Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's been a one party system for some time now hasn't it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:09 AM
Original message
It's been a one party system for some time now hasn't it?
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 01:10 AM by shadowknows69
Now they're so sure they have all the pieces in place for checkmate that they barely even try to hide it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Since, in fact, the Kennedy assassination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WT Fuheck Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. since Nov 1963,
but comments like that used to get people tombstoned at DU...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I try not to worry about being tombstoned, but I have to speak my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WT Fuheck Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. thanks for doing so.
It's increasingly idiotic to remain a rah rah loyalist when faced with the treachery of recent times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. A political king-making, dynasty of wealth changed it.... how?
JFK wasn't exactly anti-corporate wealth, or a believer in universal social equality.

He was a Kennedy, for Pete's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WT Fuheck Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. the MIC hated him.
The "national security" cabal hated him.

The proto-neocons hated him.

He left the generals holding their war hardons at the Bay of Pigs and during the Cuban Missile Crisis. He was threatening to do the same in Viet Nam, where his early enthusiasm showed clear signs of waning. His brother Bobby was nosing around in illegal conspiracies the oligarchs didn't want him looking into.

If he hadn't been wealthy, he'd never have been able to run in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ildem09 Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. To fix this
we need two things

1) Ordinal balloting with transferable vote

2) a complete ban on private campaign contributions or any kind not from a person or corporation everyone pays 3 bucks on their taxes and thats how its funded,

those are the only ways i see to enact real change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. in my opinion, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. There is always the party of In Feces, On Couch Masturbating
Its growing in popularity at the moment. Hey, as George Carlin somewhat said, at least when they are done masturbating they actually get off (as opposed to the ballot casters).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. yes it has
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, if you mean the DLC and the Republicans look like one party
Yes. But the teabaggers are splintering off from the Republicans and the progressives are now feeling dismissed and will probably start splintering off too. So it looks more like three parties, or at least three completely different ideologies are forming. The Religious Extreme Right, the Rich Right merging with the Rich DLC (which includes the Blue Dog Democrats), and the Liberal Progressives.

Perhaps in the next Congressional elections some Progressives will run against the Blue Dog Democrats and we won't lose those seats to Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Since 1787.
Those with conventional power have always had more political power than those without.

It's kind of part of the country, always has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. One of our DUers put it rather well a short time back
I thought: All the distinction anymore of claiming your car is a Ford or a Mercury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yup and now they don't even care that
we know since the takeover is complete. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum
Republicrats
etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC