binding "contract", but not necessarily a "marriage". Just a simple change in definition would solve a lot of issues.

If the pair decides they want GOD to weigh in, they can get "sanctified" b y the church.. but as far as the law should be concerned, the TWO ADULTS are legally bound into a contractual partnership, unless the contract needs to be dissolved at a future date. Until that time, those two adults would have all the same rights as any other pair of adults.. sanctified or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC