+ 73% Back Pain

[Bucky]

[Roland99]

1. 193% of people polled had a response? Nice.

BTW, back "pain"?


Well, The Twit *is* a pain in my ass....close.

[pipoman]

5. I missed that 193%

:spray: Reminds me of a story I read once comparing voter turn out in the US to Cuba. It said that while the US voter turnout is usually teens or twenties percent, Cuba has 100% and sometimes more..

[Dennis Donovan]

2. I'd back "Pain" over Palin any day!

:rofl:

[pipoman]

3. These mid term polls and

prognosticating make me laugh. The chances of Huckster or Romney being more than a blip in the 2012 election is nil. The 2012 will have a new cast of characters IMHO...Palin may well be one of them. The huckster lost in 08 because he is too fundie for the masses of even the repubs, and romney lost because he is viewed too liberal..both are the basis of the candidates, so while they will undoubtedly run and tweak their messages, these key problems are not going away. Just my .02.

[Le Taz Hot]

4. 1) It's Faux nooz.

2) Polls 2 years out are meaningless.

[mdmc]

6. --

[Union Yes]

7. Becks chalkboard screwed Humes touchscreen and this is the bastard child.

[Shagbark Hickory]

8. The real question should be how many in IOWA & NEW HAMPSHIRE back whom.

It also doesn't take into account all those newcomers that haven't come to the surface yet.
The Barack Obamas, The Sarah Palins, if you will.