Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Australia Bans Aliens vs. Predator

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:08 PM
Original message
Australia Bans Aliens vs. Predator
Australia Bans Aliens vs. Predator
By Joe Dodson, 12/4/2009 9:20 PM

The fact that Australia banned Aliens vs. Predator is bad news for both Sega and Rebellion, but great news for non-Australian gamers. Skeptical? Wait until you read about why the game was banned.


The Australian Classification Board's review of Aliens vs. Predator is by far the most compelling copy written about the game to date, my own preview included (though in my defense, I didn't get to see the awesome things they saw). Here are the words of the Classification Board, as posted at Gamespot AU:


The game contains first-person perspective, close-up depictions of human characters being subjected to various types of violence, including explicit decapitation and dismemberment as well as locational damage such as stabbing through the chest, mouth, throat, or eyes.

Characters can be stabbed with a Predator's wrist blade or an Alien's tail in depictions reminiscent of impalement. The Predator collects 'trophies' by explicitly ripping off human heads, their spinal columns dangling from severed necks. Heads can be twisted completely around in order to break a character's neck. Eyes can be stabbed through or gouged, leaving empty, bloodied eye sockets.

It is noted that a player is able to combine manoeuvres together in quick succession, which further increases impact; for example, a Predator can stab a character through both eyes with its wrist blade and rip off their head, with spinal column still attached. Extensive post-mortem damage, including decapitation and dismemberment, is also possible.


F yeah. That copy just twisted my head completely around! "Eyes can be stabbed through or gouged, leaving empty, bloodied eye sockets." Oh Australian review board, I love it when you talk dirty. Wow, this game sounds awesome. Sorry dingos banned your baby, Sega, but at least you got some AWESOME press out of it!

http://www.atomicgamer.com/news/1720/australia-bans-aliens-vs-predator

Another viewpoint on it all:


Hey, Stop Blaming The Australian Government/People For "Banning" Games

December 5, 2009 by admin
Filed under Syndication

Leave a Comment

You know, every time a game is “banned” in Australia, I see people from the US and Europe saying stupid, stupid things. I’d like to try and put a stop to that. This morning, for example, I awoke to find Rebellion – the developers behind Aliens vs Predator – saying that they wouldn’t be making any changes to the game in light of its failure to secure classification in Australia . Were that simply from a business standpoint (ie, it’s too small a market to go back into the code), that’s fine. Whatever. But they went and provided an official statement on the matter , which said “We will not be releasing a sanitised or cut down version for territories where adults are not considered by their governments to be able to make their own entertainment choices.” See that, right there? It’s harsh. And it’s 100% bullshit. Whenever a game is refused classification in Australia – a move which effectively bans the game, since it is illegal to sell a game without a Classification Board rating attached – I hear the same old thing being said by publishers and gamers alike. That it’s either the fault of the Australian government, the Classification Board, or some underlying moral flaw in the Australian people. Let me tell you why games are continually “banned” in Australia. It is not, as you may believe, the fault of the Australian “government”.



from:
http://news.zergwatch.com/2009/12/05/hey-stop-blaming-the-australian-governmentpeople-for-banning-games-australia/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. always loved the alien/predator games, cant open the links at work
so i dont know if this is a completely new game, if so i hope i can get it for the Wii for my chrissies....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, I think this one is about the minutemen on the border
:rofl: :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. kewl lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Aussies very much have their panties in a wad when it comes to video games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You only need one more post to hit 1000! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Regret My New Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Read that second link he posted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. "It is not, as you may believe, the fault of the Australian “government”.
"to amend the classification laws, all six of Australia’s state Attorneys-General need to unanimously agree to the change. Five of them do, and have been for some time now. They’re reasonable people, who realise that adults should be free to choose their own adult forms of entertainment. But one – South Australia’s Michael Atkinson – does not."

Does anyone else see the contradiction here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jkid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Michael Atkinson is a mediaphobe who rather prefers R18+ rated films instread of video games
The only possible way to get around it is to amend the Classification Act to remove this provision and allow a majority or a super-majority vote. Or have this entire provision of having Attorney-Generals making the decision of new classification categories removed,and have the Australian Parliament amend the new category of R18+ in the Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. i liked the movie because the woman was the hero....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC