Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The more McChrystal talks about the "new" Afghan strategy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 06:05 PM
Original message
The more McChrystal talks about the "new" Afghan strategy
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 06:08 PM by BanzaiBonnie
the worse it looks.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121246362

He's talking about five years out... Afghans still won't be ready to take care of their country.

AFAICS, there is no good reason to stay in Afghanistan. There is nothing to gain and we just keep spending our country into more debt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. He is a proven liar. Nothing he says should be taken at face value.
If that slug had any honor he would resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If he can hide abused prisoners from the ICRC, who knows what he's hiding from us. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can we be certain he is not Donald Rumsfeld
in disguise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No he is President Obama's choice for the assignment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. i do not like him, not one little bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a curious thing, innit?
During the summer, he said that he couldn't possibly finish the job with one man less than 40,000. This week, he says that 30,000 is plenty. Was he lying to us during the summer? Is he lying to us now? If 30,000 more troops is less than what he absolutely, rock-bottom has to have, shouldn't he resign or something? If he was telling the truth both times (officer and gentleman that he is), what specifically has changed in the last few months that the military can complete its mission with 10,000 fewer troops? And if we waited another three or six months, could we get by with 10,000 less than the current 30,000 allotment? I should think this would be of vital interest to the troops and their families. That is, if they're a priority at all anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. McChrystal is in the element he paid for: 'McChrystal's Explanation For Pat Tillman Cover-up
'Is "Preposterous"

Little attention has been paid to Gen. Stanley McChrystal's back-story and his rise to the height of military command of U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Before becoming the voice of gravity and a champion of higher troop levels in the eight-year long war, McChrystal's resume was sullied by a controversy in that same theater: the misclassified death of Pat Tillman.

McChrystal was the head of Special Operations command in Afghanistan during Army Ranger (and former football star) Pat Tillman's death. McChrystal was the one who approved paperwork awarding Tillman a Silver Star despite knowing (or at least suspecting) that he had died in fratricide and not, as originally determined, enemy fire.

This was once a big embarrassment for the army and, to a lesser extent, McChrystal himself (though he has copped to making an innocent mistake). But when the general was elevated to top spot in Afghanistan this past spring, relatively few publications revisited the affair.'


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/01/jon-krakauer-mcchrystals_n_341545.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why waste your ears on that liar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC