Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Summers: Obama Will Persuade Bankers Because 'We Were There For Them'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:14 PM
Original message
Summers: Obama Will Persuade Bankers Because 'We Were There For Them'

Are you fucking kidding me?
The time to negotiate with Wall St. was BEFORE you hand them our money, not after.

The wealthy elite are laughing their collective asses off.




Summers defended Obama's attempts to persuade banks to increase lending. "The country did incredible things for the banking industry. Those things had to be done to save the economy, but no major bank would be intact, in a position to pay bonuses, if that extraordinary support had not been provided. The bankers need to recognize that. They need to recognize that they've got obligations to the country after all that's been done for them, and there is a lot more they can do, and President Obama is going to be talking with them about what they can do to support enhanced lending to customers across the country. We were there for them. And the banks need to do everything they can to be sure they're there for customers across this country."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/13/summers-employment-number_n_390224.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boy they sure were!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They used us ($$) in order to be there for their cronies
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 12:25 PM by SHRED
Now we are in a beggar's position.

Now we can "hope" for some spare "change".


---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not going to hold my breath
We all know who the "masters" are in this relationship. I would not be surprised at all if in the next election year the banks donate heavily to the Repubs as they know they have already gotten as much as they can from the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It appears that Summers and Obama...


...have reduced this down to pleading on an emotional level with Wall St.

This is the leverage they use?

Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Incredible! As if sociopaths have any sense of reciprocity nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. As if they have a conscience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Please Mr. Robber, let me keep my wedding ring
I gave you all the money in my wallet already.

Yeah, that will work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bwahhh! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. And, he still is. Unfortunately for us who have to cough up the subsidies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. This reminds me of the campaign publicly promising to renegotiate NAFTA while privately
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 02:04 PM by QC
rushing to Canada to reassure their government that it was all just campaign talk they could safely ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Obama’s 2006 Hamilton Project Speech
Shows ties to Goldman Sachs and and anti-New Deal/entitlement cuts

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/17984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. PufPuf 23 you should make this an OP
this nails it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yes, that really should be an OP. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Go for it!
I have never made an OP and have been keeping my "powder" dry because I truly want to remain hopeful and not be flamebait at DU.

Obama clearly stated he was/is a free trader globalist as opposed to fair trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fucking idiot
Fire him now, hire a progressive and wage war on the assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I think Summers and Geithner unfortunately
are exactly what Obama wants out of an economic team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Than he gets the economy and the record to run on with them nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Summers has always been a giant clod.
He has less credibility than Courtney Love at a drug bust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. The bankers already deny that they were even in need of help.
"Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) CEO Lloyd Blankfein said in an online Vanity Fair article recently that the company didn’t need a government bailout, and would have survived without it. President of Goldman Sachs, Gary Cohn, said it stronger, stating the company had cash and “would not have failed.”

Goldman spokesman Lucas van Praag confirmed that Goldman indeed did have a lot of cash on hand they had raised, which would have allowed them to weather a long-term financial storm. “We had cash and funding that would have allowed us to survive for quite a long time,” he said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. Summers must think we're a bunch of idiots.
Anyone who believes that bit shouldn't be in charge of feeding brine shrimp much less the economy of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC