Indenturedebtor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:49 PM
Original message |
Is Lieberman simply a willing fall-guy for the Insurance Lobby bill? |
|
Can one senator seriously wield that much influence?
Of course he stands to gain by presenting himself as a "Maverick" to the only idiotic supporters he has left: Pukes. At this point there probably aren't 3 Dems who would vote for him anyways.
The so-called Democratic senators get to point their fingers at a willing scape-goat and hopefully skate around the fact that they're really caving to the insurance companies on a massive scale, as they have been throughout this process.
So everyone gets to play the "Oh look we reformed healthcare", and everyone gets money from the insurance companies, and that sack of crap Lieberdouche firms up what is now his "base".
If you disagree then please frame your response with consideration of the fact that the Senate never had any true reform on the table for more than half a second, and they rolled over on this sad farce of "Medicare expansion as a gateway to a weak-sauce pubic option" in a couple of days.
In my opinion they carefully orchestrated an excuse for media consumption.
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. There was another post earlier today that made some excellent points |
|
about Liebermann being the guy the Democrats need. They have to have someone to do the dirty work for them. That's why they let him keep his committee chairmanship.
|
democracy1st
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. here ya go princess I kicked the link for you |
Kolesar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. My gut says "no"...eom |
Indenturedebtor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. So it's more believable that the rest of the Dems are spineless and inneffective? |
|
Please ask your gut to explain :D
|
Kolesar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. You're boring me...eom |
kenny blankenship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |
3. If he still has his Chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee after the holiday recess |
Vinnie From Indy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Lieberman is doing HUGE favors for some Democrats and the President by trying to take on the mantle of obstructionist. This is a play where the parts were written months ago.
|
timeforpeace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-15-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Well if he is, doesn't that mean Obama is too? |
Indenturedebtor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yes I think so. Somehow legislation always favors the coporation... |
|
It takes a lot of gaming to make that happen, and the guy at the top has to be involved. Instead of protesting this pitiful bill that lies about 1 million miles from his campaign "promises", he is lauding it.
|
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 06:53 AM
Response to Original message |
10. He is just repping CT as best he can |
|
and I don't disagree with your OP..
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. CT's people or CT's Insurance companies? |
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. CT has big ins. co. all over it |
|
lots o employees.. yadda yadda.. CT is pretty liberal yet pretty corporate. They could easily be served by a liberal republican Joe Leiberman.
|
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:03 AM
Response to Original message |
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Loserman is a willing scapegoat |
sendero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message |
|
... he was Obama's mentor in the senate. This is all an orchestrated piece of theater to avoid doing anything real but CLAIMING they tried.
|
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
Bonn1997
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I think Reid *wanted* Leiberman to announce that the public option was defeated |
|
Now *anything* with *any* public option in it sounds so much better to the liberal base. I think what happened was one of two possibilities:
(A) Reid and Leiberman are explicitly working together and planned everything including the latest stunt or (B) They're not working together explicitly but Reid played Leiberman. That is, he knew that if he suggested the public option was done, Leiberman would run his big mouth about this achievement and the same desired effect (liberals accepting anything with a any public option) would happen.
Both A and B are counter to some stereotypes here of these Senators (counter to A: "Leiberman would never help any Democrat, especially the majority leader; counter to B: "Reid doesn't have the balls to pull that off") but I think we know nothing about these individuals. If anything, these stereotypes may actually be the useful roles that they have agreed to enact, or at least have individually chosen to take advantage of.
|
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message |
18. yes. It was planned all along it seems |
|
Rahm Emanuel was on the phone with Reid telling him to give Lieberman what he wanted, after Rahm and the CEO of Pfizer made a deal. Lieberman is their shill. He will have a cushy job when he leaves office.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Yeah, he's a spoiler. |
|
You know the one rotten apple that ruins the whole barrel metaphor. It's a political phenomenon known as minority rule, where a small faction is given unusual powers because the system allows them to gum up the works. It's how Hitler got into power. He was never the most popular candidate in the pre-Nazi Republic and was able to use a technicality to seize power and then change the laws to work for him.
|
Raster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-17-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
20. "So tell me again Hadassa, how much did we stash in Luxembourg?" |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message |