Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans take credit for president's Afghanistan strategy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 02:54 PM
Original message
Republicans take credit for president's Afghanistan strategy
GOP Claims Foothold in Afghanistan Debate

{snip}

As the Obama administration closes its first year, Republicans have staked out a combative position on the issue that gives the president the most trouble with his restive liberal base. Beginning in March, Republicans and foreign policy hawks whose influence had waned at the end of George W. Bush’s presidency began to argue that the opposition party’s role in Afghanistan policy would be to argue for a sustained commitment. In the summer and fall, as Republicans saw more political openings against the president, they balanced criticism of his approach with avowed support for a troop increase. As Gen. McChrystal departs Washington, Republicans and conservative military analysts are confident that they’ve played a role in the president’s decision and set themselves up for the debate to come.

“Things are going pretty well right now because the Obama administration realized that the American people want McCrystal to make these decisions,” Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) told TWI. Referring to the role Republicans have played in challenging the Obama administration not to back down from a troop surge, Inhofe added that “a lot of that’s our doing.”

Quietly, other Republicans share Inhofe’s opinion. “I think the criticism had the effect of keeping pressure on, and keeping people focused on Afghanistan,” said one GOP aide in the Senate. “Now we’re focused on the success of the strategy. Politically, as far as we’re concerned, the past is the past.”

According to a Quinnipiac University poll released on Tuesday, Republican voters are, as they have been, the strongest supporters of the war in Afghanistan. Seventy-one percent of them say that fighting the war is the “right thing.” However, only 36 percent say they support President Obama’s handling of the war. That’s more support than the president gets from Republicans on other issues–only 21 percent support his foreign policy in general.


http://washingtonindependent.com/70364/gop-claim-foothold-in-afghanistan-debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. fuggem...let them take credit for death and mayhem...they deserve it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sad but true. The Republicans have convinced the Democrats
on the Hill that we are a Center Right Nation.

Further proof. HCIR is a more right ideological reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Repubs would take credit for pushing the rock out of the way...
...that allowed Jesus to leave his tomb and ascend to Heaven.

They would if they thought they could get away with it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's where he'll find his legislative margin in Congress
. . . when he comes to the Hill looking for money to pay for his misadventure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. As well they should. The reason for the escalation is to avoid criticism from the right & middle.
"Cut and Run" is a powerful weapon to use against a Democratic president. So, instead of risking bad PR Obama has chosen to risk lives. Though nicely larded with a pretty speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gates, Petraeus and McCristal are all Republicans.
The plan for Afghanistan is very similar to the surge in Iraq. What people forget is that the surge occurred because Bush and his staff screwed everything up and had to be rescued. If things look better in the summer of 2011, I could care less about who takes credit. The important thing is to give credit to the people who actually did the job. Lets hope that it is Obama and the people who sat in the room when the big decision was made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I remember
Is there a central leader like Sadr who's willing to call a 'ceasefire' in Afghanistan? Doesn't look like it. That strategic development by the Iraqi insurgency was the catalyst for reducing the violent attacks on American troops there . . . that and the rollback of the offensive strikes and raids and the troops' retreat to the Green Zone. None of that in Afghanistan. It's all 'bring 'em on' right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, Inhofe and the others elected Obama
So I guess Obama should do whatever they say he should do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC