debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 06:26 PM
Original message |
Maxine Waters: She will vote against the current Senate 'compromise' |
|
Just on Ed...
Progressive Caucus has not yet come out.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I really hope the whole caucus votes HELL NO! And next year... |
|
...the write a single payer bill.
|
FarCenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. If HCR dies this year, it is dead for the Obama adminstration |
|
Probably dead for a decade. It was from '93 until '09 last time.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Not if the people raise enough hell - what's happening in this country is shameful! nt |
Goldstein1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
34. "Raising Hell" That's good |
|
We need more talk about raising hell, with a lot of actual raising hell to follow.
This is actually beginning to read a little bit like the Democratic "Underground" instead of the Democratic Mainstream.
|
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. And the Dems did the same thing in '93, ignored not for profit advocates... |
|
to try and keep the for profit insurance companies in business.
What service do they provide in the care of the sick - None!
They do serve as a vehicle for investors to earn a return on their money.
The Democrats need to work for the people, not the corporations.
Whoever heard of the PO back in 2007, not very many. Yet they were able to turn the support from a national, not for profit system favored by over half the population into support for an idea without many details.
Some will blame this on the Republicans or the Blue Dogs, but I blame those who put the profits of corporations ahead of the needs of the people.
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
bvar22
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
There is no way to spin it.
The very act of taking Single Payer Off the Table exposed the LIE. This was NEVER about Health Care Reform.
From the start, it was ALL about Enhancing the Profits of the Health Insurance Cartel, Wall Street's incestuous 1st Cousin.
|
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
32. Exactly, no sense trying to hide the facts. n/t |
Goldstein1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
35. Single payer is the only real reform... |
|
The public option, as crafted, will just force the poor to buy insurance they would already have if they could afford it.
Let it go. There will be another chance in 2010 if the people of this nation RAISE ENOUGH HELL.
The government has never given anything good to the people of this nation without them demanding it.
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
16. If HCR dies this year, it's dead for a generation |
|
And in twenty years, it'll take twice as much yelling and screaming to get a bill with half as much as the Senate bill that will be killed this year.
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
29. I don't agree. The health insurance companies need this bailout |
|
They can't sustain and need this legislation.
Health care reform will be back with a vengence - give it a election cycle.
|
FiveGoodMen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. God, that would be wonderful! |
RoyGBiv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
If it dies entirely, there will be no new bill, not in the next decade at least.
|
ellie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
12. There will be no new bill |
glen123098
(419 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Does the current bill force you to buy health insurance? |
|
What if you don't have enough money to buy health insurance? What happens then, Do you have to pay a fine. How does that help people out?
|
Dinger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I hear nothing of this in the media either. Thanks for mentioning it.
|
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. Amazing, that part is always left out. I do not hear it in the speeches ... |
|
in Congress. Here is the AHIP commercial they ran in favor of HC reform. AHIP commercial for health care reform - "If everyone is covered..." equals mandate. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6494081&mesg_id=6494618http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R36YJl8SagU
|
tomm2thumbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
25. they should simply mandate that poor people have to be rich - OR ELSE!! |
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. They could raise the minimum wage in the same bill as they mandate... |
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. Yes, but that aspect is not mentioned. The insurance companies knew... |
|
they had to make concessions, so they agreed to cover everyone if there was a mandate to buy their product.
Not to mention they were losing customers, between the high premiums and loss of employment.
Then they knew the baby boomers would be enrolling in Medicare and they stand to lose a lot of paying customers.
|
SaveOurDemocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
19. Does the current bill undo the monopoly? |
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
36. Not even a little bit. n/t |
loyalkydem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
calico1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Yes..a brave woman who does not |
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I hope others follow her lead. :thumbsup:
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I could go for a private plan IF AND ONLY IF the ins. companies were as regulated |
|
as they are in Germany:
1. Non-profit with controls on what they can spend money for
2. Required to take everyone for the same price
3. No exclusions
4. Pay within a certain number of days without question
Why, they take all the fun out of being an insurance company! :sarcasm:
|
NoUsername
(265 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
That's exactly what a private health care insurance provider should be required to do.
Oh, and I would add that the coverage should be national. For example, if someone from CA drives to GA and happens to fall ill while there, they should be covered the same as they would be in CA. It's insane that you can travel between totally different countries in Europe and not have to worry about health care but in the US, you're taking a chance by crossing a state border.
No Lydia, your idea wouldn't take the fun out of being an insurance company. It would just minimize the profit. How goddamn un-American of you to even suggest something like that. ;)
|
G_j
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message |
17. thank you, Maxine.... |
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Kucinich may be able to support it |
951-Riverside
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
tomm2thumbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-10-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
24. the blue dogs all think they are having sex, but they are really masturbating each other's egos |
|
and the country is left with the mess
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 12:33 AM
Response to Original message |
31. Maxine has always voted with her heart. |
|
I love her when I lived in LA and she was on the south side. I wasn't. Whitey that I am I lived on the west side, but I always loved what she said and I'm with her now.
|
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 03:30 AM
Response to Original message |
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 07:34 AM
Response to Original message |
37. She said she MAY, she hasn't seen enough info so she can't say for certain. |
|
Lets NOT MISSTATE FACTS HERE, PLEASE.
|
Smashcut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-11-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This bill in its current form is a sham.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message |