lame54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 03:15 PM
Original message |
|
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/12/16/white-house-irritated-with-howard-dean-not-joe-lieberman/White House “Irritated” With Howard Dean, Not Joe Lieberman By: Jane Hamsher Wednesday December 16, 2009 9:06 am - click link for video
|
| DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. "According to Lieberman, Obama thanked him privately yesterday." |
| uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. And we are supposed to believe Joe...why? |
| AndyA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Thanked him for WHAT? Running interference for him? |
|
Deflecting attention from the fact that Obama has totally dropped the ball on health care?
Some change. :eyes:
|
| kenny blankenship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. I have a hard time believing Lieberman is acting on his own with no protection from above |
|
He's their excuse. They can make huge gifts to insurance or pharmaceutical lobbies or other lobbies in other contexts and blame the cave in on Lieberman.
Lieberman! Look what you made us do!! Oh, one of these days, Lieberman, one of these days!
But he still has his committee assignments, he still has his chairmanship. Will he be stripped of his chair after the recess? Let's watch and see.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
