Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On "Cooling the Mark" Out- for those feeling betrayed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
coti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:22 AM
Original message
On "Cooling the Mark" Out- for those feeling betrayed
This is a great piece I'd found online and favorited long ago. I'm compelled to share it with others who feel more than just a little taken advantage of by those who gave us this corporatist healthcare bill.

---------

On Cooling the Mark Out*
Some Aspects of Adaptation to Failure

Erving Goffman†

In cases of criminalfraud, victims find they must suddenly adapt themselves to the loss of sources of security and status which they had taken for granted. A consideration of this adaptation to loss can lead us to an understanding of some relations in our society between involvements and the selves that are involved. In the argot of the criminal world, the term "mark" refers to any individual who is a victim or prospective victim of certain forms of planned illegal exploitation. The mark is the sucker‑the person who is taken in. An instance of the operation of any particular racket, taken through the full cycle of its steps or phases, is sometimes called a play. The persons who operate the racket and "take" the mark are occasionally called operators.

The confidence game‑the con, as its practitioners call it‑is a way of obtaining money under false pretenses by the exercise of fraud and deceit. The con differs from politer forms of financial deceit in important ways. The con is practiced on private persons by talented actors who methodically and regularly build up informal social relationships just for the purpose of abusing them; white‑collar crime is practiced on organizations by persons who learn to abuse positions of trust which they once filled faithfully. The one exploits, poise; the other, position. Further, a con man is someone who accepts a social role in the underworld community; he is part of a brotherhood whose members make no pretense to one another of being "legit." A white‑collar criminal, on the other hand, has no colleagues, al­though he may have an associate with whom he plans his crime and a wife to whom he confesses it.

<snip>

Sometimes, however, a mark is not quite prepared to accept his loss as a gain in experience and to say and do nothing about his venture. He may feel moved to complain to the police or to chase after the operators. In the terminology of the trade, the mark may squawk, beef, or come through. From the operators' point of view, this kind of behavior is bad for business. It gives the members of the mob a bad reputation with such police as have not. yet been fixed and with marks who have not yet been taken. In order to avoid this adverse publicity, an additional phase is sometimes added at the end of the play. It is called cooling the mark out After the blowoff has occurred, one of the operators stays with the mark and makes an effort to keep the anger of the mark within manageable and sensible proportions. The operator stays behind his team‑mates in the capacity of what might be called a cooler and exercises upon the mark the art of consolation. An attempt is made to define the situation for the mark in a way that makes it easy for him to accept the inevitable and quietly go home. The mark is given instruction in the philosophy of taking a loss.

---------------

Read the whole article, it's quite interesting:

http://www.tau.ac.il/~algazi/mat/Goffman--Cooling.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
johnlal Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. I like the analogy, but where's the blowoff?
I don't mind feeling victimized if they'll just go away! But it's either Warrantless Wiretapping, or "Impeachment is off the Table", or Lieberman endorses McCain, or Credit Card "Reform", or Healthcare "Reform"... This isn't a confidence game because we don't have confidence in our Congress anymore. We see them coming, we know they're going to screw us, the tell us they're not going to screw us-- even as they ARE screwing us, they chastise us for whining about being screwed, and they hang around to screw us again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "Cooling the Mark" is happening at DU today.
Look at the posters that focus on:

"but millions will now have coverage",

or

"reform is slow. We have to accept half a loaf..its progress"

or

"this is the best we can do without 60 votes...just accept it and move on"

or

"they will go back and fix it later"

The TRUTH is:
This Bill is a massive transfer of Public Wealth to the pockets of the Private For Profit sector
with the IRS as the "Collection Agency"
.

NO amount of "look on the bright side" can ameliorate this hideous TRUTH.

FOLLOW. THE. MONEY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The weirdest part of it is that those who are most easily cooled often
turn and become operators themselves- it's part of what helps them feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, I guess they really care: they're cooling us out!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We're just suckers with no self-esteem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. That was written long ago. Today, the marks cool themselves out.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 08:28 PM by kenny blankenship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Had you seen it before?
Do you know more about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No. But I once had Goffman's "Frame Analysis" checked out from the library
and I know that was written in the 1960s. Guessing this is from the same period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. I dunno, the 100-posts-or-less posters chanting "It's historic! It's great! It saves lives!"
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 08:29 PM by MisterP
seem to just be riling the full-public-optioners/universalists up more--since every miracle they claim the bill does can be done far cheaper with universal or opt-in (whether free or $100/month) Medicare

of course, their cries of dire necessity and that this is the only possibility show that their viewpoint is even more blinkered than the GOP's, since the latter party is avoiding any ties to an upopular bill (not that the bill is sweetness and light)

their insistence that we "simmer down" and "not point fingers" shows that they have no concept of righteous anger: to a technocrat, everyone must be levelheaded, cool, and unemotional or -sentimental: Arendt knew exactly what she was talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC