Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Graham says 'sleazy process' will damage Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:19 AM
Original message
Graham says 'sleazy process' will damage Congress
Graham says 'sleazy process' will damage Congress

With a Senate health care bill on track to be passed before Christmas without a single Republican vote, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham says his biggest concern about what he calls a “sleazy process” is the long-term damage it will do on Capitol Hill.

“You are legitimizing partisan outcomes rather than looking at the best interest of the nation and that is to hold hands and do big things together,” Graham said in an interview Monday from Washington.

“It’s the first time a major piece of legislation has passed along partisan lines,” he said, “a departure from what has been a longstanding accepted principle up here that massive changes like Social Security and Medicare will require bipartisanship because that’s good for the country.”

Graham, a South Carolina Republican, also is concerned about the bill itself, which he said has been made to appear deficit neutral with phony bookkeeping requiring income and budget cuts that almost certainly won’t happen.
(More, if you can stomach it :puke:)

http://www.greenvilleonline.com/article/20091222/NEWS/912220332/Graham-says-‘sleazy-process-will-damage-Congress


Sleazy is as sleazy does, Lindsey. Your GOP wrote the book on sleaze (remember Mr. Rove?).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. O the irony. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. So by using the same shit that Congres shas used for more than two centuries
Congress will now be damaged?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. If there's one thing Graham is an expert on, it's sleaze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think the lady doth protest too much.....
hahahahahahahahah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, a one party system would be so much easier.
I know that's what you're thinking Whiney Lindsey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Repigs had NO interest in "holding hands and doing big things together"
when THEY were in the majority.

Today is yet another day to say: "Pretentious hypocrisy is the Hallmark of Republicans"

And they prove it yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Really, Lindsay? Have you checked with Michael Schiavo lately?
But while we're on the subject, what did the Republicans offer, and what was their input that might have helped people hold hands and work together? A budget without numbers? A public hissy-fit about how nobody voted for your non-existent ideas? What were the Republicans prepared to contribute besides fear, lies, obfuscation, confusion and negativity? Even four-year-olds can grasp the concept that if they don't participate, they're going to get stuck with whatever is left over. Right now the Republicans don't impress me as having the maturity of even a four-year-old.

Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Go F yourself"
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 12:15 PM by mzmolly
Mr. Graham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. 2 words for Lindsey: selective memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC