Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Administration: $200 Billion to be Slashed from Bailout Costs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:39 AM
Original message
Obama Administration: $200 Billion to be Slashed from Bailout Costs
Obama Administration: $200 Billion to be Slashed from Bailout Costs

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A Treasury official says the Obama administration plans to cut its estimate of the projected costs of the government bailout program by more than $200 billion.

The official said Sunday that the administration now believes the cost of the program would be at least $200 billion below the $341 billion estimate it made in August.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the administration's new projection has not been presented to Congress, said the reduced cost estimate reflected faster repayments by big banks and less spending on some of the programs.

http://www.news10.net/news/national/story.aspx?storyid=71454&catid=5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Costs??? I thought all these loans to banks were supposed to turn a profit?
Where are the people now who said taxpayers might even turn a profit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've got a program he can cut.
But then we'd lose the pipeline and heroin money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. So true.
Of course, the we in "we'd lose that money" isn't the same we as the we in "we, the people"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good news! It also shows that the budgeting was very conservative
When the TARP bill was passed, Barney Frank said it was designed to ensure that the taxpayer would be paid back, but there was a big risk that they wouldn't get paid back. So they budgeted it as all cost, ie expenditure. As more and more TARP recipients pay back the funds, the estimated cost of the program as expenditure falls.

Also, the bailout had many elements other than TARP that are direct expenditures, like AIG, Fannie/Freddie, FDIC bank closings and the like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. They're cutting the extimates of the bailouts, not the actual bailouts.
More lies for mass consumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Actually, they are cutting projected losses from the bailouts
The bailouts were apparently budgeted as presuming a complete, 100% loss by the government on all TARP money.

As money gets paid back and expected losses don't materialize, the cost of the bailout drops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC