Who do you trust more?

[RB TexLa]

[Shell Beau]

1. Neither comes to mind, but I guess I'll go with the English.

[RB TexLa]

2. I voted Saudi, I don't consider the other creatures to even be human beings.

[timeforpeace]

13. Ditto. Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government.

[KansDem]

3. So do I...they have yet to fly planes into our tallest buildings...

Until they do, I'll have to to with them, too.

[Bluebear]

4. Well, THAT'S random!

[DireStrike]

5. What, no Japanese Imperial family option?

[47of74]

9. In the absence of that option, I went with the British option.

[gleaner]

6. English hands down ...

they are not profiteering in oil, lifetime friends to the Bush family, or actively meddling in our affairs at this point.

[TexasObserver]

7. House of Saud v. Prince Charles/Princess Diana. Close call.

Both pretty worthless. Sauds more dangerous, however, and certainly more greedy and power hungry.

[kenny blankenship]

8. Any citizen of a republic who "trusts" any royal family of any nation

should soak their heads overnight.

[LostInAnomie]

10. Both are total sacks of shit.

The English Royals don't hold any actual sway over our policies though.

[spanone]

11. the osmonds

[ashling]

12. Actually, my cat is royalty - or so she thinks

and I don't even trust her . . . she's lying on my folded clean shirt pretending to be asleep while she plots to take over the world.