Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fla. man exonerated after 35 years behind bars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 02:01 PM
Original message
Fla. man exonerated after 35 years behind bars
I can only imagine how many would have called for this man's head had the incident he was convicted of taken place the past few years.

Death Penalty this! :nuke:



Fla. man exonerated after 35 years behind bars

BARTOW, Fla. (AP) — James Bain used a cell phone for the first time Thursday, calling his elderly mother to tell her he had been freed after 35 years behind bars for a crime he did not commit.

Mobile devices didn't exist in 1974, the year he was sentenced to life in prison for kidnapping a 9-year-old boy and raping him in a nearby field.

Neither did the sophisticated DNA testing that officials more recently used to determine he could not have been the rapist.

"Nothing can replace the years Jamie has lost," said Seth Miller, a lawyer for the Florida Innocence Project, which helped Bain win freedom. "Today is a day of renewal."

Bain spent more time in prison than any of the 246 inmates previously exonerated by DNA evidence nationwide, according to the project. The longest-serving before him was James Lee Woodward of Dallas, who was released last year after spending more than 27 years in prison for a murder he did not commit.

As Bain walked out of the Polk County courthouse Thursday, wearing a black T-shirt that said "not guilty," he spoke of his deep faith and said he does not harbor any anger.

"No, I'm not angry," he said. "Because I've got God."

The 54-year-old said he looks forward to eating fried turkey and drinking Dr Pepper. He said he also hopes to go back to school.

Friends and family surrounded him as he left the courthouse after Judge James Yancey ordered him freed. His 77-year-old mother, who is in poor health, preferred to wait for him at home. With a broad smile, he said he looks forward to spending time with her and the rest of his family.

"That's the most important thing in my life right now, besides God," he said.

Earlier, the courtroom erupted in applause after Yancey ruled.

"Mr. Bain, I'm now signing the order," Yancey said. "You're a free man. Congratulations."

more: http://enews.earthlink.net/article/us?guid=20091217/ab669ad6-8e05-4b12-8dc8-a07b17ab42a6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. See? The system works! No harm, no foul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope to hell you're making a joke.
It feels like it is, but I've seen too many DUers say remarkably crazy things to be absolutely sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I've heard similarly insane remarks.
Even on DU, and they weren't making a joke. DP proponents when faced with a list of last minute exonerations of people found to be innocent, I'd get in response a reply very similar to the one above. As if the DP is flawless and never would the exoneration come too late, it always comes just in time like in the movies. Some of them are seriously delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No death penalty...ever.
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 11:30 AM by Iggo
My position is "If killing is wrong, then killing is wrong" and I ain't budging no way no how. Not up for debate.

EDIT: I was hoping it was obvious that no one, not even the staunchest death supporters, would think that 35 years behind bars was "no harm".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
change_notfinetuning Donating Member (750 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. How long has this "sophisticated DNA" been available? That's the real
question. That technology should be employed in every single case where we have the ability to prove or disprove their innocence. Keeping people in prison when we know, or could know, that they are innocent should be a crime in itself. That one, we are all guilty of. And, for those who have been executed, we are collectively guilty of murder. Nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC