Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you ask me, we'd be better off keeping those 30 million uninsured.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:32 PM
Original message
If you ask me, we'd be better off keeping those 30 million uninsured.
What did they ever do for us, anyway?

And who could possibly support zero co-pays for routine screenings and maintenance?

If only we could have held out for that single-payer bill. You know, the one that wouldn't have made it out of committee in any form?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're missing the point ....
Obama could have just willed single-payer into existence if he really wanted to. Lieberman and Nelson both would've voted for it, as well as four or five Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Stop it. Obama could have mobilized a Single Payer movement
Fatcat Congress members would have had NO CHOICE but to go along
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sure they'd have a choice.
What makes you think they wouldn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Last I heard they're elected, not appointed
At least I THINK that's how it still works

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Particularly if Obama dangled some yarn in front of them. Those Fatcats would be helpless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I doubt that the peeple would get off their dead asses in the
numbers needed to effect that kind of leverage.

Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. They got off their 'dead asses' and voted for him
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes, they did.....
But I haven't seen many of them on the mall or anywhere else fighting this fight.

I called and written and shoved my cats around over it....but the newness of the political activism people felt during the election seems to have faded back into an obsession with sports and JOBS, and, on the other side teabaggers....

I have little hope that the numbers that turned out last time will even come close to being matched this time.

No matter what the legislation coming out of the administration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, too much straw. I can barely see in here.
Scarecrows all over the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. How so?
Do you really think Single Payer would have gotten off the ground? How's the reading of the Sanders amendment coming along? The OP was clearly a deliberate and self-aware caricature of the opposition to the bill; it wasn't presenting that caricature as an accurate representation of the opposition's views. For that reason, it's hardly a straw man.

Besides which, anyone who expected a Progressive's Wish-list of a bill was setting themselves up to fault Obama for its failure.

Krugman noted recently that healthcare proposals are weakened every time they're defeated, so that each bill is progressively worse (excuse the pun) than what preceded it. The current bill is indeed far from perfect, but it puts us in a position of having something to improve upon, rather than having to pass something even weaker when healthcare reform is presented again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. *** sigh ****


I got you the really big box of popcorn.

There is logic with what you have said. I know that HCR isn't perfect but it doesn't mean we can't ever visit there again.

I know many people who will benefit when this bill is passed and no not Heathcare CEOs but everyday folks like you and me.

But just incase - I'm ready:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. But corporations are running the world and we must tilt at corporate windmills.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 03:42 PM by Ozymanithrax
Really, Corporations whose soul and messenger is Cheney-Nyarlathotep must be opposed at all costs. Thirty million are but a small price to pay in the never ending struggle against elder corporate gods who dance mindlessly to strange flutes at the center most blot of all eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. You need that sarcasm tag on that one.
Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Sarcasm tags are for amateurs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You must be dying for a barbecued ass today
People who don't know you and who are suffering from Christmas funk are not going to take it kindly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Mmm... Barbecued ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nobody said it better than Obama himself
People who can't afford insurance now aren't going to be able to afford it any better when it's "mandated" and it makes as much sense as a mandate that homeless people buy houses.

The man needs to listen to some of his own speeches and remind himself of what sort of President he told us he would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Re your sig line, the mythology applies to our presidents as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Say ANYTHING to get elected and then do whatever the hell the corporate masters want.
While pulling the wool over as many eyes as possible. Nothing new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. That's where the subsidies kick in...
If someone is too poor, then subsidies will make up the difference. The subsidies will be available for people with incomes up to 400 percent of the poverty line.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. So in other words, government subsidies for rich criminal bastards?
Not that it would be the first time (MonSatan, tobacco companies, etc) but why in God's name should we do that again?

Just cut the filthy pieces of shit out of the picture and use the government subsidies to actually pay for health care and not some fucking billionaire's mansion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StreetKnowledge Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. No Argument From Me.
It would be better (and almost certainly cheaper) to cover people via public insurance options. But nooooo, can't piss off the American aristocracy......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Very true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. It will be interesting to see how many of the 30 million will be able
to afford insurance even with a subsidy. Especially older people who are on the hook for 3 times the going rate. Something I read gave me the impression my husband and I would be eligible for a $700 subsidy. Our last insurance quote was about $20,000. If I could afford $19,300 a year, I probably wouldn't be uninsured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Bingo. 30 million is talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC