Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Rush Limbaugh still on American Forces Radio?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:03 PM
Original message
Why is Rush Limbaugh still on American Forces Radio?
The following excerpt is from a transcript of Rush Limbaugh's daily radio rant:



"Obama's Incoherent Afghanistan War Policy Doesn't Plan for Victory"

(snip)

"(Obama) didn't talk about victory because, remember, he's uncomfortable with the concept of victory. He has said this. And in Obama's world -- and I know some of you are not going to like this -- but if you haven't learned yet not to doubt me, learn now. Do not doubt me. Barack Obama believes Al-Qaeda has a point. Barack Obama believes our enemies have a point. He even admitted again last night our mistakes, national mistakes, targeting the Bush administration, apparently lying about Rumsfeld denying troop requests from 2001 to 2006. Rumsfeld has issued a statement. "What do you mean, Rush, Al-Qaeda has a point." In Obama's world, America is guilty, or was, until he was elected. America is unjust. America is immoral. America has plundered the world and stolen resources for our own selfish capitalistic use. Don't forget in one of Obama's books, just as an aside here, when he's talking about the first job he had in the private sector, he felt like he was behind enemy lines. "

(snip)

"So Obama's sending in these 30,000 troops not to win anything, but to lay the foundation for pulling them all out. And the other troops that are there, not just these 30,000. This is the policy of a left-wing politician, not a serious commander-in-chief who leaves the strategies to the experts. I heard this this morning and some last night that he can't please anyone. We're not talking about pleasing anyone! It's a war, for crying out loud! There's a goal in war, it's to win it. We win, they lose. To hell with pleasing people! This is what I mean: "Al-Qaeda has a point." Like we have a policy that supports Israel and they don't like Israel, no wonder they're mad at us, they have a point. That's how he views the world."

(snip)

"Those who oppose victory are not morally equivalent to those of us who support it. This is the thing that frustrates me the most. There is no moral equivalence between victory and defeat. Just because somebody wants to lose does not mean they have an equal morality right to sit at the table and debate this. We're not about losing. If we're going to lose, don't send the troops. The people on the left are wrong about this and we are right, and we don't have to worry about how they feel. It's not a strategy for winning anything. Obama did not use the words "victory" or "win." And I hear, "Well what is victory, Rush, what is victory?" Come on, folks, have we descended to the point that we're going to argue with ourselves over what victory is? I'll tell you what it is. Victory is preventing our enemy, which killed nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11 from using Afghanistan again to hit us. And it was the Taliban that gave Al-Qaeda the safe haven that they needed."

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_120209/content/01125106.guest.html

Is this sort of speech good for troop morale, especially without equal time given to opposing viewpoints? What do you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn Good Question. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. To piss us off. Is it working?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. who is in charge of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. agreed!
you would think it would be unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I registered RushOffAFN.com some time ago.
I haven't had time to do anything with it, but I will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. HE IS A TOOL TO DUMB AMERICA DOWN
PRETTY EFFECTIVE HUH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. He shouldn't be, given his endless remarks about the CIC.
He is a disgrace to this country and all it stands for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because uniformed freepers howl like stuck pigs
if he's so much as moved around the clock, let alone pre-empted or considered for replacement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R!
I've been wondering the same thing myself!

Thanks for posting this!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. H2SO911
Haha. I'm sorry I can't stop laughing. Sulfuric 911. That is brilliant.

I will read your post after dying here! And yes, why the hell?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is an excellent question, what's Obama thinking? They should
air independent military voices not the RW talking heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. I sure as hell didn't want to hear more military "voices" when I was in the military.
What's wrong with music and sports talk anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. Fair enough, but surely not Limbaugh, and why hasn't Obama put an end to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I have no earthly idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Holey Toledo! Are you and I agreeing on something?!?!
pass the salts I've fainted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Miracles happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. The answer comes in two parts..
1) He is one of the most popular programs on American radio and a significant portion of the listening audience of AFN wants him there.

2) If you remove the right wing stuff now, in 2012 or 2016 or whenever a Republican comes into office he has the justification to throw off Olbermann (as an example)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Olbermann is on AFR, first I've heard of that. I have absolutely
no doubt that listening to people like Rush add to the escalation of their frustration, their aggressions, and ultimately their PTSD. He should not be a voice on AFR. If Olbermann is, perhaps he should not be either. They need, imo, straight news and entertainment, not political pundits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Olberman is on AFN TV...
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 06:33 AM by Cid_B
I am uncomfortable with that whole premise. Soldiers are voters and political junkies (like yours truly) just like civilians. The idea comes across like our fragile little minds shouldn't be exposed to the things that the "adults" have decided are too racy for us.

edit: forgot some letters

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #42
93. So you think it's okay that soldiers risk their lives, get shot at, have people try
to blow them up with IEDs...but it's dangerous for them to...listen to OPINIONS?

Guess what. You don't get to decide what our military listens to or watches. Neither do I. We're civilians.

If the troops decide, en masse, that they don't want pundits and blowhards on AFN, then the military will drop them. If some people want to listen to Limpballs, that's their choice, not ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazyjoe Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #36
54. is the president in charge of the content on AFR ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. He is CIC so yeah, I think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #60
94. I think he has much more important things to do than micromanage what
our troops listen to on the radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because he is popular with the troops.
He is popular with the troops just like he is popular with the general public. Does NOT mean he is correct, just popular. AFN generally puts on the most popular shows on it's networks. If that's what they want to hear I say let them. The troops are not children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. NO, they generally put on partisan ultra-right-wing hacks
using my tax dollars. even a, er, person such as yourself should see that this is wrong.

Face it, the country would be a lot better off if Limpballs had been Berg'd 15 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Is he really all that popular with the troops & the general public? Or, do his
transnational sponsors just carpet bomb every solitary market with his show just for the heck of it, regardless of ratings? Afterall, he is just PR for the largest industries and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
40. Apparently he has 20+ million listeners per day. Link below.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-listened-to_radio_programs

Since all the top 10 slots are conservatives with Bortz being at 4.5 million, the "strongest" left leaning talk show host has, at maximum, just under 25% of his listener ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #40
50. There is over 305 million people who live in the United States. So
20 million listeners, which I don't believe, is a small fraction of the population!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. It IS a small percentage...
But it's one of the largest audiences out there - if that's not big enough then no program would make the cut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
59. Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner.
Clear Channel has Limbaugh on in every market where they own radio stations, to the point where his show overlaps itself in adjacent markets where I live.

When you "carpet bomb" markets with this program, you'll get impressive-looking listenership numbers. At the same time, you reduce the chance of having any "progressive" programs occupy the airwaves.

Like another person noted, 20-million listeners is not that large of a percentage in a nation of over 300-million. I also question if these people are listening to Limbaugh because they agree with him, or because it's what's running in workplaces, or if you disagree with him, but just want to hear his outrageous comments of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. He's not popular with the soldiers I know.
And I only know a few people in my city who listens to the draft-dodging puss bucket.

After all the un-American crap he's said, I doubt if Limpballs can walk the streets safely anymore.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. But isn't our tax money
paying for the Military Radio Networks? If so they should not be pushing any one view. However, I'm not sure of my facts here. Perhaps the Military Radio is privately run and not a governmental operation. I just don't know. In any event, there are plenty of freepers and bonafide far-right-wing zealots in the Pentagon and Defense Department who want to keep the soliders in the field indoctrinated and propagandized. I'm sure Rush is like mother's milk to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is it just me or does Rush appear to be back on his, uh, meds?
The speech at CPAC and the recent interview with MSNBC (the one where he looks like Archie Bunker) both show a restless Rush with wild eyes who can barely sit in his seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Every time he loses weight
he loses it FAST. 50-60 pounds in a matter of months.

Yeah, he's fried on something again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Speed (diet pills) would explain some of that.
So would a lot of other things. He'd be better off having gastric bypass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. He'd be the size of a garden gnome
if they'd just let the hot air out of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Well, he's got the face for it.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because the Pentagon still has too many loyal to Gen. Edwin Walker?
You, know...John Bircher-types.



¡Hola, Compay! ¿Com'andan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted.
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 09:26 PM by phasma ex machina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. I don't know. Has anyone thought to write and ask them?
I would if I cared, but I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Wes Clark asked that he be dropped.
Take Rush Limbaugh Off Armed Forces Radio

Unlike you, anigbrowl, Wesley Clark doesn't want the troops under the sway of a NAZI propagandist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Yes, as a matter of fact. Been asking for years.
His program on AFR violates the Hatch Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. How so?
Not a fan of Limbaugh's in any way, shape or form, but having served for 20 years in the military and now as a federal employee, I'm well versed in the Hatch Act. How is this a violation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Too bad you do not care.
:(


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Oh, I like that one, Swamprat.
Very accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Thanks, and about what charlie said above:
I find his face more porcine than gnomish.

oink! :D



:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. OK, I'll have to concede to you on that one.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
81. Frankly, I think that troops in theater know a lot more about the reality of war than Rush does
and so I doubt he is taken all that seriously. But more significantly, it's not like Limbaugh and Hannity are the only political cotnent on AFN. They also feature Ed Schulz, carried Al Franken's show (until he quit to run for the senate), Alan Colmes, NPR news...in short, AFN is quite similar to what you'd have if you reinstated the fairness doctrine, in my opinion. If it wasn't Rush it'd be some other rightie who we'd no doubt find equally obnoxious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
34. Swampy, normally I applaud your work, but this time ...
... I just have to point out that you got the face on the wrong end! :D (The spewing green gunk stays, though)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. Because it's useful to make the troops mean and dumb
so that they won't question stupid missions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #35
90. Are you saying our troops are "mean and dumb"?
If not all of them, what percentage do you consider "mean and dumb"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #90
92. I didn't say they were--I said the idea was to MAKE them mean and dumb
Having seen the effect that right-wing talk radio has had on certain family members of mine, I know that it is capable of making people mean and dumb by encouraging hatred and getting them to mistrust other sources of information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
43. Damn good question. Let's do something about it. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
western mass Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
44. because corporate Democrats are not on our side
and they don't give a damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
46. He's on AFR because the democrats are in power now
Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia are still battling for control

Democracy.......what a concept
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
47. it's because
AFN is for the benefit of the troops not the American civilian market.

If the troops want Limbaugh on there, he is on there. if they don't, he won't.

there are plenty of other things wrong with the world, many far more serious than Limbaugh's show status and outlets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #47
52. Bullshit
He indoctrinates the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #47
53. Not hardly!
Limbaugh is only on AFN because the GOP during the Gingrich years put him there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #47
64. yup hes there because the troops want him to be on there, no matter what people on the outside say
hes popular with the guys listening to AFN, until the day comes when the troops no longer want him on the air he should be able to stay. Its their radio station and they should get to choose what they listen to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #64
79. Prove it.
Provide all the evidence you need to prove "the troops" + "want him to be on there" is true. Make sure you divulge the method and procedure by which you've defined "the troops" and "want him to be on there," and how and why these terms and concepts are combined to form your conclusion. I'm sure others are interested to know too.

I'm interested because some of the military personnel I know can't stand Limbaugh, and others mostly ignore him. I only know two, gung ho right wingers who love Limbaugh, but one doesn't count because he was kicked out of the military during boot camp (the other is insane).

My cousin (active duty, multiple tours) says they mostly like to listen to music and sports while in Iraq/Afghanistan, or while on base stateside.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #64
83. You're a fake Marine
STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
48. The lowest scum.
Pure Fascism burns in his black heart. A Joseph Goebbels wannabe.

And yet The Democratic Party is so timid that they allow this Tokyo Rose to spew to impressionable young troops on armed forces radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #48
62. Thank goodness we have you...
... to save our impressionable young minds from the evils of the world.

Christ.. how condescending can you get? We are grown adults and a significant portion of the listening audience likes it so he stays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #62
71. How many Limbaugh supporters do we have in this thread?
Seems we got some cleaning up to do here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #62
74. Fundamentalist Christians, especially
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 04:27 PM by Enthusiast
the young ones in the military, have never had an original thought. Yet you think it is fine for Limbaugh to tell them President Obama, their commander and Chief, is a traitorous communist stealth Muslim socialist racist out to destroy the nation. And this is good for moral?

Cid_B, who are you, and why are you on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
49. Remember the Dixie Chicks?
Under Cheney/Bush rule they were essentially banned for saying unkind things about the ruler, er President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
51. We need a replacement for L*mbaugh
Someone his current fans would like more.
The main portion of his appeal is validation of ignorance.
That really appeals to the ignorant, as we've all seen.
Perhaps if the rest of his fans could be peeled away,
the Ignorance lovers wouldn't be enough to keep him on.
It will have to be some kind of entertainment, perhaps
a radio version of "Hee Haw".
It's a shame this isn't TV. A look at the original
Hee Haw girls could make most men forget L*mbaugh in
seconds.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
55. Wrong question
He's there because the listeners of that station want him there.

The better question is why so many of them want to listen to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #55
80. No, right question, and your question should also be explored.
One does not preclude the other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #80
85. You're saying that Armed Forces Radio
shouldn't consider what the armed forces want to listen to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #85
89. That would be a silly thing to say, and I hope you are not suggesting it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
57. Especially when more progressive radio shows are specifically banned. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #57
66. Do you have a link for the assertion that "progressive shows
are specifically banned"? From my experience AFN plays what is popular period. Unfortunately, the top 10 radio talk shows by ratings are all conservative leaning. I know there was much discussion here about why this is when AirAmerica was spiraling down. Sad but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
58. Oh, and K&R! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
61. the military has been compromised by politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SallyMander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
63. I know a lot of good toads

who would be hurt by this comparison. :P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #63
76. Yeah, me too, but Bane Toad is a human/swine/toad hybrid made in a clandestine lab.
No offense to toads and pigs - they are innocent victims. ;)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
65. If someone kicked the shit out of Rush, all that would be
left is his hearing aids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
67. So the troops don't figure out who has *really* victimized them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbarber Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
68. If soldiers want to listen to Rush..
They have all the right in the world too. I don't think soldiers need us to hold their hands and tell them who they can or can't listen to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. It's sponsored by the government and I don't think they get a vote
Your suggestion that they "want" to listen to this crap is ridiculous. How do you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #70
91. How do you know they don't? That's equally ridiculous.
Edited on Mon Dec-07-09 01:20 AM by Common Sense Party
AFN plays LOTS of different shows. Limbaugh is a very small part of the total programming there. It's not like any troops are FORCED to listen to Limbaugh, or Hannity, or Ed Schulz, or even Ryan Seacrest.

AFN also offers a variety of radio programming over its various frequencies throughout the world. Not only is there local programming (with sailors and soldiers as disc jockeys), but there is satellite programming, as well. Music programming spans Classic Rock, Rhythmic R&B, Jack FM, Techno/Trance and country music. Ryan Seacrest's AT 40 and the American Country Countdown with Kix Brooks are broadcast weekly over AFN Radio. In addition to music, AFN broadcasts syndicated talk radio programs such as Car Talk, Kim Komando, The Rush Limbaugh Show, The Motley Fool Radio Show, A Prairie Home Companion, Dr. Laura, Sports Overnight America, and other programs from National Public Radio and other sources. Letters From War by Mark Schultz was the #1 song on AFN in 2004. Weekly religious ecumenical programming on Sunday's includes First Radio Parish Church of America with Rev. Peter Panagore.

On December 5, 2005, liberal/progressive Ed Schultz from Jones Radio Network and conservative talk show host Sean Hannity were added to the radio programs provided by the AFN Broadcast Center to its affiliate stations. The addition of Al Franken's show soon followed but was replaced by the Alan Colmes show when Franken started his Senatorial campaign.

On April 24, 2006, AFN Europe launched AFN The Eagle, a virtually 24-hour-a-day radio service format initially modeled after "Jack FM" but most recently a "Hot AC" format. This replaced ZFM, which had more of a CHR flavor. When the Eagle was launched AFN Europe took control of what local DJs could play.

Altogether, AFN produces 10 general-use streams for AFN stations to use. Of these, seven are music-based, two are sports-based, and one is a general news/talk channel, which also features live play-by-play of american sports. (it's also the one heard on shortwave, if the shortwave radio has Single sideband (also known as SSB) installed). How these stations use these formats is up to them. These formats are:

Hot AC (young adult alternative/80's and 90's)
Z Rock (new rock)
DriveFX (trance/techno)
Country (country/western)
Gravity (urban rhythmic)
Classic Rock
Jack FM (80, 90's)
Voice Channel (mainly NPR programming and sports programming from FOX, ESPN, and the Sporting News; this channel also broadcasts many talk shows, such as Rush Limbaugh and Ed Schultz.
ESPN Plus (sports programming from ESPN and Sporting News Radio)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Forces_Network
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
69. Good question - it's like having a mutineer recruiting for an overthrow
It's insane that they allow this hate-spewer attempt to destroy the moral of the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
72. Because he is the Voice of Big Business
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
73. Good question. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
75. K and R
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
77. Warning! Achtung! Peligro! ... Beware DUers!
Warning!: If Bane Toad starts to wobble his head in circles, faster and faster, and starts making a sound like, "... robble ... robble ... excellence in broadcasting ... robble, robble, robble ... E-I-B ... robble, robble, robble ... Clear Channel Radio ... robble, robble, robblerobble... robblerobblerobblerobblerobblerobble!!!", that means he's about to spit deadly venom. :hide:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
78. To European eyes, the right-wing in the US is an ongoing Monty Python show.
Lunacy is its stock-in-trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
82. As an Air Force brat, I remember growing up listening to the base's AF Radio
Back then they were playing the Dr. Demento show. How things have changed....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
84. I'm not buying this bullshit that "they want him on there"
I didn't give a flying fuck about talk radio till I was at least in my mid 30's. When I was a soldiers age the only thing the radio provided was music. I somehow doubt things have changed much and I doubt that after spending a day on patrol the troops want to listen to any whiner on the radio, right or left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #84
95. Me neither
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
86. That fat ass drug addict is about as useful for morale as
...Lord Haw Haw or Lord Hee Haw were back in WW II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
87. Duh-cuz the Pentagon, D of D is filled w/ right-wing imperialist war mongering thugs same as Pigman
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 09:21 PM by GreenTea
And they make all the decisions...

And they all believe in corporate fascism and world domination...while the pigman Limbaugh keeps his uninformed, uneducated listeners on the same page, jacked-up with misguided patriotism as the led astray become cheerleaders for the corporate and military elite supporting their war "games" their multi-billion dollar "toys" all to "liberate" the world resources & keep the world's slave/workers oppressed - Great fun & profit for a very few....like the pigman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
88. I wish I had an answer .
I am not in the military and don't have their voice. Perhaps it's the same mix in the military as it is in the states. Some soldies may for good reason Hate Rush and others may like Rush.

All I can say is at the very least the soldiers should be offered the view of the few who are on the liberal radio shows so they have a choice. At least then they can decide for themselves and maybe some will turn the pigman off, if enough did perhaps Rush would just go the hell away.

The problem with Rush the few times I have listened is he makes sense if you don't see the reality of the entire picture.

We have a corporate owned media and most of the money is fed to rush and the like.

I can only say I just wish people would be given the truth on all issues , why is this so difficult? I would guess that money over rides all else when it should not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
96. Right on! Too late to rec, but here's a kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC