Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama says: Gov. going bankrupt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:02 PM
Original message
Obama says: Gov. going bankrupt
If we don't pass this bill, says the prez, the federal budget will be eaten up by Medicare.

So.... why haven't any of youse wise guys brought that up?

Is Obama pulling our collective legs? Is he making this up? He must be because of the 146,789 threads here on HCR not once has this been mentioned.

Whattsup?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where's the link? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I thought he said it yesterday
and I heard it on Olbermann. I'll look for a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. It is OK, he mentioned that in a general way at the beginning of the whole healthcare debate
The truth is, if the pass the HCR bill as it is currently in the Senate it will accelerate our path to financial disaster

without a public option we are screwed


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Said it explicitly yesterday
He said it was "guaranteed" the fed will go bankrupt:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kbPdfLz1qg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Maybe he should have thought about that before comitting troops to Afghanistan
Thanks for the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. Yeah, coming this late
it sounds like a warning from a Soprano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. The whole thing has got me very depressed /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. well, for one thing, there's BUTTLOADS of money available to solve that problem...
...entirely equitably. Obama just has to stop giving away the farm to the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. That was one of the first things mentioned many months ago...
And many here, including myself, thought we should open up Medicare to anyone who isn't covered under an employer's or some other plan.

This isn't new at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, the 30 billion he just decided to spend killing people who weren't attacking us has nothing to
do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Our deficit is $ 100 billion per month
The $ 30 billion would be a third of one month's deficit.

Things are way more out of control than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well, we're also giving money to Wall Street without any real reform.
I heard that will total in the trillions.

It doesn't sound like much, but it adds up to real money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
48. Like I said
We're a lot more out of control than we realize.

Even without the current mess, we'd be talking about putting medicare and social security back in balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #48
65. Social Security has run growing surpluses for 26 years. "Putting it in balance"
would require repaying 2 trillion dollars borrowed from US workers--much more than is owed to China.

That would require raising income taxes back to pre-Bush levels on the top 1% of tax-payers--you know, the ones who got unprecedented reductions from Bush, partly funded by the SS surpluses extracted from US workers.

"Putting SS & MC in balance" = code for ripping off the lower & middle class to fund the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #48
74. When it comes right down to it, there are X dollars to go around
and we have to decide how they get distributed.

If we stopped wasting the money (and the time and resources that the money represents) we'd be a lot better off.

Beyond that, what's happened is that interest groups have pressured politicians to set up the tax structure and other laws (like the minimum wage) so that they get to keep almost all of the money and then look at the rest of us, shrug, and say, "Gee, that's all there is left for you."

Things are out of control because of that. We didn't have to allow that to happen, and we don't have to allow it to go on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
50. +500
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. No matter what passes,
we'll be bankrupt. The spending is out of control. Begun by Bush and accelerated by Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. From what I've read, it's true..
And it's exactly what the Republicans want. No medicare and a broke Democratic administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Imagine all the cash we'll save if we pull out of Afghanistan and Iraq!
Money to kill strangers but none to keep Americans healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. of course...it's the Amerikan way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tell the government to get in the back of the line if it wants the free soup.
No cutters allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why didn't they use fear tactics in the first place?
That's what sold everyone on the war

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:08 PM
Original message
Brilliant point!
Fear, it seems, is best used AGAINST progressives in the DEMOCRATIC party and not FOR single payer or even a public option. We always seem to be staring into business end of the fear gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. We are a long way past bankruptcy (thats without Medicare or anything else)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. "Reagan proved deficits don't matter" - Dick Cheney 2002
As always, Republican Cheney was wrong. Deficits do matter.

But Japan, Germany, France and Belgium have higher public debt as percentage of GDP ratios than the US.
People aren't going berserk about it.
Under FDR, Truman and Eisenhower the US ratio was 60-120%. Under Bush 41 it was nearly 70%.
Japan is currently at 170%, but they have a higher standard of living than we do.

If we want $2.85 trillion, just let the Bush tax cuts expire next year. Remember that Shrub rammed through a $1.35 trillion tax cut in 2001 and a $1.5 trillion tax cut in 2003.

Lowering defense spending to Clinton levels would save $4 trillion over ten years.

Now mandate Swedish health spending levels ($2,750 per year/per person) in the US and we save another $14.6 trillion over 10 years.

Recap savings over ten years:

1. No Bush tax cuts = $2.85 trillion
2. Clinton level defense spending = $4 trillion
3. Swedish-level health spending = $14.6 trillion
+ Ban all aid to the private banking system. This will take uncertainty out of the system. Like us regular folks, they're on their own.

Total saved over ten years = $21.45 trillion.
National debt retired, return to surplus by 2018.

Rich people, defense contractors, private health insurance companies and bankers won't be happy, but it can be done.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. If Obama said it, take it with a truckload of salt
He said a public option was the best way to save money at one time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. i mentioned it here just yesterday...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=7234733&mesg_id=7236751

we WON'T have to wait another 16 years...

ever-increasing healthcare costs will have bankrupted the country by then. if something else doesn't do it first.


in response to this-

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=7234733&mesg_id=7236308

Dunno. On the one hand, I think that Obama really really really wants a bill passed.

Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 01:17 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
If we kill it, he might consider reconciliation much more seriously. I think that's what Dr. Dean is getting at.

On the other, I'm afraid we'll have to wait another 16 years.



now, you were saying...? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. How can anyone be so naive to think we are not in debt? Where is the common sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Then stop funding endless fucking wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Hear, hear!
Those are some kind of priorities he has. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Seriously..it's very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W_HAMILTON Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Yep.
Isn't defense the largest expenditure of our national government?

Cut back on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
59. No, Medicare is the largest expenditure.
Medicare and Social Security dwarf defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W_HAMILTON Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #59
67. I wonder what I saw, then...
...it was a pie chart showing that defense was like 50% of the chart, but if it's not total expenditures, I don't know what it could have been referencing. Do you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #67
73. That was probably only showing discretionary parts of the budget.
In other words, it's a misleading chart that shows some of the federal budget but leaves out the HUGE entitlement spending of Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, etc.

Perhaps it was something like this:


Yes, defense is the biggest part of our discretionary budget--what Congress can choose to spend more or less on--but it is not the biggest part of the overall federal budget. Medicare is.

The real budget would look something like this:



That one's a little old, and it looks like Social Security, not Medicare, is the bigger entitlement expenditure. That will change in the next few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. STOP making sense! "National security!!!" "National interests!!!"
Focus on the talking points, would you?

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
76. "...our Glorious Fatherland!"
I mean, Homeland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushknew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
46. Exactly nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. Ripped right from the fear tactics guide book
of Bush Cheney. Big surprise there :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. IS there a link to this, because I still have hope for Obama but if
he's going to attempt to blackmail us then there is no hope at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Mushroom cloud! Economic crash! Terrorists under your bed!
Where have we seen these tactics before?

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Thanks for the link and he just flat out lied that this bill is the best ...
chance to bend the cost curve on expenditures.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. This is closely related:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. let's see, 23 trillion to the banks doesn't have anything to do with it ,does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Of course not
Neither do the trillions spent on the occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.

:sarcasm:
:sarcasm:
:sarcasm:
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. Then ROLL BACK THE REAGAN TAX CUTS
This isn't fucking rocket science!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. Wasn't that the campaign rant we heard over and over?
Taxes were going to be raised on those making over $250,000? Another change we can't believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
37. And then we won't have any more money for war...
:nopity:

It's just more bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
38. Be afraid - be very afraid!!!
Sounds like Obama has hired Bush's old speech writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
51. yea how about that folksy populist fat cat banker talk the other day, revolting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. End our foreign wars, tax the rich, and stop them from moving wealth overseas.
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 08:36 PM by StarfarerBill
Oh, and do something about the debt, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
41. Make the wealthy pay their fair share and end two pointless wars.
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 09:43 PM by Edweird
Then talk about raising taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
42. At the last fucking moment, he resorts to fearmongering?
That's pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
45. Massive famine if this bill doesn't pass. Guaranteed.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
47. Communist China will save our ass...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
49. is this fear-mongering? sounds like it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #49
62. What's next - God will call me home if the bill isn't passed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeCanWorkItOut Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
53. The President is mistaken. Medicare inflation must be controlled. Many ways to do that
Peter Orszag has been talking a long time about how
it's not even the aging of the Baby Boomers that is the problem.
It's just the rate at which Medicare costs have been rising,
mainly due to technological change, and, I would argue,
increased monopoly power by doctors and hospitals,
and abuses of imaging, etc.

These problems could be managed.
But they don't have to be managed by hurting the elderly so much,
and burdening the working class so heavily,
as the Democrats propose to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #53
64. just wait til Brad de Long gets to be Treas secy, he wants to end Soc Sec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
54. He's had about a year to rip back the richie tax cut. Nada zip nutt'n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
55. "Pass this bill or I'll shoot this dog"
I swear he's just making this shit up as he goes along...

I mean really this is getting fucking laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
56. This is why...
http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm



Stop the fucking wars and close the over seas bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
57. Amazing how important the budget becomes when you're talking about
actual Americans, as opposed to "American interests".

We've always got money for banks, wars, etc. Price is no object.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #57
66. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
58. Stop the fucking wars Obama-that's where the money is being wasted.
Check out the cost of the wars so far-OVER 900 BILLION!!!

http://www.costofwar.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
60. Ok, so lay off the republicans, and cut off their free health insurance.
And stop funding the military industrial complex through illegal wars.

That'll save a lot of money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
61. Medicare is being eaten up by
1) Medicare Advantage programs. Plans that are run by private insurance, according to their rules, but that Medicare has to give them money for if the stupid senior citizen involved signs up for them. Believe me they are no advantage regardless of what they promise. My husband got hoodwinked into one of them to his great regret.

2) Medicare Part D, the prescription drug plan of donut hole fame. But there is more to it than that. First there is no Medicare plan to buy into. You have to purchase it from a private insurance company. Next, there is no cost control for the pharmaceuticals. They can charge what they like and Medicare has to pay. This program was originally conceived of as a way to bankrupt Medicare by Republicans so that it would be legislated out of existence.

Get rid of the Medicare Advantage programs and offer seniors full coverage and prescription drugs for an additional premium to be determined by Medicare and deducted from their SS, it will put Medicare back on track and probably cost much less than the seniors are shelling out for additional insurance and/or copays, etc. today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #61
71. +1. Seems like the modern strategy is to pass legislation to take down
the new deal by stealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
63. You Seem To Have Plenty of Money For Your Wars, Obama,
Take your whining and shove it up your lying ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
68. Yes, and HR 676 would have saved Medicare and covered the whole damned country but noooo
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 06:13 AM by laughingliberal
The insurance companies deserve their profits. This bill provides a bandaid for Medicare, at best. We'll be back looking at Medicare going broke very soon. Berananke is talking "entitlement reform." I did not hear him say, "unless you pass the Senate bill, then Medicare is saved."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
69. You know I thought I'd never say this to a democratic president.
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 06:22 AM by Xicano
Obama, why don't you just STFU! and go fuck yourself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
70. It's funny he didn't mention the possibility of bankruptcy in connection
with the wars or the bailouts?:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
72. Eliminate the $100,000 dollar cap on Soc Sec, POOF infinite money for medicare and Soc Sec
In addition the Government needs to own and operate at least ONE generic drug factory.
Everyone on Gov assistance has to get those first, if possible...and since the government has FUNDED NEARLY ALL MEDICAL RESEARCH IN THE LAST 100+ YEARS, we should OWN the fucking rights to ALL drugs, to be made "generically"

That would save countless billions a year right there.

Beyond that simply enforcing the tax law on corporations and the rich would also rake in billions.

That's without even rolling the TOP RATE taxes to where they were during the gop's fap-fest-favorite ray-gun.

poof enough money to start pay down the debt and give everyone health care. hell there may even be money left over for their little wars.

But common sense has no place in governemnt, especially not the current American one.

I'm so ashamed to be happy to be living over seas. i WANT to be proud to be an American but I just am not.

I am a American-European now =\

-A patriot in Exile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
75. "The Audacity of fear".
Too bad, so sad.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC