Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can anything destroy the Democratic Party faster than a phony "reform" that destroys the middle...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:53 PM
Original message
Can anything destroy the Democratic Party faster than a phony "reform" that destroys the middle...
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 04:57 PM by Faryn Balyncd



....class?


Than a president who claims to be for a "public option", but who in fact is responsible for pressuring the Senate to drop it, so that a naked mandate to buy insurance from predatory insurance corporations could be passed, and he could clain to have "gotten health reform done"?










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StreetKnowledge Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm beginning to think not.
But then again, the American aristocrats want both parties to represent them, and would shit bricks if anybody actually represented the other 90% of us. So everybody gets paid off, or at least enough people to ensure things go their way. And people wonder why hatred of Congress is becoming not just a right-wing ideal......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're going to be disappointed when the Middle Class does just fine with this bill
aren't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sukie Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I believe he will be, along with all the other
whineleaders on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. our vanishing, maxed out, stressed out, debt laden middle class, happy with
what amounts to a massive tax increase?

Oh yeah, they're going to be giddy. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The vast majority of the Middle class already have insurance
Fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. and won't they be happy when they see their rates go through the roof
oh yeah. I can here the celebration now. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Man, you just can't stop the bullshit, can you?
:eyes:

But wallow in your whinefest. This is the single most progressive piece pf legislation in over forty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. hey, you can spew all the spin you can handle
that doesn't change what's going to happen.

Your view of the middle class is over-simplified, at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I believe it is your view that is over-simplified
and you're the one spinning.

And using rightwingnut spin at that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. lol
it's called common sense, not spin.

As I said before, we shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. lol. since before 1969? doubtful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. like me
but I guess I am working poor, not middle class.

I have health insurance that I cannot utilize due to high co-payments. If I had unlimited income I would have excellent health care. But right now all I have is private health insurance that I cannot afford to utilize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. And *eventually* standardization will improve your crappy insurance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I pray to God that you are correct
I am willing to take the hit, the higher co-payments, the lack of coverage, if it means a VICTORY for Obama.
It would be icing on the cake if Obama's victory also benefited me. That would be great!

I am proof that the status quo must change (insured but not making enough money to access healthcare).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. they'll be taxed more and more on it; as opposed to taxing the rich to pay for it;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. When you are disappointed that the health insurance companies screw the Middle Class with this bill
are you going to be disappointed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The vast majority of the middle class already have insurance
through their employers.

For those that don't, many will get a subsidy.

You're just pissed that Obama is about to have a HUGE victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Other then giving Obama a victory, how does this help me?
I have health insurance through my employer, but I don't earn enough to pay for my co-payments.
How does this help me. I grew up middle class, but I guess I am now working poor.:shrug:

ps- I am down with Obama having a victory. I am down with him getting a bump from Afghanistan. I am down with him getting campaign cash from corporations. I am down with his re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. they'll now be taxed....rather than taxing the wealthy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. rising Taxes on middle income Wages:
"The excise tax, (which is not in the House bill) which the CBO itself says will affect 19% of people with employer-provided insurance in 2016. In 2019, six years after this bill takes effect, the excise tax will affect one in five taxpayers making $50-$75,000 per year, and the average tax impact on this bracket will rise to $1,100 a year in 2019.
In addition, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, another CBO-like organization) predicts that the excise tax will actually make coverage worse for very little return in savings.

In reaction to the tax, many employers would reduce the scope of their health benefits. The resulting reductions in covered services and/or increases in employee cost-sharing requirements would induce workers to use fewer services. Because plan benefit values would generally increase faster than the threshold amounts for defining high-cost plans (which are indexed by the CPI plus 1 percent), over time additional plans would become subject to the excise tax, prompting those employers to scale back coverage.

The savings?

This excise tax, which would reduce the quality of millions of Americans’ health insurance coverage, will technically "bend the cost curve" by just barely 0.3% in 2019. All that for a measly 0.3% reduction in national health expenditures. To give you a comparison, CBO projects that Dorgan’s drug re-importation would reduce spending on prescription drugs roughly $100 billion over the next decade (I think the savings could easily end up 4-5 times that amount). A $10 billion reduction in prescription drug spending compared to the total NHE spending last year, which was roughly $2.4 trillion in 2008, would be a 0.4% reduction in NHE. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Please tell me how I will be fine under this bill
I work f/t earn $30k and have insurance through my employer.
I cannot afford the treatment that my medical providers state I need because my health insurance requires co-payments that I cannot afford.
So I HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE, but I CANNOT AFFORD MEDICAL TREATMENT. Because my co-pays are too expensive for my limited income to cover.

So how will I be fine under this bill? What relief will I receive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2 Much Tribulation Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. ANSWER: No. Or not much can do it faster than that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did I not say Obama is very conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. If only what you describe were at all similar to reality. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. none of us have the vaguest clue as to what this legislation will do
will it help people access decent care? will it hurt them?

We. Just. Don't. Know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. How does this bill destroy the middle class?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. The rampant overblown rhetoric here has become ridiculous.
83% of us already have insurance through one mechanism or another and we will not be affected much other than perhaps less bullshit from the insurance managers, a reduction in price inflation, a reduction in out of pocket expenses, improved and standardized benefits, etc.

The 17% who have no insurance will now at least have affordable access to insurance. Currently they do not have that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. When the democratic majority dumps NAFTA, this will all be forgotten. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. How is the middle class being destroyed?
The other day it was the middle and the working classes that were going to be destroyed, so are you saying that the working class will be just fine?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Well, it hasn't passed yet.........


...But a mandate to purchase an overpriced product from predatory corporations, with no option to purchase from a public plan, and no option to buy-in to a fairly priced plan such as Medicare, and (in part because of the lack of such public options) the prospect of escalation of now-mandated premiums will each be another potential nail in the coffin.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. In other words, you're making a lot of assumptions, instead of a legitimate critique.
Thanks for clarifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. What assumptions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. I can think of a few things
which are already on the agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. No one has addressed whether mandated insurance is
constitutional. I'm not a constitutional scholar, but this feels very wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
34. Intractable wars, economic meltdowns and sex scandals...
Have been bigger party killers, historically speaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. Nope. I really hate saying "I told you so" a million fucking times after
all this SIMPLE ASS SHIT has to be explained to politicians every time. I've come to the conclusion that other dynamics are at work -- like corruption and sociopathic personalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC