Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New law lets Lynn GE avoid paying personal property taxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:08 PM
Original message
New law lets Lynn GE avoid paying personal property taxes
By David Liscio / The Daily Item

LYNN - A law passed by the state Legislature last year allows Lynn GE to avoid paying taxes on $69 million worth of personal property on site – mostly parts related to its aircraft engine manufacturing operation. The change, effective in fiscal 2010, has left the city's tax collector with a $1.75 million revenue gap, a burden that will be spread to other commercial businesses in Lynn.

The effects of that legislation were particularly acute Tuesday, when the City Council voted to set the new residential and commercial tax rates. The commercial tax rate per $1,000 was increased from the fiscal 2009 level of $25.35 to the fiscal 2010 level of $31.05, among the North Shore's highest.

The residential tax rate was increased per $1,000 of assessed property value from $12.74 to $15.53.

“A lot of the burden for 2010 was shifted over to the commercial side,” said City Assessor Peter Caron. “We lost a significant amount of value at GE in terms of personal property. The Legislature changed the statute and sent me a letter, so we had no recourse. Until then, we had been taxing them on $69 million in military replacement parts, and that amounted to $1.75 million in tax revenue.”

According to Caron, GE was taxed locally because its assets were owned by a partnership, but the new law states than any entity which is not a corporation, but files its federal taxes as a corporation, is then treated as a corporation. “Corporations are not subject to local taxation for their inventories,” Caron explained. “The lost tax dollars from GE were redistributed among other city taxpayers and that has had a more pronounced impact on the commercial property owners. The law was a wild card and we had no control over it.”

Leslie Gould, executive director of the Lynn Area Chamber of Commerce, asked the council to keep the commercial tax rate in check because many local businesses are suffering financially. She noted that the commercial tax rates in most surrounding communities are lower than Lynn's, adding that Peabody, Saugus, Beverly and Revere all have commercial tax rates under $30 per $1,000 of assessed property value.

The City Council also voted Tuesday to use only $350,000 of the $1 million municipal reserve fund to offset the fiscal 2010 tax rates. It was a compromise vote. Had councilors decided to use the entire account, the city would have been left unprotected against unforeseen expenses. Mayor-elect Judith Flanagan Kennedy said she favors not spending any dollars from the reserve account since it must be available for emergencies, such as a loss of state aid.

Caron said the tax rate was also impacted by foreclosure prices, especially among multi-family structures. “Commercial and industrial properties in Lynn went down the least in value, far less than single-family homes, multi-family homes, condominiums and other kinds of property,” he said.

In order the balance the budget, the City Council on Tuesday voted to use $4.6 million in a free-cash account. The free-cash account is comprised of revenues that came in higher than expected and surplus funds from city departments that spent less than expected during the year.

The council's compromise vote will increase the average $3,300 annual residential tax bill by about $149.

Link with comments
http://www.thedailyitemoflynn.com/articles/2009/12/16/updates/doc4b2929102b4dd140926592.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. More sticking it to the little guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Like that city isn't in the shit already.
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 04:15 PM by graywarrior
It's gonna be a ghost town like Berlin NH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know-----sad,isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bad enough I don't recognize the city as the one I grew up in.
Now, with a republican mayor, I don't know what's gonna happen. I'm glad I left there long ago, but still, I grew up there and it's sad to watch it die like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I used to take my kids to Nahant Beach and we'd always detour
for a ride down Lynn Shore Drive because it was so lovely. (This was about 30-35 years ago)

Sorry Lynn lost the GE money----an absolute disgrace.

Sad to see your hometown on a downslide,isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The only saving grace is that it's personal tax.
Still, it's a large chunk of cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. They're not avoiding the taxes. It means the taxes are going to state instead of the city.
In any case, it's stupid that this stuff would be taxable. That's like taxing a brickyard for the unsold bricks on its lot and calling them property. They're going to pay tax on the profits of selling those bricks, so taxing the unsold stuff is effectively like taxing a business twice. Would you go into a store and demand the owner pay tax for everything sitting on the shelf that hasn't been bought yet?

Commercial real estate is going into its own downturn at the moment. In this case I support the state law, I would much rather see this money used for creating jobs than paid in taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Lynn is so corrupt.
So so so corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC