Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember this: "Anonymous White House Official Slams Liberals Over Public Option"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:20 PM
Original message
Remember this: "Anonymous White House Official Slams Liberals Over Public Option"


http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/anonymous-white-house-official-slams-liberals-over-public-option.php

In case progressives were beginning to feel as if the Obama administration doesn't really care what they think, they can rest assured: the White House hears them loud and clear. It just doesn't like the message.

"I don't understand why the left of the left has decided that this is their Waterloo," an anonymous senior White House adviser tells the Washington Post. "We've gotten to this point where health care on the left is determined by the breadth of the public option. I don't understand how that has become the measure of whether what we achieve is health-care reform."

That's probably not a characterization--"left of the left"--liberals would have chosen for more than five dozen members of the Democratic caucus. And it doesn't exactly inspire faith that the White House sees the public option as more than a sliver of reform. But it also doesn't suggest they're expecting House progressives to fold.

And, in a bit of good news for progressives, it comes just as White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel--who could even be the Post's anonymous official--tells the New York Times that the GOP "has made a strategic decision that defeating President Obama's health care proposal is more important for their political goals than solving the health insurance problems that Americans face every day."

If health care bipartisanship is dead or dying, then the public option suddenly loses much (though certainly not all) of its political volatility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. 80% of Democrats want the PO. Does that seem like the left of the left?
Why is the POTUS and his staff painting the Democratic party as fringe? This is a big mistake. Do they honestly think they will keep their seats in 2010 and 2012? This is a very bad thing that they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This was in August. In fact the majority of all U.S. citizens want a public option /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. we're a bunch of fringe moonbats-- didn't you get the memo?
See, the 20 percent that doesn't care about a public option or any other variant of non-private medical insurance is the "middle."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Oh crap! It was in my In Box all this time! I better put on my cape....
and fly off (it being night and all).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. they don't want to unhinge the revolving door from government to
business to government. I personally hope this dork burns in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is not a progressive White House.
We might as well process that and figure out if there's any way to interact with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sad, but true, and your advice is sound.
You should start a thread posing that question so that we can brainstorm some strategies. What we're doing now obviously isn't working.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Waters Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. A possible strategy
I wonder if we could get through to them if a lot of us who donated to the 2008 campaign picked one day and did a massive unsubscribe to OFA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Welcome to DU.
We need every idea we can get because it's clear we're not getting through to the powers that be.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Does this mean I have to re-subscribe, and try to remove their emails from my spam filter?
I guess it's a worthy cause and all... so if need be I can endure the hassle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Cut off the cash
No money for the DNC. No money for Obama. Make all contributions directly to progressive house candidates. One could start with Sestak. Anyone wanna start a "redraft Dean for 2012" committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. if this is the way it is, I will consider any serious candidate against
Obama in 2012. I have family and I want them to have even the smallest illusion that this is the America I can remember for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. 100% correct
I was slow in understanding that, but this week let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. "...could even be..."
I think that falls under the category of "no sh*t, Sherlock."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. "I don't understand"
And thats your fucking problem right there. You live in the beltway bubble and have no fucking idea what the real world is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. "...White House Official Slams Liberals ..."
Never thought I'd see those five words together with a Democratic president.

A good friend of mine has recently started calling the president oBUSHa. I'm beginning to understand why...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. "the left of the left has decided that this is their Waterloo" - It is not this
issue alone. It the list of failures for me. This is why I keep the SNL skit about Obama's lack of accomplishments thus far in my signature.

He is not prepared to be the head of the executive branch or head of the party. He needs to replace Gates, Geithner, and why did he nominate Bernanke?

From this "left of the left" voter, he continues to show poor judgement. This was characteristic of his first year in office; this will be characteristic of his only term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Tee-hee. On the one hand were irrelevant, on the other dangerous.
They ignore, or vilify, the left at their peril. Ask LBJ and President Humphrey how that worked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. an anonymous source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Son Of Wendigo Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
19. Obama is no progressive
Compared to the subhuman monstrosity who infested the White House before him, Obama seemed at first to be a breath of fresh air to those of us who so desperately wanted an honest America back. After a year, in issue after issue, Obama has revealed that he is no friend to us progressives and is not one himself. He talks a good game, but when it comes down to action, he has repeated betrayed us and sold us out. Nixon, Reagan, and Dubya were evil horrors, but everyone knew what they were getting when they each became president. Obama is sly. He is the stealth anti-progressive. I trusted him, no mean trick for any politician to achieve from me, but I never will again. I hope that the progressives run a real progressive against him in 2012. He is ruined as a president, and as far as I am concerned, as a human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. "left of the left" = Democratic wing of the Democratic Party
Ok, bad form. Rahm is not concerned about health care. He is concerned about securing corporate donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC