Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vicki Kennedy: The moment Ted Kennedy would not want to lose

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:38 PM
Original message
Vicki Kennedy: The moment Ted Kennedy would not want to lose
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/vicki-kennedy-backs-health-care-bill-finish-the-work-of-his-life.php

"Health care would finally be a right, and not a privilege, for the citizens of this country. While my husband believed in a robust public option as an effective way to lower costs and increase competition, he also believed in not losing sight of the forest for the trees. As long as he wasn't compromising his principles or values, he looked for a way forward.

As President Obama noted to Congress this fall, for Ted, health-care reform was not a matter of ideology or politics. It was not about left or right, Democrat or Republican. It was a passion born from the experience of his own life, the experience of our family and the experiences of the millions of Americans across this country who considered him their senator, too.

The bill before Congress will finally deliver on the urgent needs of all Americans. It would make their lives better and do so much good for this country. That, in the end, must be the test of reform. That was always the test for Ted Kennedy. He's not here to urge us not to let this chance slip through our fingers. So I humbly ask his colleagues to finish the work of his life, the work of generations, to allow the vote to go forward and to pass health-care reform now. As Ted always said, when it's finally done, the people will wonder what took so long."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shame, shame, shame
Obama Administration probably push for her to make this statement. Is there no end to their madness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. You're insulting Vickie Kennedy. She's smart and capable enough
to know her own mind on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Sure
But not the first 'smart' person to be pressured into 'writing' and op-ed for the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, they're really getting desperate
Exploiting a grieving widow

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. +1
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. No kidding. And this was already posted in GD:P. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought I couldn't be more pissed off
I was wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Replies #1 & #2 seem to suggest Obama put her up to it... No proof of this.
So I will not make such silly assumptions.

Teddy would have been incredibly useful in this process, but he's not here.

That Vicki penned this Op Ed makes me proud and I believe that Teddy would have wanted to get this moving toward reconciliation and passage.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Don't be such a patsy.
We all know how politics is played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. This bill makes us slaves to the health insurance industry
Sen. Ted Kennedy would not be proud of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You do know that Kennedy wanted Medicare For All, right?

A Democratic Blueprint for America's Future

by US Senator Ted Kennedy
An Address by Senator Edward M. Kennedy at the National Press Club
January 12, 2005

...........

The answer is Medicare, whose 40th birthday we will celebrate in July. I propose that as a 40th birthday gift to the American people, we expand Medicare over the next decade to cover every citizen - from birth to the end of life.

It's no secret that America is still dearly in love with Medicare. Administrative costs are low. Patients' satisfaction is high. Unlike with many private insurers, they can still choose their doctor and their hospital.

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0112-37.htm


Apparently he forgot to mention it to his wife?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You do know that Kennedy understood how the Senate works, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I believe he'd been around long enough to know what a majority looked like
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. And you think he would have stomped his feet and voted NO???
Not a chance. Not this year, not all at once for everyone.

WANTING something and GETTING it all at once or right away is just not in the realm of possibilities.

Good Senators know this, accept it, and find out how to get there over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Byron Dorgan
chairs the DPC. It's report.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unlimited freedom for the Insurance Cartel without restrictions like
anti-trust? Without Swiss-like regulations?

Sorry Vicki, this is a poison pill.

If this is what Teddy wanted, he would have negotiated it this way rather than have his PO (and other amendments) up for consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. As long as he wasn't compromising his principles or values,
Well that says something right there. No one has any idea what he would have done here, because compromises have been made that he probably wouldn't have allowed or worked around. I said yesterday that he wouldn't have supported this bill but I'm not his wife, she should know better. But I also know that SCHIP was his baby and with this bill they are going to kill it or shift it to the childrens defense fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC