Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need help with terrorist attacks during Bush years after 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Roosesvelte Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:09 PM
Original message
Need help with terrorist attacks during Bush years after 9/11
Ever since Fort Hood, I've been tired of hearing the meme from some people that Bush kept us safe. I have found that reminding certain people of attacks that occurred post 9/11 does a lot of good at quelling it, at least when I'm in the room. What's more, it gets picked up even when I'm not. I want to see if my list is complete.

Anthrax attacks
Seattle Jewish Center attack
Knoxville attack
Beltway sniper
Shoe-bomber

The most effective one to compare to Ft Hood has been the Seattle Jewish Center attack, followed by Malvo.

Anthrax often gets blown off as "being part of 9/11," despite the actual facts. Sometimes the shoe-bomber is excused as an attack because it was unsuccessful (due to luck as much as anything else, but no matter).

The Knoxville attack is not seen by many as a "terror" attack, because the perpetrator was not a Muslim.


Any other overlooked incidents to add to the list would be appreciated. I have found retaliating with a laundry list whenever this comes up to be incredibly effective, and put Foot Hood in perspective for those with short memories. Of course, nothing convinces the crazies, but fortunately, most people aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't bother arguing. The fuckwads still try to blame Clinton for 9/11.
History isn't real big on their list of things to remember.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually, it was President Carter who set 9/11 in Motion...
:rofl:

:sarcasm:!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. FDR was initially responsible for 9/11
when he failed to stop the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roosesvelte Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not speaking to the fuckwads
I'm speaking to those in the middle who don't follow politics so well. To those people, this particular argument unopposed gives them pause. I intend to continue to oppose it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Until they start to pay attention to what is going on today, they'll be ignorant of the past.
That's the way it has always been.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wouldn't consider Seattle, Knoxville, or Beltway Sniper crimes to be terrorism.
There was no political motive involved. Two were mentally disturbed nuts of the typical variety. The Snipers were attempting extortion for monetary gain.

There were numerous bombings and arsons at abortion clinics during the Bush admin. All of those would qualify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roosesvelte Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Seattle is as much terrorism as Ft Hood
I don't disagree, but if Fort Hood can be said to be a "terrorist attack" because of the gunman, so can Seattle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly.
Neither are terrorism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lxlxlxl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. and what about spreading muslim terrorism in the rest of the world?
another thing that gets me is that the GOP could care less about the UK, Madrid, Bali, Bombay, Embassy bombings, bombings in pakistan...etc...etc...

if we don't think Bush's behavior made terrorism worse in the rest of the world we are kidding ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roosesvelte Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Were any of those embassies American?
Because to me, that counts as American soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC