bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:00 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Should the Clinton 1993-94 health care bill have been passed |
|
Remember that bill had no public option or Medicare expansion in it whatsoever. While government's role in health insurance was expanded significantly, their bill fundamentally relied upon private insurance to deliver insurance services.
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Like This One, It Was A Wet Kiss To The Insurers |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 09:07 PM by MannyGoldstein
Rebuffed by the insurers, the Clintons had to move on to offshoring our jobs and repealing Glass-Steagall to make their fortune.
|
Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Should the emancipation proclamation have been signed? |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 09:04 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
It did nothing about the status of slaves outside the Confederacy.
But it was a long time ago when standards of progressive progress were not so advanced.
If you have something to say about HCR in this century, go for it.
|
timeforpeace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Funny how the insurance companies don't try this scam when a Repuke is president. What's up with |
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Totally different circumstances back then, the Clintons weren't elected to pass HCR. |
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message |
6. It would have been a great stepping stone for single-payer today. |
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Good point.....If it had gotten passed, maybe we'd be much further along in this debate. |
|
And we wouldn't be dealing with all of this foolishness now.
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The Clinton health care plan was much stronger.
There would have been 3 health care plans that people would have been entitled to. There would have been much stronger regulations on the insurers. There would have been a strong employer mandate instead of this stupid personal mandate. Everyone would have gotten a health card that could never be taken away. There were much stronger bans on exclusions by insurers. The savings generated by the plan would have been reinvested in health care. It was a much stronger plan than this monstrosity.
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Bull. The insurance companies would have watered it down long before it saw the light of day. |
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
this question is about what was in the bill. The bill was just as I described.
|
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-16-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Doesn't matter - it would not have passed nor did anything since the nation was founded |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message |