Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who are the Dem. Senators that are not going to run in 2010?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 11:06 PM
Original message
Who are the Dem. Senators that are not going to run in 2010?
Hardball had a section on it but I did not get their names. I
wish if they were quitting anyhow that they would do what is
right. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bond Missouri
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bond's a Republican
The OP was asking about retiring Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does this help?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2010

Didn't look through it very closely but you may find some answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Roland Burris and Kaufman of Rhode Island
Don't feel bad. Nobody else had heard of Kaufman either. Not sure if they've heard of him IN Rhode Island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. They may not have heard of Haufman in RI
But that may be because he's from Delaware. :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, you're right.
That's how little the REST of us know about him.

Did he ever actually do anything that we need to know about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. By all accounts he's a nice guy.
He was appointed as a caretaker for Biden's seat a year or so ago and I think has been a reliable vote. He was Biden's chief of staff for almost 20 years, so if you were a fan of Biden's votes in the 80s and 90s... Kaufmann deserves some credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well, just so long as HE doesn't think he's from Rhode Island.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Chris was talking about House members
There were four of them who announced their retirements in conservative districts. Two were in Tennessee.

On a different topic, I'd list these Democratic seats as worth worrying about in the 2010 election.

1. Illinois (Burris) Dem should win
2. Colorado (Bennet) ???
3. Connecticutt (Dodd) Dodd should be okay
4. Nevada (Reid) thinking Harry's in big trouble
5. Delaware (Biden) Joe's son should win the seat
6. Arkansas (Lincoln) trouble? don't have a feel for it
7. Louisiana (Landreaux) I think she's okay
8. New York (Hillary's seat) Gillebrand should be okay in NY

I don't see any type of tsunami building. For sure some seats at risk though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't know about "tsunami"...
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 07:08 AM by FBaggins
...but it could easily be a pretty tough year if we don't turn things around.

1) IL - Can't say "Dem should win" when there is no indication that Burris will get out of the way. If it's Burris, we lose that seat absent a dramatic sea change.

2) CO - I would pick Bennet at this point, but there is plenty of reason for concern. A statewide incumbent regularly polling under 50% has reason to fear. It's also possible that we'll have an ugly primary. Have to rate this one as a tossup.

3) CT - Dodd is by no means "okay". The last poll that even showed him with a lead was in March (and he was still well below 50%). More recent polling puts him in the 30s and down by double-digits. He's in real danger.

4) NV - Yes... Reid is in trouble.

5) DE - I think that Biden can win the seat, but Castle holds the lead in most polls. Have to rate that one as a tossup.

6) AR - Trouble. She's well below the 50% danger line for an incumbent and has trailed in a number of polls.

7) LA - Yes... Landreaux is certainly safe here. If for not other reason than she isn't up for election for five more years. :)
The republican incumbent (Vitter), OTOH, has a potentially touch race. He leads in the high-single-digit range but is below 50% in the polls I've seen. It leans republican right now, but if national polls start to turn our way it could be a chance to pick up a seat.

8) NY had better be safe. Gillebrand IS sub-50%, but holds solid leads over competitors. If NY becomes competitive, people will be asking how close the republicans are to retaking the Senate and whether Lieberman will formalize his switch to the republican party.

You left off:

9) PA (Specter). By traditional measures, Specter is in real trouble. He's only trailed in one non-rasmussen poll, but is not just sub-50%... he has trouble holding 40%. Don't have a feel for this one but it's no solid hold.

10) CA (Boxer) - Can't see this as anything but a win, but it's one to watch.

So if the elections were held today we might lose 5-7 seats from that list. This should be offset but tossup (or better) races in NH, OH, KY and MO where Republicans could lose seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Burris announced in July he isn't running.
and Alaska's female Senator is a repuke. Other than that, I think you nail it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. My error was abreviation... not gender.
Should have been "AR" not "AK". Been doing that since probably second grade.

You're right about Burris. Thanks for the update.

I would then move that race from leans R to tossup. The stink from Blagojevich and Burris will make that a tough one.

If we can recover support nationally I think we'll be fine in IL. If not, this one likely gets swept up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. May also need to add ND to the list.
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 07:47 AM by FBaggins
Dorgan can't be considered endangered, but some say that Gov Hoeven may consider a run and republicans are certainly pushing him to do so. That would likely move a solid D race into the tossup column.

That's really "tossup" at best... since Zogby did a poll showing Dorgan losing by something like 20%. Let's just hope the governor likes his current job more.

On edit - Dorgan's team says that the poll was intentionally skewed and that their polling says that Dorgan would win that race. Let's hope we never need to find out... because I doubt anyone else can give him a run for his money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Thank you. That is what I was asking about. Was busy when it came
on and missed most of it. I also do not think it is a tsunami.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. Dems are not going to be loosing any seats in either the house or senate
so quite worrying about it. Americans can see what and who the problems are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Ah... Right. Those aren't the droids we're looking for.
Hope it works! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC