Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Lieberman simply a willing fall-guy for the Insurance Lobby bill?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 09:49 PM
Original message
Is Lieberman simply a willing fall-guy for the Insurance Lobby bill?
Can one senator seriously wield that much influence?

Of course he stands to gain by presenting himself as a "Maverick" to the only idiotic supporters he has left: Pukes. At this point there probably aren't 3 Dems who would vote for him anyways.

The so-called Democratic senators get to point their fingers at a willing scape-goat and hopefully skate around the fact that they're really caving to the insurance companies on a massive scale, as they have been throughout this process.

So everyone gets to play the "Oh look we reformed healthcare", and everyone gets money from the insurance companies, and that sack of crap Lieberdouche firms up what is now his "base".

If you disagree then please frame your response with consideration of the fact that the Senate never had any true reform on the table for more than half a second, and they rolled over on this sad farce of "Medicare expansion as a gateway to a weak-sauce pubic option" in a couple of days.

In my opinion they carefully orchestrated an excuse for media consumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. There was another post earlier today that made some excellent points
about Liebermann being the guy the Democrats need. They have to have someone to do the dirty work for them. That's why they let him keep his committee chairmanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. here ya go princess I kicked the link for you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. My gut says "no"...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. So it's more believable that the rest of the Dems are spineless and inneffective?
Please ask your gut to explain :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You're boring me...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. If he still has his Chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee after the holiday recess
then we'll know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. It is undeniable
Lieberman is doing HUGE favors for some Democrats and the President by trying to take on the mantle of obstructionist. This is a play where the parts were written months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well if he is, doesn't that mean Obama is too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes I think so. Somehow legislation always favors the coporation...
It takes a lot of gaming to make that happen, and the guy at the top has to be involved. Instead of protesting this pitiful bill that lies about 1 million miles from his campaign "promises", he is lauding it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. He is just repping CT as best he can
and I don't disagree with your OP..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. CT's people or CT's Insurance companies?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. CT has big ins. co. all over it
lots o employees.. yadda yadda.. CT is pretty liberal yet pretty corporate. They could easily be served by a liberal republican Joe Leiberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. YES
totally IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Loserman is a willing scapegoat
IMO. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. Or course he is...
... he was Obama's mentor in the senate. This is all an orchestrated piece of theater to avoid doing anything real but CLAIMING they tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. they did try, imho
barely...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonn1997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think Reid *wanted* Leiberman to announce that the public option was defeated
Now *anything* with *any* public option in it sounds so much better to the liberal base. I think what happened was one of two possibilities:

(A) Reid and Leiberman are explicitly working together and planned everything including the latest stunt or
(B) They're not working together explicitly but Reid played Leiberman. That is, he knew that if he suggested the public option was done, Leiberman would run his big mouth about this achievement and the same desired effect (liberals accepting anything with a any public option) would happen.

Both A and B are counter to some stereotypes here of these Senators (counter to A: "Leiberman would never help any Democrat, especially the majority leader; counter to B: "Reid doesn't have the balls to pull that off") but I think we know nothing about these individuals. If anything, these stereotypes may actually be the useful roles that they have agreed to enact, or at least have individually chosen to take advantage of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. yes. It was planned all along it seems
Rahm Emanuel was on the phone with Reid telling him to give Lieberman what he wanted, after Rahm and the CEO of Pfizer made a deal.
Lieberman is their shill.
He will have a cushy job when he leaves office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah, he's a spoiler.
You know the one rotten apple that ruins the whole barrel metaphor. It's a political phenomenon known as minority rule, where a small faction is given unusual powers because the system allows them to gum up the works. It's how Hitler got into power. He was never the most popular candidate in the pre-Nazi Republic and was able to use a technicality to seize power and then change the laws to work for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. "So tell me again Hadassa, how much did we stash in Luxembourg?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC