Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the Clinton 1993-94 health care bill have been passed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:00 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should the Clinton 1993-94 health care bill have been passed
Remember that bill had no public option or Medicare expansion in it whatsoever. While government's role in health insurance was expanded significantly, their bill fundamentally relied upon private insurance to deliver insurance services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Like This One, It Was A Wet Kiss To The Insurers
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 09:07 PM by MannyGoldstein
Rebuffed by the insurers, the Clintons had to move on to offshoring our jobs and repealing Glass-Steagall to make their fortune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Should the emancipation proclamation have been signed?
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 09:04 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
It did nothing about the status of slaves outside the Confederacy.

But it was a long time ago when standards of progressive progress were not so advanced.



If you have something to say about HCR in this century, go for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Funny how the insurance companies don't try this scam when a Repuke is president. What's up with
dat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Totally different circumstances back then, the Clintons weren't elected to pass HCR.
There asshats were.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. It would have been a great stepping stone for single-payer today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Good point.....If it had gotten passed, maybe we'd be much further along in this debate.
And we wouldn't be dealing with all of this foolishness now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. yes
The Clinton health care plan was much stronger.

There would have been 3 health care plans that people would have been entitled to. There would have been much stronger regulations on the insurers. There would have been a strong employer mandate instead of this stupid personal mandate. Everyone would have gotten a health card that could never be taken away. There were much stronger bans on exclusions by insurers. The savings generated by the plan would have been reinvested in health care. It was a much stronger plan than this monstrosity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Bull. The insurance companies would have watered it down long before it saw the light of day.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. nonsense
this question is about what was in the bill. The bill was just as I described.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Doesn't matter - it would not have passed nor did anything since the nation was founded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC