Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glenn Beck Defends Founding Fathers' Decision to Count African-Americans as Three-Fifths of a Person

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:53 AM
Original message
Glenn Beck Defends Founding Fathers' Decision to Count African-Americans as Three-Fifths of a Person
by Alex Seitz-Wald, Think Progress

"BECK: That is a common misconception. … Do you know who wanted slaves to be counted as a full person? … Slave owners. … The reason why they wanted that is because of the balance of power. The South could control the numbers in Congress. Their representation would go through the roof. … That’s why, in the Constitution, African-Americans were deemed three-fifths people, because the Founders wanted to end slavery and they knew if the South could count slaves as full individuals you would never get the control to be able to abolish it."

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/144599/glenn_beck_defends_founding_fathers%27_decision_to_count_african-americans_as_three-fifths_of_a_person/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. its correct that the South wanted slaves to be counted while the North
did not want them counted at all because of Congressional representation based on population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Would that have mattered?
Even if African-Americans were considered actual people, they in all likelihood wouldn't have been given citizenship; aren't only citizens counted in the census, and thus for representation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Except that all those votes would have NOT gone to the slaves.
Actually, beck is correct on this one...unfortunately...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. representation is apportioned by population, not citizenship I believe
thats why the South wanted slaves to be counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You're right; I should have done my homework.
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 10:51 AM by StarfarerBill
"The U.S. Constitution mandates us (the Census) to count everyone, including both citizens and non-citizens. We’ve followed this mandate, since the first census in 1790. The Framers of the Constitution made it clear they wanted “all inhabitants” of the country counted in the U.S. Census, and every Presidential Administration since that time that has overseen a Census has interpreted the Constitution and the laws require everyone be counted."

http://2010.census.gov/2010census/about/whole.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Some of the founders wanted to end slavery, but hardly all of them did.
Hardly even half of them did, which is how they wound up with that ridiculous three-fifth of a person rule. Northerners asked why, if southerners could count their slaves, they couldn't count their cows. If the anti-slavery forces had been strong enough, there would be no three-fifths person rule. Slaves would not have been counted. Period.

It was understood that southerners did not really consider their slaves full persons, but they did want to count them that way to enhance their own political power and make it that much more difficult for the Congress to end slavery. They had enough power to force the north to compromise and postpone abolition indefinitely.

In other words, Beck is a fucking idiot. Not even a three-fifth wit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Overt racism on FOX??? GASP! Who would EVER expect THAT?
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC