Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nelson Ready To Bust Pharma Deal: 'They Need 60 Votes, Don't They?'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:34 PM
Original message
Nelson Ready To Bust Pharma Deal: 'They Need 60 Votes, Don't They?'
Nelson Ready To Bust Pharma Deal: 'They Need 60 Votes, Don't They?'

First Posted: 12- 6-09 01:42 PM | Updated: 12- 6-09 02:26 PM



Sen. Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat, said on Sunday that if leadership doesn't work with him on his amendment that would break the White House deal with Big Pharma, he won't be there to support the bill.

On Saturday, Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) said that his drug re-importation amendment was the only one so far guaranteed by leadership to get a floor vote.

HuffPost asked Nelson if he had gotten a similar guarantee. "I haven't gotten a guarantee, but they're going to have to," he said.

And why is that?

"They need 60 votes, don't they?" said a smiling Nelson. Democrats need 60 votes -- precisely the size of their caucus -- to break a filibuster and move to a final vote. The precarious nature of the super-majority gives individual senators veto power over the bill.

Nelson said that he could be willing to settle for less than a full floor vote if leadership included a version of his measure in the "manager's amendment" that will come toward the end of the floor process. "I'm a reasonable man," said Nelson.

The manager's amendment will largely replace the current bill and make changes desired by senators that might not be able to get 60 votes or don't warrant the floor time that would be needed.

more...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/06/nelson-ready-to-bust-phar_n_381812.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Quit fucking with us Blue Dogs. It's our lives you are playing
games with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. What exactly is the amendment?
Does it permit or forbid re-importation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's time to go nuclear with a 6 month sunset clause
meaning that if Blue Dogs and Republicans haven't learned to play nicely and work with others, then the majority can vote for another 6 months of filibuster suspension.

My guess is that the end of the filibuster won't survive more than a year, but a lot can be done in that year, a lot that needs to be done that shouldn't be held hostage to corporate whores and antiabortion crusaders.

The Senate needs potty training badly and this is the way to accomplish it. They're simply not doing the jobs they were elected to do without it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. "They need" - he uses 'they' when speaking of
what is supposed to be his own party. Very telling, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's actually a good amendment. But, it's also a possible attempt to scuttle the entire bill. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rule by the minority again.
They need to change the filibuster rule to 51 votes or majority rule. It's what's destroying the state of California, well what's left of the part Arnold couldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC