Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Biased News Have a 'Time Bomb' Effect?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:54 AM
Original message
Does Biased News Have a 'Time Bomb' Effect?
http://www.miller-mccune.com/politics/does-biased-news-have-a-time-bomb-effect-1596


Even the most hardened Europeans
may succumb to media manipulation
and change their political views if they
are bombarded long enough with biased news.


Does Biased News Have a 'Time Bomb' Effect?

A European study shows that, over time, even the most sophisticated readers can be manipulated.

By: Melinda Burns | November 09, 2009 | 05:00 AM (PST)

There's nobody more cynical about the media than your average European.

Only 12 percent of Europeans claim to trust the media, compared to 15 percent of North Americans, 29 percent of Pacific Asians and 48 percent of Africans, the BBC has found. Yet new research out of the London School of Economics and Political Science suggests that even the most hardened Europeans may succumb to media manipulation and change their political views if they are bombarded long enough with biased news.

Michael Bruter, a senior lecturer in European politics at the school, fed a steady diet of slanted newsletters about Europe and the European Union — either all good news or all bad — to 1,200 citizens of six countries over two years. Over time, Bruter found, and without exception, the readers subconsciously adopted the bias to varying degrees and changed their view of the EU and of themselves as Europeans, a few of them in the extreme. Surprisingly, they didn't register any change right after the newsletters stopped — not until full six months later, when they had obviously let down their guard. Bruter calls this the "time bomb" effect of one-sided news. His study paints a blunt picture of how cynicism, far from inoculating citizens to resist political persuasion, merely delays the impact.

snip

Bruter did not study American media, but his research raises questions about the effects of long-term exposure to polarized television news on outlets such as the FOX and MSNBC networks — which are currently first and second respectively in cable news ratings. The Obama administration recently called FOX News Channel a political opponent and not a legitimate news organization.

snip

Thus, British citizens, the most cynical of all, may be alert to the anti-EU slant of their media, yet the study suggests they can be nonetheless be manipulated to feel significantly less European than others, Bruter said.

The media, he said — and particularly, the tabloids — should stop brushing aside accusations of bias with assertions that "their audiences are mature and sophisticated and can take what they say with a pinch of salt." "By contrast, my findings suggest that even sophisticated audiences are indeed susceptible to manipulation," he said. "As such, the big lesson for the media is that it does have a responsibility." Bruter became intrigued with the question of media and identity after the citizens of France and the Netherlands voted down a proposed constitution for the European Union in 2005. This setback, he said, made it imperative to figure out whether the media was influencing "why some citizens feel more European than others."

Bruter designed a two-year experiment in which he sent biweekly newsletters containing biased news about Europe and the EU to up to 200 each in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Belgium, Portugal and Sweden. These countries represented both large and small, rich and poor, pro-European and "Euroskeptic" members of the EU. Each four-page newsletter, compiled from daily and weekly European papers, included two pages of articles exclusively about Europe and the EU, either all positive or all negative. Thus, for example, one group of participants would read about how European heads of state agreeing to jointly fight drug trafficking, Airbus overtaking Boeing as the world's No. 1 airplane manufacturer, and the value of the euro going up, while another group would read about the value of the euro going down, Airbus losing a large order in China to Boeing, and heads of state failing to agree on how to fight organized crime from the former Eastern bloc.

snip

"Time Bomb? The Dynamic Effect of News and Symbols on the Political Identity of European Citizens," appeared earlier this year in the journal Comparative Political Studies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. VERY interesting. Thanks for posting! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another excellent article from Miller-McCune!
Thanks for bringing this to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I love that place.. and "Good" also
well researched & timely issues:)

happy to share:)

It;s nice to get away from what passes for MSM:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'll quibble about the pairing of FOX and MSNBC as impicitly equal opposite numbers...
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 12:48 PM by JHB
...but otherwise it is in keeping with the progression of the "liberal media" meme here: you have more people complaining about "liberal media" now, when the MSM routinely accepts conservative framing of issues, than you did back in the 60's and 70's, when you have a much stronger case for arguing that there was a liberal bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That kind of proves HOW biased media really is
that anything that comes along that even appears to be the anti-FOX, is also called biased..when in actuality, MSNBC probably has MORE "Factual" stuff than any media except for PBS..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. yeah
Fox viewers can be spotted after about 10 words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. But over here we've always had a free press
We have freedom of speech, and the the press is free to anyone-anyone at all-who can afford a multi-billion dollar print and broadcast media conglomerate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes! Propaganda is a dangerous weapon,
to which the only defense is not to see it in the first place.

This is why I believe we need to revisit, and modernize, the 18th century concepts of freedom of the press -- not to suppress speech, certainly not to suppress ideas, but to suppress propaganda. Propaganda is not communication, it is coercion. Those who think that they are too smart and too cynical to succumb to propaganda don't understand this. They imagine propaganda to be about ideas, and not about grabbing humans by the limbic system and compelling thought and behavior to which they would never consent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bruter: duh. commercials work. why wouldn't "editorial" content - even more so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC