Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Moore threatens boycott over Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:22 PM
Original message
Michael Moore threatens boycott over Lieberman
Michael Moore threatens boycott over Lieberman
Posted 35m ago

NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) — Liberal filmmaker Michael Moore is threatening to organize a boycott of Connecticut in response to Sen. Joseph Lieberman's opposition to key parts of federal health care legislation.

Moore tells The Associated Press he will launch the boycott if Lieberman continues to block the bill and residents fail to pressure him to change his mind. He called for residents to hold rallies and flood Lieberman's office with phone calls and e-mails.

Moore says he will organize millions to boycott Connecticut businesses that have supported Lieberman.

Lieberman, a Connecticut independent, has threatened to join Republicans in blocking health care overhaul over government-run insurance and an expansion of Medicare.

Telephone messages were left Thursday with a Lieberman spokeswoman.


http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2009-12-17-moore-lieberman_N.htm?csp=34



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was born & raised in CT, and Michael Moore is way out of line here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why? I wouldn't mind if he did it in my state. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And what *you* would do is always the most imperative consideration when evaluating any action, eh?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What an ignorant response. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I thought the same thing about reply #2 in this thread. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Hopefully, beachmom is not quite as knee-jerk foolish as you obviously are. nt
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 05:46 PM by polichick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Hopefully she, or anyone else over the age of two, is not as self-centered as you obviously are. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. LOL - all this because I said I wouldn't mind if Moore did this in my state. LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yeah, people who automatically assume every topic is ultimately about THEM are laughable. Spot on.
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 05:57 PM by apocalypsehow
:thumbsup:

Edit: stray modifier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. No offense, but you're an idiot. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. None taken - people often react angrily to the truth, especially when it's about themselves. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. You're projecting. I'm laughing my butt off - that's why the "LOLs" :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. A singular wit, to coin a phrase, is best employed where a person can't see the laugh is on them.
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 06:06 PM by apocalypsehow
So you're all good. :thumbsup:

Edit: grammar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Wait for it...wait for it...
A switch back to the snarl because the "LOLs" didn't garner the last word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I've driven through Connecticut and have no problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. how so? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. if people want to boycott alaska over palin, I'm down for it. I agree
with Moore. That douchebag needs to feel the heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope his boycott includes abstaining from espousing his political opinions.
The wingnuts have Rush... we have Moore.
Both are the cause of many facepalm. >_<
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. For instance?
Rush espouses wingnut POVs. Moore is a social democrat. Explain how those are equivalent.

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. What do you mean "we?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. Moore speaks for me and millions of others. he knows the need of
health care from his many films and I hope he kneecaps that fucking lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Michael Moore who?
No thanks. I'd rather keep boycotting his so-called movies than boycott the people in the name of helping the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Have you seen any of his movies and if so which ones didn't you like
Maybe you could tell us why as well. I thought they were exceptional documentaries, but maybe your insight could influence my opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. Yes, I have seen enough to form an opinion
Roger & Me: Entertaining while still getting out some good info. Made for the people.
Canadian Bacon: Silly, pointless type of comedy that I am always drawn to. Remember enjoying it. Made to make people laugh.
TV Nation (TV series): Have only seen a couple, but nothing original enough to make me want more. Made for the people, but also to promote a certain view.

Bowling for Columbine: Full of half-truths and spin with sad attempts at dry humor. First of his movies that I had seen where HIS view seems to be more important than the truth. Made to influence people into accepting his view as the only acceptable truth.
F-9/11: Half-truths, spin and alot of twisting of facts made only to make a group of people look bad in any way possible. Made for ideological reasons.

Add in interviews where he says stupid shit like all Americans should pay 70, 80, 90 percent of all their earnings to the govt and it is easy to see that he is now more interested in pushing his ideology than he is with informing the people.

I prefer a "here is what is happening" rather than "here is what you should believe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. You haven't seen his movies?
Then you don't know what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. i want to know how one boycotts connecticut?
i've never been there. don't have plans to go. i don't have any products that i know of from there. seriously, wtf does boycott connecticut mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. So, you have been boycotting for a long time?
Me too. Never been there, no plans to in the future. I guess i am currently boycotting 46 of the contiguous 48. Since I live on the border of Texas and Okla., I do wander into Okla. on occasion. But, only at night, and I always wear a disguise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. i guess virtually everybody has been boycotting connecticut, forever
and lol about OK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. read further. "Moore says he will organize millions to boycott Connecticut businesses that have
supported Lieberman." Sounds fair to me. They dont have to be CT businesses.

I dont support action against the state but do against anyone that supported Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. Worked really well for Bill O'Reilly.
I can't wait for the Connecticut Business Review to show what kind of impact this boycott will have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Well, Connecticut could become the new Texas.
I heard Bush was from Connecticut anyway.

/Big Grin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC