Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Air Force confirms 'Beast of Kandahar' drone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 01:12 PM
Original message
US Air Force confirms 'Beast of Kandahar' drone

US Air Force confirms 'Beast of Kandahar' drone

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The US Air Force on Tuesday confirmed for the first time that it is flying a stealth unmanned aircraft known as the "Beast of Kandahar," a drone spotted in photos and shrouded in secrecy.

The RQ-170 Sentinel is being developed by Lockheed Martin and is designed "to provide reconnaissance and surveillance support to forward deployed combat forces," the air force said in a brief statement.

The "RQ" prefix for the aircraft indicates an unarmed drone, unlike the "MQ" designation used for Predator and Reaper aircraft equipped with missiles and precision-guided bombs.

Aviation experts dubbed the drone the "Beast of Kandahar" after photographs emerged earlier this year showing the mysterious aircraft in southern Afghanistan in 2007.

The image suggested a drone with a radar-evading stealth-like design, resembling a smaller version of a B-2 bomber.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091208/pl_afp/usaviationmilitarydrones
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Taliban has radar?
Who knew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They're probably running it there for shakedown purposes.
"Real world" testing, even if not against a hostile radar system, can be vital to seeing whether an engineering project is going to be capable of performing in actual service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. My guess is it is flying over Pakistan once they confirm it works nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Iraq/Aghanistan is likely the new Area 51 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Heh. Makes sense, actually.
I'll be damned if I'm heading over there with a lawn chair for any planespotting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. yup nothing like using a combat zone to field test equipment
its there that the stuff thats gonna fail is gonna fail...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I bet a lot of guys wished they'd done that with the original M16 rifles. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. yup i was involved with the first combat trials of a new system and it stunk
nothing worse than having mags drop out when you run, or continual stoppages, or worse whole sight units just dropping off..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. How come we never have time to do it right the first time?
but we always have enough time to do it over when it fails?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. unfortunately what works well in design and in practice sometimes just dosent work on the field of
combat, what designer is ever going to think that the rifle hes designing will have to be able to survive a 40 foot drop and still function, when you are on the field shit comes up and happens that no one was expecting. Then they redisgn the system and next time out something else goes wrong....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I worked at a facility that developed tools for EOD.
They have to work the first time, all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. why a recon drone over Afghanistan?
from someone's blog:

Exactly what is the UAV's mission in Afghanistan? The Taliban and Al Qaida don't have radars or an integrated air defense system (IADS), so there's no real requirement for a stealthy drone in that campaign. On the other hand, a very low-observable, high endurance UAV would be ideally-suited for keeping tabs on nuclear facilities in neighboring Iran or Pakistan.

http://formerspook.blogspot.com/2009/05/beast-of-kandahar.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That is what it is all about. Monitoring Pakistan and possibly Iran.
I think that is why we are dumping troops there. It has nothing to do with Afghanistan. Afghanistan is just where our bases are.

The surge in troops and weaponry could trigger a series of events that lead us, quite naturally, into an escalated conflict in Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Why do I keep having the words
'Domino Theory' and 'Laos' come to mind?

Our prescence is meant to destabilize the region. I think the dems are walking into Gates's little miltary finger trap. Soon we will never be able to extricate ourselves, because we will have multple fronts, some of whom own some pretty big guns.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. +1 For the moment most stories in Roggio's Long War Journal concern Pak incidents.
Artist concept of The Beast:




Alleged photo of The Beast:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. picture
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 03:50 PM by thereismore

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Looks like a baby Hedorah.
Careful, they grow up to be the Smog Monster, and Godzilla is in retirement so we'd be fucked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Looks like a new model of hummer
A smog monster in it's own right ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. LOL
Good one! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC