Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The best punishment for Lieberman: call his bluff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:02 PM
Original message
The best punishment for Lieberman: call his bluff
LET him leave the Democratic caucus and give up his Homeland Security chairmanship. Leaving is the only leverage he has.

Since he is hardly giving the Democrats the filibuster-proof majority on the most important issues, his presence is worthless.

His chances of being re-elected as a Republican are probably nil (unless the Democrats STILL help him after he gives up even the pretense of being one of them).

Best of all would be the poetic justice, having him would serve on the GOP. Glory dog Joe would not be able to resist the temptation to suddenly become more progressive and continually petulantly threaten to leave the GOP if they don't do what he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. The leverage he has is voting "no"
Unless you can poach Snowe, you can't get 60 votes; unless you get 60 votes, you can't achieve Insurance reform (Reconciliation only lets you address the funding items in the budget). You can expand coverage, but everyone with private insurance will still be screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. we don't need 60. We need a majority leader who will force real filibusters and let the
GOP lose the remaining political capital they have.

One thing Bill Clinton did that I admired was calling Newt's bluff about shutting down the government over a budget deal. He let Newt do it, and all the blame fell on Newt and the GOP in the public's eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The 60 votes limit
IS what real filibusters are nowadays. The days of Mr. Smith goes to Washington are gone. From what I know, the only additional thing that Reid can do is keep them in the Senate non-stop and force them to sleep in their offices (for short periods of time, he can force them to come to te floor just to answer present at any time). There was such a "fun" night that I remember from a couple of years ago when they were fighting to get an Iraq resolution passed against the R filibuster. Fun to watch the Senate throughout the night (no work th enext day :-)) and to see bleary eyed Senators called to the floor every couple of hours, but do you venture to guess what the final outcome of this exercise was?

It's way too easy to just say "it's Reid's fault, why can't Bernie Sanders be majority leader?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. LMAO.. they'll probably give him an award for this..
The man campaigned for the other side, he stands against the dems every chance he gets. He supported Sarah Palin for god's sake and they gave him a fucking chairmanship. They'll probably give him the Congressional Medal of Honor for this one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Even the CMH wouldn't surprise me any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. This has to be about cashing in after he leaves office. I don't see how anything we do to him
while in office will make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I just wish we could steal the picture of him fucking a goat the GOP uses to blackmail him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. We can at least dump him on the back bench.
Let him defect to the GOP. At least he'll only be an asshole to our faces instead of stabbing us in the backs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. But the problem seems to be nobody with balls or power WANTS to punish him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. exactly. Like the GOP, he is the EXCUSE for half-assed action, not the reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree. Let him filibuster for the rest of the year.
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 04:28 PM by BrklynLiberal
What we would get as a result of "negotiating" with LIEberman for his vote, would not be worth anything anyway.

As was pointed out by Digby in another post, the result would be a bill that no repuke would vote for, that would do Americans no good, and that the repukes would be campaigning against next year and in 2012.

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/anything-by-digby-last-friday-i-wrote.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. LIEberman is laughing at us
He is loving this. I hope he gets what's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueMTexpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. May Lieberman get what he so richly deserves!
That will likely be a fitting punishment for this POS.
And may any Dem Senator who did not support to Ned Lamont against "Joementum" also get what s/he so richly deserves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Hell, yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Remove him from his position on the Senate Arms Committee ...that should shut him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC