Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Correct me if I am wrong...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 04:53 PM
Original message
Correct me if I am wrong...
Ok. After this bill gets 60 votes in the Senate, it goes to conference to be merged with the House bill. Once that is accomplished, it simply needs to pass with a 51 vote majority, correct? Theoretically, the public option could be put back in, and there would be nothing that Nelson, Lieberman, Landrieu, or the other fuckers can do about it.

Or, even though this could happen, it won't, because we have no leadership and we just can't break the promises we made to Joementum! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm pretty sure it's still subject to a cloture vote, which will need 60 votes
If only it were that easy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well FUCK.
There goes MY hopes. I was cynically barely holding on before now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, cloture again requiring 60 but without debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. maybe they can just glue the 2 pages together with the public option mention

shhhh, I won't tell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. You are correct under normal circumstances. However , in this
particular instance they are seriously trying to do a
"ping=pong" move. That is get the House to simply accept
the Senate Bill as is. This is because it took so much
just to get this thing through the Senate. The Senate
will not accept the House Bill. Pretty much the Senate
Bill seems to be it.

The Conference of Merging the two bills might be too darned
hard in other words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC