Faryn Balyncd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 04:53 PM
Original message |
Can anything destroy the Democratic Party faster than a phony "reform" that destroys the middle... |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 04:57 PM by Faryn Balyncd
....class?
Than a president who claims to be for a "public option", but who in fact is responsible for pressuring the Senate to drop it, so that a naked mandate to buy insurance from predatory insurance corporations could be passed, and he could clain to have "gotten health reform done"?
|
StreetKnowledge
(921 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm beginning to think not. |
|
But then again, the American aristocrats want both parties to represent them, and would shit bricks if anybody actually represented the other 90% of us. So everybody gets paid off, or at least enough people to ensure things go their way. And people wonder why hatred of Congress is becoming not just a right-wing ideal......
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You're going to be disappointed when the Middle Class does just fine with this bill |
Sukie
(563 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. I believe he will be, along with all the other |
ixion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. our vanishing, maxed out, stressed out, debt laden middle class, happy with |
|
what amounts to a massive tax increase?
Oh yeah, they're going to be giddy. :rofl:
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. The vast majority of the Middle class already have insurance |
ixion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. and won't they be happy when they see their rates go through the roof |
|
oh yeah. I can here the celebration now. :eyes:
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Man, you just can't stop the bullshit, can you? |
|
:eyes:
But wallow in your whinefest. This is the single most progressive piece pf legislation in over forty years.
|
ixion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. hey, you can spew all the spin you can handle |
|
that doesn't change what's going to happen.
Your view of the middle class is over-simplified, at best.
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. I believe it is your view that is over-simplified |
|
and you're the one spinning.
And using rightwingnut spin at that!
|
ixion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
it's called common sense, not spin.
As I said before, we shall see.
|
Hannah Bell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
28. lol. since before 1969? doubtful. |
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
but I guess I am working poor, not middle class.
I have health insurance that I cannot utilize due to high co-payments. If I had unlimited income I would have excellent health care. But right now all I have is private health insurance that I cannot afford to utilize.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
24. And *eventually* standardization will improve your crappy insurance |
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. I pray to God that you are correct |
|
I am willing to take the hit, the higher co-payments, the lack of coverage, if it means a VICTORY for Obama. It would be icing on the cake if Obama's victory also benefited me. That would be great!
I am proof that the status quo must change (insured but not making enough money to access healthcare).
|
amborin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
30. they'll be taxed more and more on it; as opposed to taxing the rich to pay for it; |
Larkspur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. When you are disappointed that the health insurance companies screw the Middle Class with this bill |
|
are you going to be disappointed?
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. The vast majority of the middle class already have insurance |
|
through their employers.
For those that don't, many will get a subsidy.
You're just pissed that Obama is about to have a HUGE victory.
|
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
19. Other then giving Obama a victory, how does this help me? |
|
I have health insurance through my employer, but I don't earn enough to pay for my co-payments. How does this help me. I grew up middle class, but I guess I am now working poor.:shrug:
ps- I am down with Obama having a victory. I am down with him getting a bump from Afghanistan. I am down with him getting campaign cash from corporations. I am down with his re-election.
|
amborin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
31. they'll now be taxed....rather than taxing the wealthy |
amborin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
32. rising Taxes on middle income Wages: |
|
"The excise tax, (which is not in the House bill) which the CBO itself says will affect 19% of people with employer-provided insurance in 2016. In 2019, six years after this bill takes effect, the excise tax will affect one in five taxpayers making $50-$75,000 per year, and the average tax impact on this bracket will rise to $1,100 a year in 2019. In addition, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, another CBO-like organization) predicts that the excise tax will actually make coverage worse for very little return in savings.
In reaction to the tax, many employers would reduce the scope of their health benefits. The resulting reductions in covered services and/or increases in employee cost-sharing requirements would induce workers to use fewer services. Because plan benefit values would generally increase faster than the threshold amounts for defining high-cost plans (which are indexed by the CPI plus 1 percent), over time additional plans would become subject to the excise tax, prompting those employers to scale back coverage.
The savings?
This excise tax, which would reduce the quality of millions of Americans’ health insurance coverage, will technically "bend the cost curve" by just barely 0.3% in 2019. All that for a measly 0.3% reduction in national health expenditures. To give you a comparison, CBO projects that Dorgan’s drug re-importation would reduce spending on prescription drugs roughly $100 billion over the next decade (I think the savings could easily end up 4-5 times that amount). A $10 billion reduction in prescription drug spending compared to the total NHE spending last year, which was roughly $2.4 trillion in 2008, would be a 0.4% reduction in NHE. "
|
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
17. Please tell me how I will be fine under this bill |
|
I work f/t earn $30k and have insurance through my employer. I cannot afford the treatment that my medical providers state I need because my health insurance requires co-payments that I cannot afford. So I HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE, but I CANNOT AFFORD MEDICAL TREATMENT. Because my co-pays are too expensive for my limited income to cover.
So how will I be fine under this bill? What relief will I receive?
|
2 Much Tribulation
(522 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message |
3. ANSWER: No. Or not much can do it faster than that. nt |
Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Did I not say Obama is very conservative. |
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If only what you describe were at all similar to reality. nt |
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
10. none of us have the vaguest clue as to what this legislation will do |
|
will it help people access decent care? will it hurt them?
We. Just. Don't. Know.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message |
20. How does this bill destroy the middle class? |
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. The rampant overblown rhetoric here has become ridiculous. |
|
83% of us already have insurance through one mechanism or another and we will not be affected much other than perhaps less bullshit from the insurance managers, a reduction in price inflation, a reduction in out of pocket expenses, improved and standardized benefits, etc.
The 17% who have no insurance will now at least have affordable access to insurance. Currently they do not have that at all.
|
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
21. When the democratic majority dumps NAFTA, this will all be forgotten. . . |
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |
23. How is the middle class being destroyed? |
|
The other day it was the middle and the working classes that were going to be destroyed, so are you saying that the working class will be just fine?
:shrug:
|
Faryn Balyncd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
27. Well, it hasn't passed yet......... |
|
...But a mandate to purchase an overpriced product from predatory corporations, with no option to purchase from a public plan, and no option to buy-in to a fairly priced plan such as Medicare, and (in part because of the lack of such public options) the prospect of escalation of now-mandated premiums will each be another potential nail in the coffin.
|
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
33. In other words, you're making a lot of assumptions, instead of a legitimate critique. |
Faryn Balyncd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
notesdev
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message |
26. I can think of a few things |
|
which are already on the agenda
|
EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message |
29. No one has addressed whether mandated insurance is |
|
constitutional. I'm not a constitutional scholar, but this feels very wrong.
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Intractable wars, economic meltdowns and sex scandals... |
|
Have been bigger party killers, historically speaking.
|
Nay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-21-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Nope. I really hate saying "I told you so" a million fucking times after |
|
all this SIMPLE ASS SHIT has to be explained to politicians every time. I've come to the conclusion that other dynamics are at work -- like corruption and sociopathic personalities.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message |