Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will the Real Jobless Number Please Stand Up?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:39 PM
Original message
Will the Real Jobless Number Please Stand Up?
from HuffPost:



Dan Dorfman
Financial Columnist, Market Commentator.

Posted: December 11, 2009
Will the Real Jobless Number Please Stand Up?



The brothers Grimm began spinning fairy tales in 2007. Now 102 years later, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the government agency that doles out those closely watched monthly employment figures, seems to be giving the Grimms a run for their money.

In brief, the BLS is stacking the employment deck, a number of market professionals say. Or more specifically, they argue it is increasingly issuing misleading figures that paint a rosier picture of the country's biggest economic dilemma--mounting job losses.

In effect, the critics suggest that President Obama should factor in a lot more workers in his job-creating efforts because his labor analytical arm is woefully underestimating the number of unemployed workers.

The latest such BLS numbers-fudging is said to involve November's shockingly low jobs loss of 11,000, when the general expectation called for a much higher jobs reduction for the month of 125,000. That drop of 11,000 jobs, which was the best monthly performance since September 2008, knocked down the nation's unemployment rate to 10% from October's 10.2%. What had been widely expected for November was another 10.2% showing.

Other reported labor figures for the month, however, take issue with the accuracy of the BLS data, which, it should be noted, is very often later revised for the worse.

For example, Automatic Data Processing, the country's largest payroll service, which surveys 24 million employees a month, reported 169,000 jobs were actually lost in November. That's 158,000 higher than the BLS numbers. ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-dorfman/will-the-real-jobless-num_b_387074.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are estimating small business job creation
When there is in fact none going on due to the tight credit market. The administration knows these numbers are lies.

They need a win right now to prevent a total collapse and rebellion in the House and Senate. The progressives are getting angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC