Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is Gross Profit, and Adjusted Gross Profit, and then there is Net Profit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 02:28 PM
Original message
There is Gross Profit, and Adjusted Gross Profit, and then there is Net Profit
The Bill says is will make it so they can only have fifteen percent Profit. Remember Net Profit is after every single expense has been paid including huge salaries.. Which Profit is the Bill referring to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. you left out obscene profit.
like the kind that's made from other people's suffering, for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. The MLR (or rather its inverse) unless I am mistaken
Which would be that 85% of revenue has to go into payments for services. As such this would be closest to gross profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's the way I understand it as well. The bill limits the amount
of money insco's can pay for things like salaries and advertising because they are restricted to 15% of their revenue to "play with". My guess is the stock holders will reall bitch if they get short changed and the execs still get their multi-million $ paychecks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Senate bill: For small plans, 80% of premiums need to go to claims.
For big plans, 85% of premiums need to go to claims.

The HHS Secretary can drop this requirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. you have to assume it's net. & 15% = armed robbery. average margins much lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nope. Not net at all. All revenue that is not spent on care. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. i'm talking about gross v. net profit. gross profit isn't really profit.
not sure what you're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm talking about the OPs question
In the bill proposal the limits of either 80% or 85% are thr percentage of revenue that must be spent on medical claims. NOT medical claims plus salaries, advertising, etc etc. So it's much closer to gross profit than net. In fact if you assume claims = direct COGs then it IS gross profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. OPs question:
"The Bill says is will make it so they can only have fifteen percent Profit... Which Profit is the Bill referring to?"

The OP says "profit," you say "non-claims".

So you're saying the bill doesn't refer to "profit" at all, contra the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You are stretching like a weak elastic band
The 15% as I have VERY CLEARLY stated refers to any revenue not paid in medical claims. That is the equivalent of gross profit at the very worst. If you can't admit you are wrong then that's your problem. Don't try to make it mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The OP said the bill uses the word "profit". You say it uses different words.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 08:17 PM by Hannah Bell
You've missed my point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Stolen profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Medical Loss Ratio
Sen. Rockefeller explains:

"One of the basic financial measures used in the health care industry is the percentage of health insurance premiums that insurers use to provide health care to their customers. This percentage is commonly known as the "medical loss ratio." For example, if an insurer uses 75 cents out of every premium dollar to pays its customers' medical claims, the company has a medical loss ratio of 75 percent. A medical loss ratio of 75 percent indicates that the insurer is using the remaining 25 cents of each premium dollar to pay expenses that do not directly benefit policyholders, such as salaries, administrative costs, advertising, agent commissions, and profits."

The insurance giants argued that medical loss information is "proprietary" and "business sensitive." So Rockefeller asked the Senate Commerce Committee to investigate. The committee concluded, by examining premium and claims data reported to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, that the medical loss ratio is significantly lower than the industry would have them believe.

Reed Abelson of the New York Times reports that in 2008, the for-profit average medical loss ratio was 84 percent in policies offered to large employers and 80 percent in policies offered to small businesses. In the individual market, there was an average medical loss ratio of 74 percent. Rockefeller specifically accuses CIGNA of breaking the law and inaccurately reporting information to the NAIC -- they had claimed a medical loss ratio of 93 percent.

The Senate analysis shows that the health insurance industry "provided one set of premium-benefit numbers to the public and to Congress, and presented a different one to their investors." The letter says that America's Health Insurance Plans' (AHIP) claim that the industry spends 87 cents of every premium dollar on medical care was part of an "expensive public relations effort." The publicly-traded health insurers' own financial reporting to the Securities and Exchange Commission does not come close to supporting the figure -- see page 7 of the letter to CIGNA for the individual breakdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. They deserve no more than 2% net profit
They have zero risk. If profits dip or cost rise they raise rates. They have a anti-trust exemption. They are stealing our money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC