Should information about women who get abortions

[mzteris]

be posted online?

:wtf:

CNN Poll

cnn.com


I repeat, :wtf: are they thinking?

At least the majority are saying NO, but WTF prompted the poll?????

[MineralMan]

1. Oklahoma caused it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7268325

[SharonAnn]

14. Will they post the names of the men who get Viagra, etc. online, too?

[FLDCVADem]

16. They won't post the names of anyone

The law is ridiculous, but posting names is not part of it.

[cbdo2007]

17. Who cares? The comparison of abortion to viagra hurts the pro-choice

argument much more than it helps it. Abortion and Viagra have nothing to do with each other.

[Lars39]

18. It's female reproductive health versus male reproductive health.

The male is fully covered, the female is not.

[cbdo2007]

22. What's "reproductive" about viagra? It's male sexual health versus

female reproductive health.

They're completely different and comparing the two is stupid.

A better comparison is whether or not any pregnancy benefits exist versus abortion benefits, as the act of getting pregnant can occur in both cases by accident (whether they birth the kid or abort it), so why should benefits cover a pregnancy that occurred by accident but not the termination of the same one.

We're fighting on the same team here, I just hate the comparison of abortion to viagra because each one is a different remedy to a completely different problem brought on for completely different reasons.

[lunatica]

2. All the talk about abortions is for ratings too

:sarcasm:

[virgogal]

3. Of course not.

[Incitatus]

4. There's that little thing called doctor patient confidnetiality.

Yes, what the fuck was CNN thinking when the made this poll?

[Jamastiene]

7. Not for women who have an abortion in Oklahoma

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/oklahoma-abortion-law-to_n_328412.html

[Jamastiene]

5. There is a law that does that in Oklahoma

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/oklahoma-abortion-law-to_n_328412.html

[Ozymanithrax]

6. No!

Nor should the names of adulturous lovers, or men arrested for soliciting a prostitute.

But we are talking about Oklahoma, here. They do not define freedom in quite the same way as most of us.

[G_j]

8. should witches be burned?

something along that line...

:wtf: is right!

[rubberducky]

9. Should we post a list of all men who order viagra???

CNN just got a nasty letter from me on just how incredibly stupid this question is. My body is MY body, your body is YOUR body. I won`t presume to tell you what to do with your`s, don`t presume to tell me what to do with mine.

[MadMaddie]

10. This is the path that will have to be taken to stop this illegal

nonsense. They scream about the government staying out of their lives but they attempt to wield the government to interfere in womens lives.

[GreenPartyVoter]

11. Absolutely not!!!!!!!!!!!!

[RB TexLa]

12. It shouldn't even be taken.

The only question asked should be "how do you want to pay?"

[unabelladonna]

13. the morons better think before they pass it

i'd love to know whose wives, girlfriends, mothers, sisters, daughters, aunts etc. of these assholes have had abortions.

[Odin2005]

15. HELL NO!

Sounds like a method of intimidation and humiliation. People won't get an abortion because they won't be able to keep it private and will be harassed and shunned by family and neighbors.

[RC]

21. Bingo! That is exactly the reason.

[jwirr]

19. NO

[bigwillq]

20. Nope, not at all

and some Oklahoma state senator was on CNN the other day touting this shit. What a puke fest.

[Th1onein]

23. Fuck no.

I'm anti-abortion, but get real.