Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Disgraceful: Discredited E-Voting Vendor VP Appointed to U.S. EAC Advisory Panel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 03:43 PM
Original message
Disgraceful: Discredited E-Voting Vendor VP Appointed to U.S. EAC Advisory Panel
Source: BRAD BLOG



Disgraceful: Discredited E-Voting Vendor VP Appointed to U.S. EAC Advisory Panel
Federal body tasked with overseeing U.S. certification of e-voting systems appoints scammer Edwin Smith, VP of e-voting companies Sequoia, Dominion, Hart-Intercivic...

Incredible. This would be the equivalent of appointing the sitting Vice President of Exxon Mobil to an EPA advisory committee, but Ed Smith has now been appointed to the disastrous U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC)'s Technical Guidelines Development Committee as one of their new "Technical and Scientific Experts".

So Smith went from voting machine company Hart Intercivic to voting machine company Sequoia Voting Systems and is now at voting machine company Dominion Voting Systems, where he is a VP, selling e-voting systems to jurisdictions around the country who receive federal money dolled out by the EAC. And now he'll also sit on an advisory board at the EAC helping to advise which one of those companies sees their systems certified for use in U.S. elections by the EAC. Just amazing.

But that's not even half the story of why this is just incredible, and another huge black eye for the EAC (how many eyes do they have left to blacken at this point?) If you're not a long time reader of The BRAD BLOG reader, and don't recall who this Ed Smith is, read on. It's simply stultifying...

FULL STORY: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7575


Read more: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7575
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess that's one way to keep them from stealing elections from us.
Get them on our side, so WE can steal the elections?

At least until we "even the score" by stealing back the 8 years they stole from us.

Then we pull back the curtain and end the charade once and for all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Think again...
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 04:16 PM by BradBlog
I realize you were being sarcastic in your response, but if you think the EAC is "on our side" you haven't been paying very close attention.

For the record, the current EAC has 3 commissioners. Two Rs (one of them the chair) and one D. There is a vacant D spot that has yet to be filled by Obama.

Even when its 2 to 2, the EAC is a miserable failure, having approved every shitty e-voting system currently in use in the country. There is no private, secret vote counting system they don't like. No failed system they will bother to decertify even after it's failed time and time again. No e-voting company that they'll bother to oversee -- rather, they'll just have a seat at the table, just like Ed Smith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Short version: We're Screwn. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. On that, no quibble. :-( (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Instead of their stealing the elections, we just GIVE the elections to them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. who appointed him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC